Cargando…
1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082 |
_version_ | 1785150439880130560 |
---|---|
author | Shields, Ryan K Abbo, Lilian M Ackley, Renee Aitken, Samuel L Albrecht, Benjamin Babiker, Ahmed Cifuentes, Renzo Claeys, Kimberly C DeSear, Kathryn Gallagher, Jason C Gregory, Eric Heil, Emily L Hickey, Carissa Klatt, Megan Kline, Ellen G Kubat, Ryan C Kufel, Wesley D Hyoung Lee, Jae Lim, Ahmi Lingg, Theresa MacDougall, Conan Mathers, Amy McCreary, Erin K Moore, William J Olson, Shannon Oxer, Jessica Pearson, Jeffrey C Pham, Christine Polk, Christopher Satlin, Michael J Satola, Sarah W Shah, Sunish Solanki, Yash B Tamma, Pranita Vega, Ana Veena, Venugopalan Veve, Michael Wangchinda, Walaiporn Witt, Lucy S Wu, Janet Pogue, jason M |
author_facet | Shields, Ryan K Abbo, Lilian M Ackley, Renee Aitken, Samuel L Albrecht, Benjamin Babiker, Ahmed Cifuentes, Renzo Claeys, Kimberly C DeSear, Kathryn Gallagher, Jason C Gregory, Eric Heil, Emily L Hickey, Carissa Klatt, Megan Kline, Ellen G Kubat, Ryan C Kufel, Wesley D Hyoung Lee, Jae Lim, Ahmi Lingg, Theresa MacDougall, Conan Mathers, Amy McCreary, Erin K Moore, William J Olson, Shannon Oxer, Jessica Pearson, Jeffrey C Pham, Christine Polk, Christopher Satlin, Michael J Satola, Sarah W Shah, Sunish Solanki, Yash B Tamma, Pranita Vega, Ana Veena, Venugopalan Veve, Michael Wangchinda, Walaiporn Witt, Lucy S Wu, Janet Pogue, jason M |
author_sort | Shields, Ryan K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare the efficacy of CT and CZA among patients with bacteremia or pneumonia due to MDR P. aeruginosa. CT and CZA patients were matched 1:1 within each study site by the presence/absence of septic shock/severe sepsis, infection site, and time to treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical success at day 30 defined as survival, resolution of signs/symptoms with the intended treatment course, and absence of recurrent infections. Patients with cystic fibrosis or COVID-19 infection within 90 days were excluded. RESULTS: 234 patients were included from 20 sites. Patient demographics, severity of illness, infection types, and treatment durations were similar for patients treated with CT or CZA (Table 1). The overall median age was 61 years, 61% were male, and the median Charlson score was 5. At study drug initiation, 77% of patients were in the ICU, 67% received mechanical ventilation and the median SOFA score was 7. 79% of patients were treated for pneumonia; 72% of which occurred in ventilated patients. The median time from index culture to treatment initiation was 72 hours in both groups; CT patients were more likely to receive a prolonged infusion of ≥3 hours (36% vs 19%; P=0.005). Clinical success occurred in 62% and 55% of patients receiving CT and CZA, respectively (P=0.35; Table 1). Corresponding rates of success for pneumonia were 63% and 52%, respectively (P=0.13; Figure 1). All-cause, 30-day mortality rate was 20% and 19%, respectively. Microbiologic failures, recurrent infections, and development of resistance within 90 days were similar between groups. Time to a composite endpoint of recurrent infection or death within 90 days was similar between groups in the overall analysis and the subgroup of patients with pneumonia (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In this interim analysis of the CACTUS study, patients treated with CT and CZA had similar clinical outcomes. We plan to continue enrollment up to 420 patients to detect if any differences exist in the efficacy of CT and CZA for MDR P. aeruginosa infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryan K. Shields, PharmD, MS, Allergan: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Utility: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Ahmed Babiker, MBBS, Roche: Advisor/Consultant Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Speaker|La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Emily L. Heil, PharmD, MS, Wolters Kluwer-LexiComp: Advisor/Consultant Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck and Co: Grant/Research Support Amy Mathers, MD, D(ABMM), Merck: Advisor/Consultant Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|La Jolla (Entasis): Advisor/Consultant|LabSimply: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria Christopher Polk, MD, ViiVHealthcare: Job change to work for ViiV as Medical Director Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Michael Veve, PharmD, MPH, National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support jason M. Pogue, PharmD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10678759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106787592023-11-27 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) Shields, Ryan K Abbo, Lilian M Ackley, Renee Aitken, Samuel L Albrecht, Benjamin Babiker, Ahmed Cifuentes, Renzo Claeys, Kimberly C DeSear, Kathryn Gallagher, Jason C Gregory, Eric Heil, Emily L Hickey, Carissa Klatt, Megan Kline, Ellen G Kubat, Ryan C Kufel, Wesley D Hyoung Lee, Jae Lim, Ahmi Lingg, Theresa MacDougall, Conan Mathers, Amy McCreary, Erin K Moore, William J Olson, Shannon Oxer, Jessica Pearson, Jeffrey C Pham, Christine Polk, Christopher Satlin, Michael J Satola, Sarah W Shah, Sunish Solanki, Yash B Tamma, Pranita Vega, Ana Veena, Venugopalan Veve, Michael Wangchinda, Walaiporn Witt, Lucy S Wu, Janet Pogue, jason M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare the efficacy of CT and CZA among patients with bacteremia or pneumonia due to MDR P. aeruginosa. CT and CZA patients were matched 1:1 within each study site by the presence/absence of septic shock/severe sepsis, infection site, and time to treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical success at day 30 defined as survival, resolution of signs/symptoms with the intended treatment course, and absence of recurrent infections. Patients with cystic fibrosis or COVID-19 infection within 90 days were excluded. RESULTS: 234 patients were included from 20 sites. Patient demographics, severity of illness, infection types, and treatment durations were similar for patients treated with CT or CZA (Table 1). The overall median age was 61 years, 61% were male, and the median Charlson score was 5. At study drug initiation, 77% of patients were in the ICU, 67% received mechanical ventilation and the median SOFA score was 7. 