Cargando…

2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial dosing is crucial for survival in patient with septic shock. However, attaining therapeutic antimicrobial serum concentration is often problematic due to pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness. Antimicrobial concentrations can be decreased due...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tawwater, John C, Adams, David T, Kaur, Satwinder S, Ibragimova, Nayle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678611/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2162
_version_ 1785150403688529920
author Tawwater, John C
Adams, David T
Kaur, Satwinder S
Ibragimova, Nayle
author_facet Tawwater, John C
Adams, David T
Kaur, Satwinder S
Ibragimova, Nayle
author_sort Tawwater, John C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial dosing is crucial for survival in patient with septic shock. However, attaining therapeutic antimicrobial serum concentration is often problematic due to pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness. Antimicrobial concentrations can be decreased due to increased volume of distribution and augmented renal clearance. In addition, antibiotic doses are frequently adjusted per local renal dosing protocols based on creatinine clearance, resulting in suboptimal antibiotic exposures. The purpose of this study is to determine if unadjusted dosing of cefepime (CEF) and meropenem (MER) during the first 48 hours of septic shock improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study comparing renally dose adjusted CEF and MER per institutional renal dosing protocol (pre-group, PRE) and unadjusted, full-dose CEF and MER (post-group, POST) (Figure 1). Adults aged 18-89 years with septic shock, initially treated with CEF or MER for at least 48 hours, and presenting with renal impairment are included. Patients receiving renal replacement therapies are excluded. The primary outcome is vasopressor-free days (VFD). Secondary outcomes are composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-free days. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of receipt of stress-dose steroids, which was significantly higher in PRE (p=0.019). The primary outcome of VFD was not significantly different between the groups, with a median of 9.33 days in PRE (n=40) and 9.54 days in POST (n=32) (Figure 2). The hospital LOS (PRE 12.5 days, POST 5.25 days, p=0.121), ICU LOS (PRE 5.5 days, POST 5 days, p=0.15), mortality, and SIRS-free days were not significantly different between the groups (Figure 3). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Unadjusted beta-lactam dosing did not increase VFD, although the significantly higher use of stress-dose steroids in PRE could confound the result. There was no differences in secondary efficacy outcomes; however, an overall trend for shorter hospital LOS and ICU LOS in POST was observed. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786112023-11-27 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock Tawwater, John C Adams, David T Kaur, Satwinder S Ibragimova, Nayle Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial dosing is crucial for survival in patient with septic shock. However, attaining therapeutic antimicrobial serum concentration is often problematic due to pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness. Antimicrobial concentrations can be decreased due to increased volume of distribution and augmented renal clearance. In addition, antibiotic doses are frequently adjusted per local renal dosing protocols based on creatinine clearance, resulting in suboptimal antibiotic exposures. The purpose of this study is to determine if unadjusted dosing of cefepime (CEF) and meropenem (MER) during the first 48 hours of septic shock improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study comparing renally dose adjusted CEF and MER per institutional renal dosing protocol (pre-group, PRE) and unadjusted, full-dose CEF and MER (post-group, POST) (Figure 1). Adults aged 18-89 years with septic shock, initially treated with CEF or MER for at least 48 hours, and presenting with renal impairment are included. Patients receiving renal replacement therapies are excluded. The primary outcome is vasopressor-free days (VFD). Secondary outcomes are composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-free days. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of receipt of stress-dose steroids, which was significantly higher in PRE (p=0.019). The primary outcome of VFD was not significantly different between the groups, with a median of 9.33 days in PRE (n=40) and 9.54 days in POST (n=32) (Figure 2). The hospital LOS (PRE 12.5 days, POST 5.25 days, p=0.121), ICU LOS (PRE 5.5 days, POST 5 days, p=0.15), mortality, and SIRS-free days were not significantly different between the groups (Figure 3). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Unadjusted beta-lactam dosing did not increase VFD, although the significantly higher use of stress-dose steroids in PRE could confound the result. There was no differences in secondary efficacy outcomes; however, an overall trend for shorter hospital LOS and ICU LOS in POST was observed. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678611/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2162 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Tawwater, John C
Adams, David T
Kaur, Satwinder S
Ibragimova, Nayle
2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title_full 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title_fullStr 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title_short 2545. Impact of Early Dose Adjustment of Beta-Lactams in Patient with Septic Shock
title_sort 2545. impact of early dose adjustment of beta-lactams in patient with septic shock
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678611/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2162
work_keys_str_mv AT tawwaterjohnc 2545impactofearlydoseadjustmentofbetalactamsinpatientwithsepticshock
AT adamsdavidt 2545impactofearlydoseadjustmentofbetalactamsinpatientwithsepticshock
AT kaursatwinders 2545impactofearlydoseadjustmentofbetalactamsinpatientwithsepticshock
AT ibragimovanayle 2545impactofearlydoseadjustmentofbetalactamsinpatientwithsepticshock