Cargando…

1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial

BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long acting (CAB + RPV LA) is administered as an intramuscular injection every 1 or 2 months for treatment of HIV-1 infection. The need for frequent travel to a clinic could impair treatment access. We hypothesized that receiving treatment at-home would be a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Jamila K, Young, Christina, Hanson, Rochelle F, Moreland-Johnson, Angela, Adekunle, Ruth O, Kirk, Stephanie, Meissner, Eric G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.058
_version_ 1785150422099427328
author Williams, Jamila K
Young, Christina
Hanson, Rochelle F
Moreland-Johnson, Angela
Adekunle, Ruth O
Kirk, Stephanie
Meissner, Eric G
author_facet Williams, Jamila K
Young, Christina
Hanson, Rochelle F
Moreland-Johnson, Angela
Adekunle, Ruth O
Kirk, Stephanie
Meissner, Eric G
author_sort Williams, Jamila K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long acting (CAB + RPV LA) is administered as an intramuscular injection every 1 or 2 months for treatment of HIV-1 infection. The need for frequent travel to a clinic could impair treatment access. We hypothesized that receiving treatment at-home would be as safe and effective as receiving treatment in clinic and that having different options for where to receive treatment would result in high patient satisfaction. METHODS: Persons prescribed CAB + RPV LA in the Infectious Diseases Clinic at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) were offered enrollment in this implementation science study between August 2021 and December 2022. This study was approved by the MUSC IRB. After receiving the initial injection in clinic, study participants chose to receive each subsequent injection over the 12-month intervention in clinic or at home, with option to switch during the study. For home injections, CAB + RPV LA was shipped to participants’ homes and stored refrigerated until preparation and administration by a home health provider. For clinic injections, CAB + RPV LA was shipped to the clinic and stored until the injection visit. Monthly surveys were completed by study participants. RESULTS: The thirty-three patients enrolled in the study were primarily Black (64%) and male (73%). Two participants stopped CAB + RPV LA and transitioned to oral therapy due to allergy (n=1) and efficacy (n=1) concerns. Nearly an equal number of participants elected to receive treatment primarily in clinic (n=16) relative to at home (n=14). Contrary to our expectations, switching the primary location of treatment receipt during the study was uncommon (n=2 to date). Most survey responses to date indicated extreme satisfaction (93%) with treatment. Consistent with reported clinical experience, the most common side effect has been injection site pain/soreness (52% of injections). No differences in safety, efficacy, or satisfaction have been observed based on treatment location with results accruing. CONCLUSION: Administering CAB + RPV LA at home is associated with high satisfaction and thus far is safe and effective. DISCLOSURES: Jamila K. Williams, MHA, Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Stephanie Kirk, PharmD, Viiv Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Eric G. Meissner, MD, PhD, Viiv Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106786872023-11-27 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial Williams, Jamila K Young, Christina Hanson, Rochelle F Moreland-Johnson, Angela Adekunle, Ruth O Kirk, Stephanie Meissner, Eric G Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long acting (CAB + RPV LA) is administered as an intramuscular injection every 1 or 2 months for treatment of HIV-1 infection. The need for frequent travel to a clinic could impair treatment access. We hypothesized that receiving treatment at-home would be as safe and effective as receiving treatment in clinic and that having different options for where to receive treatment would result in high patient satisfaction. METHODS: Persons prescribed CAB + RPV LA in the Infectious Diseases Clinic at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) were offered enrollment in this implementation science study between August 2021 and December 2022. This study was approved by the MUSC IRB. After receiving the initial injection in clinic, study participants chose to receive each subsequent injection over the 12-month intervention in clinic or at home, with option to switch during the study. For home injections, CAB + RPV LA was shipped to participants’ homes and stored refrigerated until preparation and administration by a home health provider. For clinic injections, CAB + RPV LA was shipped to the clinic and stored until the injection visit. Monthly surveys were completed by study participants. RESULTS: The thirty-three patients enrolled in the study were primarily Black (64%) and male (73%). Two participants stopped CAB + RPV LA and transitioned to oral therapy due to allergy (n=1) and efficacy (n=1) concerns. Nearly an equal number of participants elected to receive treatment primarily in clinic (n=16) relative to at home (n=14). Contrary to our expectations, switching the primary location of treatment receipt during the study was uncommon (n=2 to date). Most survey responses to date indicated extreme satisfaction (93%) with treatment. Consistent with reported clinical experience, the most common side effect has been injection site pain/soreness (52% of injections). No differences in safety, efficacy, or satisfaction have been observed based on treatment location with results accruing. CONCLUSION: Administering CAB + RPV LA at home is associated with high satisfaction and thus far is safe and effective. DISCLOSURES: Jamila K. Williams, MHA, Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Stephanie Kirk, PharmD, Viiv Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Eric G. Meissner, MD, PhD, Viiv Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.058 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Williams, Jamila K
Young, Christina
Hanson, Rochelle F
Moreland-Johnson, Angela
Adekunle, Ruth O
Kirk, Stephanie
Meissner, Eric G
1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title_full 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title_fullStr 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title_full_unstemmed 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title_short 1027. At-Home vs. In-Clinic Receipt of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting: An Implementation Science Trial
title_sort 1027. at-home vs. in-clinic receipt of cabotegravir and rilpivirine long-acting: an implementation science trial
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.058
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsjamilak 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT youngchristina 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT hansonrochellef 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT morelandjohnsonangela 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT adekunlerutho 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT kirkstephanie 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial
AT meissnerericg 1027athomevsinclinicreceiptofcabotegravirandrilpivirinelongactinganimplementationsciencetrial