Cargando…

1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy

BACKGROUND: With the advancement of combined antiretroviral therapy (ART), control of viral replication has improved so that most patients living with HIV (PWH) can maintain undetectable viral. However, HIV blips (defined as non-sustained detectable low-level viremia) are still commonly encountered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makhoul, Jennifer, Uppal, Surabhi, Barnes, Anne A, Werner, Logan A, Simon, Gary, Siegel, Marc O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1419
_version_ 1785150405057970176
author Makhoul, Jennifer
Uppal, Surabhi
Barnes, Anne A
Werner, Logan A
Simon, Gary
Siegel, Marc O
author_facet Makhoul, Jennifer
Uppal, Surabhi
Barnes, Anne A
Werner, Logan A
Simon, Gary
Siegel, Marc O
author_sort Makhoul, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advancement of combined antiretroviral therapy (ART), control of viral replication has improved so that most patients living with HIV (PWH) can maintain undetectable viral. However, HIV blips (defined as non-sustained detectable low-level viremia) are still commonly encountered in practice. Although these generally do not indicate treatment failure or ART resistance, their clinical significance remains a topic of debate. The aim of our study is to compare the rate of blips in patients on bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir (RPV/FTC/TAF) or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DOL/ABC/3TC). METHODS: We analyzed HIV viral load (VL) data of PWH who were treated in our clinic with either BIC/FTC/TAF, RPV/FTC/TAF or DOL/ABC/3TC between 3/2017 and 10/2021 for blips. We defined low level blips as HIV VL of 51-200 copies/mL and high-level blips of201-1000 copies/mL. The incidence of blips between these regimens was examined using Chi squared test. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included; 138 patients on BIC/FTC/TAF, 91 patients on RPV/FTC/TAF, and 95 patients on DOL/ABC/3TC). Patients on DOL/ABC/3TC were over twice as likely to have a viral blip (36%) compared to both BIC/FTC/TAF (16%, p=.0003) and RPV/FTC/TAF (14%, p=.0004). There were no statistically significant differences between patients taking BIC/FTC/TAF or RPV/FTC/TAF. Although the DOL/ABC/3TC group had a higher rate of high-level blips (6.3%) compared to BIC/FTC/TAF (3.6%) and RPV/FTC/TAF (4.4%), the total number of patients with high blips was low (n=15) and the differences were not statistically significant. Patients on DOL/ABC/3TC had average of 8 HIV VLs checked over the study period compared to 5 for patient on RPV/FTC/TAF and 3 for patient on BIC/FTC/TAF. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that PWH on DOL/ABC/3TC have higher rates of blips compared to PWH on BIC/FTC/TAF or RPV/FTC/TAF. Additional studies are needed to determine if this might be due to the lack of tenofovir alafenamide in the DOL/ABC/3TC or due to increased HIV VL testing in this population. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786172023-11-27 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy Makhoul, Jennifer Uppal, Surabhi Barnes, Anne A Werner, Logan A Simon, Gary Siegel, Marc O Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: With the advancement of combined antiretroviral therapy (ART), control of viral replication has improved so that most patients living with HIV (PWH) can maintain undetectable viral. However, HIV blips (defined as non-sustained detectable low-level viremia) are still commonly encountered in practice. Although these generally do not indicate treatment failure or ART resistance, their clinical significance remains a topic of debate. The aim of our study is to compare the rate of blips in patients on bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir (RPV/FTC/TAF) or dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DOL/ABC/3TC). METHODS: We analyzed HIV viral load (VL) data of PWH who were treated in our clinic with either BIC/FTC/TAF, RPV/FTC/TAF or DOL/ABC/3TC between 3/2017 and 10/2021 for blips. We defined low level blips as HIV VL of 51-200 copies/mL and high-level blips of201-1000 copies/mL. The incidence of blips between these regimens was examined using Chi squared test. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included; 138 patients on BIC/FTC/TAF, 91 patients on RPV/FTC/TAF, and 95 patients on DOL/ABC/3TC). Patients on DOL/ABC/3TC were over twice as likely to have a viral blip (36%) compared to both BIC/FTC/TAF (16%, p=.0003) and RPV/FTC/TAF (14%, p=.0004). There were no statistically significant differences between patients taking BIC/FTC/TAF or RPV/FTC/TAF. Although the DOL/ABC/3TC group had a higher rate of high-level blips (6.3%) compared to BIC/FTC/TAF (3.6%) and RPV/FTC/TAF (4.4%), the total number of patients with high blips was low (n=15) and the differences were not statistically significant. Patients on DOL/ABC/3TC had average of 8 HIV VLs checked over the study period compared to 5 for patient on RPV/FTC/TAF and 3 for patient on BIC/FTC/TAF. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that PWH on DOL/ABC/3TC have higher rates of blips compared to PWH on BIC/FTC/TAF or RPV/FTC/TAF. Additional studies are needed to determine if this might be due to the lack of tenofovir alafenamide in the DOL/ABC/3TC or due to increased HIV VL testing in this population. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678617/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1419 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Makhoul, Jennifer
Uppal, Surabhi
Barnes, Anne A
Werner, Logan A
Simon, Gary
Siegel, Marc O
1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title_full 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title_fullStr 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title_full_unstemmed 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title_short 1584. Retrospective Study Comparing the Rate of HIV Blips With Combined Antiretroviral Therapy
title_sort 1584. retrospective study comparing the rate of hiv blips with combined antiretroviral therapy
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1419
work_keys_str_mv AT makhouljennifer 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy
AT uppalsurabhi 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy
AT barnesannea 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy
AT wernerlogana 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy
AT simongary 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy
AT siegelmarco 1584retrospectivestudycomparingtherateofhivblipswithcombinedantiretroviraltherapy