Cargando…

1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend an antibiogram as a key component when making empiric therapy decisions. However, little is known about how clinicians utilize antibiograms. We aimed to assess the interpretation thresholds of hospital antibiograms among infectious diseases (ID) providers wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasegawa, Shinya, Perencevich, Eli N, Dukes, Kimberly, Goto, Michihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678616/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1083
_version_ 1785150404833574912
author Hasegawa, Shinya
Perencevich, Eli N
Dukes, Kimberly
Goto, Michihiko
author_facet Hasegawa, Shinya
Perencevich, Eli N
Dukes, Kimberly
Goto, Michihiko
author_sort Hasegawa, Shinya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend an antibiogram as a key component when making empiric therapy decisions. However, little is known about how clinicians utilize antibiograms. We aimed to assess the interpretation thresholds of hospital antibiograms among infectious diseases (ID) providers when making empiric therapy decisions for Gram-negative rods (GNRs) infections. [Figure: see text] METHODS: We conducted an email-based survey of ID providers practicing at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. We included four scenarios: i) a patient with urinary tract infection (UTI) in an outpatient setting, ii) a patient with UTI in an inpatient setting, iii) a patient with GNR bloodstream infection (GNR-BSI) in a non-intensive care unit (ICU) setting, and iv) a patient with GNR-BSI in an ICU setting. Each scenario randomly assigned antibiogram percentages and asked providers if they would feel comfortable selecting a hypothetical empiric therapy agent with the given value. Contingent valuation analyses were done by logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between the percentages offered to providers and their willingness to use offered agents. RESULTS: In the preliminary analysis, 112 of 599 providers (18.7%) responded and 104 provided effective responses. Hospital antibiograms are generally used infrequently, and only 30.8% of providers indicated that they use antibiograms more than once a month. The estimated median interpretation thresholds, meaning half of the ID providers would prescribe the hypothetical antibiotic in each case with the values given on antibiograms, were significantly higher for patients with more severe illnesses (85.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 83.1-88.1] for an inpatient with UTI vs 74.1% [95%CI 69.7-77.6] for an outpatient with UTI; 86.0% [95%CI 83.1-89.4] for a patient with GNR-BSI in ICU vs 77.9% [95%CI 74.2-81.2] for a patient with GNR-BSI in non-ICU) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ID providers rarely utilized antibiograms and the median thresholds for hospital antibiograms influencing empiric antibiotic selection ranged from 74-86%, depending on the severity but not by the type of infection (UTI vs. BSI). Further analyses after we receive more responses will be completed. DISCLOSURES: Michihiko Goto, MD MSCI, Merck & Co.: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786162023-11-27 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers Hasegawa, Shinya Perencevich, Eli N Dukes, Kimberly Goto, Michihiko Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend an antibiogram as a key component when making empiric therapy decisions. However, little is known about how clinicians utilize antibiograms. We aimed to assess the interpretation thresholds of hospital antibiograms among infectious diseases (ID) providers when making empiric therapy decisions for Gram-negative rods (GNRs) infections. [Figure: see text] METHODS: We conducted an email-based survey of ID providers practicing at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. We included four scenarios: i) a patient with urinary tract infection (UTI) in an outpatient setting, ii) a patient with UTI in an inpatient setting, iii) a patient with GNR bloodstream infection (GNR-BSI) in a non-intensive care unit (ICU) setting, and iv) a patient with GNR-BSI in an ICU setting. Each scenario randomly assigned antibiogram percentages and asked providers if they would feel comfortable selecting a hypothetical empiric therapy agent with the given value. Contingent valuation analyses were done by logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between the percentages offered to providers and their willingness to use offered agents. RESULTS: In the preliminary analysis, 112 of 599 providers (18.7%) responded and 104 provided effective responses. Hospital antibiograms are generally used infrequently, and only 30.8% of providers indicated that they use antibiograms more than once a month. The estimated median interpretation thresholds, meaning half of the ID providers would prescribe the hypothetical antibiotic in each case with the values given on antibiograms, were significantly higher for patients with more severe illnesses (85.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 83.1-88.1] for an inpatient with UTI vs 74.1% [95%CI 69.7-77.6] for an outpatient with UTI; 86.0% [95%CI 83.1-89.4] for a patient with GNR-BSI in ICU vs 77.9% [95%CI 74.2-81.2] for a patient with GNR-BSI in non-ICU) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ID providers rarely utilized antibiograms and the median thresholds for hospital antibiograms influencing empiric antibiotic selection ranged from 74-86%, depending on the severity but not by the type of infection (UTI vs. BSI). Further analyses after we receive more responses will be completed. DISCLOSURES: Michihiko Goto, MD MSCI, Merck & Co.: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678616/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1083 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Hasegawa, Shinya
Perencevich, Eli N
Dukes, Kimberly
Goto, Michihiko
1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title_full 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title_fullStr 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title_full_unstemmed 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title_short 1243. Acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for Gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
title_sort 1243. acceptable susceptibility thresholds reported in hospital antibiograms for gram-negative rod infections: a survey and contingent valuation study of infectious diseases providers
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678616/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1083
work_keys_str_mv AT hasegawashinya 1243acceptablesusceptibilitythresholdsreportedinhospitalantibiogramsforgramnegativerodinfectionsasurveyandcontingentvaluationstudyofinfectiousdiseasesproviders
AT perencevichelin 1243acceptablesusceptibilitythresholdsreportedinhospitalantibiogramsforgramnegativerodinfectionsasurveyandcontingentvaluationstudyofinfectiousdiseasesproviders
AT dukeskimberly 1243acceptablesusceptibilitythresholdsreportedinhospitalantibiogramsforgramnegativerodinfectionsasurveyandcontingentvaluationstudyofinfectiousdiseasesproviders
AT gotomichihiko 1243acceptablesusceptibilitythresholdsreportedinhospitalantibiogramsforgramnegativerodinfectionsasurveyandcontingentvaluationstudyofinfectiousdiseasesproviders