Cargando…

2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

BACKGROUND: Extended-infusion (EI) piperacillin/tazobactam, compared to intermittent-infusion (II) piperacillin/tazobactam, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes for both critically ill and febrile neutropenic patients. However, there is a paucity of data on whether these clinical bene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shifko, Carlee R, Carr, Dustin R, Walsh, Thomas L, Moffa, Matthew A, Shively, Nathan R, Bremmer, Derek N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678606/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2416
_version_ 1785150402292875264
author Shifko, Carlee R
Carr, Dustin R
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew A
Shively, Nathan R
Bremmer, Derek N
author_facet Shifko, Carlee R
Carr, Dustin R
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew A
Shively, Nathan R
Bremmer, Derek N
author_sort Shifko, Carlee R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extended-infusion (EI) piperacillin/tazobactam, compared to intermittent-infusion (II) piperacillin/tazobactam, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes for both critically ill and febrile neutropenic patients. However, there is a paucity of data on whether these clinical benefits apply to broader populations. Infections involving high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Pseudomonas aeruginosa represent an additional group where optimization of pharmacokinetic parameters may impact treatment success. METHODS: Medical records of adults who received II or EI piperacillin/tazobactam for pneumonia and/or bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with MIC 8 or 16 mcg/mL were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Hospital and/or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and recurrence of infection were also recorded. Additionally, an escalation of care composite was assessed by need for new ICU transfer, new vasopressor start, new mechanical ventilation, or rescue antibiotic therapy change. Finally, a safety outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI) was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included, 31 in the II group and 38 in the EI group. Bacteremia was detected in 19.4% and 23.7% of the II and EI groups, respectively (p = 0.66). Baseline demographics and characteristics of treatment were similar between groups. The most common dosing regimens were 3.375 g IV every 6 hours over 30 minutes and 3.375 g IV every 8 hours over 4 hours. 30-day mortality was 32.3% in the II group and 39.5% in the EI group (p = 0.54). Similarly, hospital LOS (19 versus 15 days, p = 0.27) and ICU LOS (23 versus 15 days, p = 0.15), as well as recurrence (29.4% versus 23.5%, p = 1) and therapy escalation (38.7% versus 47.4%, p = 0.47), were not significantly different between groups. 43.5% of patients in the II group and 40.6% of patients in the EI group developed AKI (p = 0.83). CONCLUSION: The present study found no significant difference in outcomes between piperacillin/tazobactam infusion strategies. However, the small sample size and complex patient factors may have limited the comparison. DISCLOSURES: Dustin R. Carr, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck: Advisor/Consultant Thomas L. Walsh, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant Derek N. Bremmer, PharmD, BCIDP, Thermo Fisher Scientific: Advisor/Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786062023-11-27 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections Shifko, Carlee R Carr, Dustin R Walsh, Thomas L Moffa, Matthew A Shively, Nathan R Bremmer, Derek N Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Extended-infusion (EI) piperacillin/tazobactam, compared to intermittent-infusion (II) piperacillin/tazobactam, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes for both critically ill and febrile neutropenic patients. However, there is a paucity of data on whether these clinical benefits apply to broader populations. Infections involving high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Pseudomonas aeruginosa represent an additional group where optimization of pharmacokinetic parameters may impact treatment success. METHODS: Medical records of adults who received II or EI piperacillin/tazobactam for pneumonia and/or bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with MIC 8 or 16 mcg/mL were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Hospital and/or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and recurrence of infection were also recorded. Additionally, an escalation of care composite was assessed by need for new ICU transfer, new vasopressor start, new mechanical ventilation, or rescue antibiotic therapy change. Finally, a safety outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI) was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included, 31 in the II group and 38 in the EI group. Bacteremia was detected in 19.4% and 23.7% of the II and EI groups, respectively (p = 0.66). Baseline demographics and characteristics of treatment were similar between groups. The most common dosing regimens were 3.375 g IV every 6 hours over 30 minutes and 3.375 g IV every 8 hours over 4 hours. 30-day mortality was 32.3% in the II group and 39.5% in the EI group (p = 0.54). Similarly, hospital LOS (19 versus 15 days, p = 0.27) and ICU LOS (23 versus 15 days, p = 0.15), as well as recurrence (29.4% versus 23.5%, p = 1) and therapy escalation (38.7% versus 47.4%, p = 0.47), were not significantly different between groups. 43.5% of patients in the II group and 40.6% of patients in the EI group developed AKI (p = 0.83). CONCLUSION: The present study found no significant difference in outcomes between piperacillin/tazobactam infusion strategies. However, the small sample size and complex patient factors may have limited the comparison. DISCLOSURES: Dustin R. Carr, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck: Advisor/Consultant Thomas L. Walsh, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant Derek N. Bremmer, PharmD, BCIDP, Thermo Fisher Scientific: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678606/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2416 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Shifko, Carlee R
Carr, Dustin R
Walsh, Thomas L
Moffa, Matthew A
Shively, Nathan R
Bremmer, Derek N
2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title_full 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title_fullStr 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title_full_unstemmed 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title_short 2805. Extended-Infusion versus Intermittent-Infusion Piperacillin/tazobactam for High Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections
title_sort 2805. extended-infusion versus intermittent-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam for high minimum inhibitory concentration pseudomonas aeruginosa infections
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678606/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2416
work_keys_str_mv AT shifkocarleer 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections
AT carrdustinr 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections
AT walshthomasl 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections
AT moffamatthewa 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections
AT shivelynathanr 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections
AT bremmerderekn 2805extendedinfusionversusintermittentinfusionpiperacillintazobactamforhighminimuminhibitoryconcentrationpseudomonasaeruginosainfections