Cargando…

2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection

BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin tromethamine is considered a first-line agent for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women according to the national Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline. However, non-E. coli Enterobacterales urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens exhibit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Traugott, Kristi, Lee, Grace, Groff, Lindsey, Aguilar, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678636/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2430
_version_ 1785150409446260736
author Traugott, Kristi
Lee, Grace
Groff, Lindsey
Aguilar, Samantha
author_facet Traugott, Kristi
Lee, Grace
Groff, Lindsey
Aguilar, Samantha
author_sort Traugott, Kristi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin tromethamine is considered a first-line agent for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women according to the national Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline. However, non-E. coli Enterobacterales urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens exhibit higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for fosfomycin and limited data exist to determine whether treatment outcomes are comparable to patients being treated with fosfomycin for E.coli UTIs. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients being treated with fosfomycin who have E. coli UTIs compared to non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs. METHODS: This was a retrospective noninferiority study of adult inpatients with a UTI who received a fosfomycin inpatient from July 15, 2020 to March 15, 2023. The primary outcome was incidence of treatment failure within 30 days of start of fosfomycin, defined by retreatment for UTI; UTI related- hospitalization, urgent care visits, and/or ambulatory visits; subsequent positive blood culture; and/or infection related mortality. One-sided test for noninferiority was used with a 20% margin. Multivaraible logistic regression analyses were conducted adjusting for age/sex, UTI severity, and prior UTIs. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included; 45 with E. coli UTIs and 32 with non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs. The majority of the patients were female (80.5%), with a median age of 67 years (IQR, 61-69), Hispanic/Latino (50.6%), had chronic kidney disease (33%), and diabetes mellitus (35%), and were admitted to a non-ICU floor (79%). The overall incidence of treatment failure was 19.5% (90% CI 12.9%-27.7%); 15.6% in those with E. coli vs. 25% in those with non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs (p=0.385; absolute difference 9.4%; 90% CI -7.3% to 26.2%), not meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. In multivariable analysis, E. coli vs. non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs did not associate with treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI 0.193-2.25; p=0.505). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Fosfomycin treatment for non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs did not meet non-inferiority criteria when compared to patients with E. coli UTIs. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786362023-11-27 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection Traugott, Kristi Lee, Grace Groff, Lindsey Aguilar, Samantha Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin tromethamine is considered a first-line agent for the treatment of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women according to the national Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guideline. However, non-E. coli Enterobacterales urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens exhibit higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for fosfomycin and limited data exist to determine whether treatment outcomes are comparable to patients being treated with fosfomycin for E.coli UTIs. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients being treated with fosfomycin who have E. coli UTIs compared to non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs. METHODS: This was a retrospective noninferiority study of adult inpatients with a UTI who received a fosfomycin inpatient from July 15, 2020 to March 15, 2023. The primary outcome was incidence of treatment failure within 30 days of start of fosfomycin, defined by retreatment for UTI; UTI related- hospitalization, urgent care visits, and/or ambulatory visits; subsequent positive blood culture; and/or infection related mortality. One-sided test for noninferiority was used with a 20% margin. Multivaraible logistic regression analyses were conducted adjusting for age/sex, UTI severity, and prior UTIs. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included; 45 with E. coli UTIs and 32 with non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs. The majority of the patients were female (80.5%), with a median age of 67 years (IQR, 61-69), Hispanic/Latino (50.6%), had chronic kidney disease (33%), and diabetes mellitus (35%), and were admitted to a non-ICU floor (79%). The overall incidence of treatment failure was 19.5% (90% CI 12.9%-27.7%); 15.6% in those with E. coli vs. 25% in those with non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs (p=0.385; absolute difference 9.4%; 90% CI -7.3% to 26.2%), not meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. In multivariable analysis, E. coli vs. non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs did not associate with treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI 0.193-2.25; p=0.505). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Fosfomycin treatment for non-E. coli Enterobacterales UTIs did not meet non-inferiority criteria when compared to patients with E. coli UTIs. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678636/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2430 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Traugott, Kristi
Lee, Grace
Groff, Lindsey
Aguilar, Samantha
2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title_full 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title_fullStr 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title_full_unstemmed 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title_short 2819. Clinical Outcomes of Fosfomycin Treatment in E. coli vs. Non-E. coli Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infection
title_sort 2819. clinical outcomes of fosfomycin treatment in e. coli vs. non-e. coli enterobacterales urinary tract infection
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678636/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2430
work_keys_str_mv AT traugottkristi 2819clinicaloutcomesoffosfomycintreatmentinecolivsnonecolienterobacteralesurinarytractinfection
AT leegrace 2819clinicaloutcomesoffosfomycintreatmentinecolivsnonecolienterobacteralesurinarytractinfection
AT grofflindsey 2819clinicaloutcomesoffosfomycintreatmentinecolivsnonecolienterobacteralesurinarytractinfection
AT aguilarsamantha 2819clinicaloutcomesoffosfomycintreatmentinecolivsnonecolienterobacteralesurinarytractinfection