79% of patients were treated for pneumonia; 72% of which occurred in ventilated patients. The median time from index culture to treatment initiation was 72 hours in both groups; CT patients were more likely to receive a prolonged infusion of ≥3 hours (36% vs 19%; P=0.005). Clinical success occurred in 62% and 55% of patients receiving CT and CZA, respectively (P=0.35; Table 1). Corresponding rates of success for pneumonia were 63% and 52%, respectively (P=0.13; Figure 1). All-cause, 30-day mortality rate was 20% and 19%, respectively. Microbiologic failures, recurrent infections, and development of resistance within 90 days were similar between groups. Time to a composite endpoint of recurrent infection or death within 90 days was similar between groups in the overall analysis and the subgroup of patients with pneumonia (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In this interim analysis of the CACTUS study, patients treated with CT and CZA had similar clinical outcomes. We plan to continue enrollment up to 420 patients to detect if any differences exist in the efficacy of CT and CZA for MDR P. aeruginosa infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryan K. Shields, PharmD, MS, Allergan: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Utility: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Ahmed Babiker, MBBS, Roche: Advisor/Consultant Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Speaker|La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Emily L. Heil, PharmD, MS, Wolters Kluwer-LexiComp: Advisor/Consultant Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck and Co: Grant/Research Support Amy Mathers, MD, D(ABMM), Merck: Advisor/Consultant Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|La Jolla (Entasis): Advisor/Consultant|LabSimply: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria Christopher Polk, MD, ViiVHealthcare: Job change to work for ViiV as Medical Director Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Michael Veve, PharmD, MPH, National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support jason M. Pogue, PharmD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Shields, Ryan K Abbo, Lilian M Ackley, Renee Aitken, Samuel L Albrecht, Benjamin Babiker, Ahmed Cifuentes, Renzo Claeys, Kimberly C DeSear, Kathryn Gallagher, Jason C Gregory, Eric Heil, Emily L Hickey, Carissa Klatt, Megan Kline, Ellen G Kubat, Ryan C Kufel, Wesley D Hyoung Lee, Jae Lim, Ahmi Lingg, Theresa MacDougall, Conan Mathers, Amy McCreary, Erin K Moore, William J Olson, Shannon Oxer, Jessica Pearson, Jeffrey C Pham, Christine Polk, Christopher Satlin, Michael J Satola, Sarah W Shah, Sunish Solanki, Yash B Tamma, Pranita Vega, Ana Veena, Venugopalan Veve, Michael Wangchinda, Walaiporn Witt, Lucy S Wu, Janet Pogue, jason M 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title | 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title_full | 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title_fullStr | 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title_full_unstemmed | 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title_short | 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) |
title_sort | 1109. a multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam versus ceftolozane-tazobactam for multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the united states (cactus) |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shieldsryank 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT abbolilianm 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT ackleyrenee 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT aitkensamuell 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT albrechtbenjamin 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT babikerahmed 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT cifuentesrenzo 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT claeyskimberlyc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT desearkathryn 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT gallagherjasonc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT gregoryeric 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT heilemilyl 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT hickeycarissa 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT klattmegan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT klineelleng 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT kubatryanc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT kufelwesleyd 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT hyoungleejae 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT limahmi 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT linggtheresa 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT macdougallconan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT mathersamy 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT mccrearyerink 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT moorewilliamj 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT olsonshannon 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT oxerjessica 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT pearsonjeffreyc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT phamchristine 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT polkchristopher 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT satlinmichaelj 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT satolasarahw 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT shahsunish 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT solankiyashb 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT tammapranita 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT vegaana 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT veenavenugopalan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT vevemichael 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT wangchindawalaiporn 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT wittlucys 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT wujanet 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus AT poguejasonm 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus |