Cargando…

1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Ryan K, Abbo, Lilian M, Ackley, Renee, Aitken, Samuel L, Albrecht, Benjamin, Babiker, Ahmed, Cifuentes, Renzo, Claeys, Kimberly C, DeSear, Kathryn, Gallagher, Jason C, Gregory, Eric, Heil, Emily L, Hickey, Carissa, Klatt, Megan, Kline, Ellen G, Kubat, Ryan C, Kufel, Wesley D, Hyoung Lee, Jae, Lim, Ahmi, Lingg, Theresa, MacDougall, Conan, Mathers, Amy, McCreary, Erin K, Moore, William J, Olson, Shannon, Oxer, Jessica, Pearson, Jeffrey C, Pham, Christine, Polk, Christopher, Satlin, Michael J, Satola, Sarah W, Shah, Sunish, Solanki, Yash B, Tamma, Pranita, Vega, Ana, Veena, Venugopalan, Veve, Michael, Wangchinda, Walaiporn, Witt, Lucy S, Wu, Janet, Pogue, jason M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082
_version_ 1785150439880130560
author Shields, Ryan K
Abbo, Lilian M
Ackley, Renee
Aitken, Samuel L
Albrecht, Benjamin
Babiker, Ahmed
Cifuentes, Renzo
Claeys, Kimberly C
DeSear, Kathryn
Gallagher, Jason C
Gregory, Eric
Heil, Emily L
Hickey, Carissa
Klatt, Megan
Kline, Ellen G
Kubat, Ryan C
Kufel, Wesley D
Hyoung Lee, Jae
Lim, Ahmi
Lingg, Theresa
MacDougall, Conan
Mathers, Amy
McCreary, Erin K
Moore, William J
Olson, Shannon
Oxer, Jessica
Pearson, Jeffrey C
Pham, Christine
Polk, Christopher
Satlin, Michael J
Satola, Sarah W
Shah, Sunish
Solanki, Yash B
Tamma, Pranita
Vega, Ana
Veena, Venugopalan
Veve, Michael
Wangchinda, Walaiporn
Witt, Lucy S
Wu, Janet
Pogue, jason M
author_facet Shields, Ryan K
Abbo, Lilian M
Ackley, Renee
Aitken, Samuel L
Albrecht, Benjamin
Babiker, Ahmed
Cifuentes, Renzo
Claeys, Kimberly C
DeSear, Kathryn
Gallagher, Jason C
Gregory, Eric
Heil, Emily L
Hickey, Carissa
Klatt, Megan
Kline, Ellen G
Kubat, Ryan C
Kufel, Wesley D
Hyoung Lee, Jae
Lim, Ahmi
Lingg, Theresa
MacDougall, Conan
Mathers, Amy
McCreary, Erin K
Moore, William J
Olson, Shannon
Oxer, Jessica
Pearson, Jeffrey C
Pham, Christine
Polk, Christopher
Satlin, Michael J
Satola, Sarah W
Shah, Sunish
Solanki, Yash B
Tamma, Pranita
Vega, Ana
Veena, Venugopalan
Veve, Michael
Wangchinda, Walaiporn
Witt, Lucy S
Wu, Janet
Pogue, jason M
author_sort Shields, Ryan K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare the efficacy of CT and CZA among patients with bacteremia or pneumonia due to MDR P. aeruginosa. CT and CZA patients were matched 1:1 within each study site by the presence/absence of septic shock/severe sepsis, infection site, and time to treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical success at day 30 defined as survival, resolution of signs/symptoms with the intended treatment course, and absence of recurrent infections. Patients with cystic fibrosis or COVID-19 infection within 90 days were excluded. RESULTS: 234 patients were included from 20 sites. Patient demographics, severity of illness, infection types, and treatment durations were similar for patients treated with CT or CZA (Table 1). The overall median age was 61 years, 61% were male, and the median Charlson score was 5. At study drug initiation, 77% of patients were in the ICU, 67% received mechanical ventilation and the median SOFA score was 7. 79% of patients were treated for pneumonia; 72% of which occurred in ventilated patients. The median time from index culture to treatment initiation was 72 hours in both groups; CT patients were more likely to receive a prolonged infusion of ≥3 hours (36% vs 19%; P=0.005). Clinical success occurred in 62% and 55% of patients receiving CT and CZA, respectively (P=0.35; Table 1). Corresponding rates of success for pneumonia were 63% and 52%, respectively (P=0.13; Figure 1). All-cause, 30-day mortality rate was 20% and 19%, respectively. Microbiologic failures, recurrent infections, and development of resistance within 90 days were similar between groups. Time to a composite endpoint of recurrent infection or death within 90 days was similar between groups in the overall analysis and the subgroup of patients with pneumonia (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In this interim analysis of the CACTUS study, patients treated with CT and CZA had similar clinical outcomes. We plan to continue enrollment up to 420 patients to detect if any differences exist in the efficacy of CT and CZA for MDR P. aeruginosa infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryan K. Shields, PharmD, MS, Allergan: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Utility: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Ahmed Babiker, MBBS, Roche: Advisor/Consultant Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Speaker|La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Emily L. Heil, PharmD, MS, Wolters Kluwer-LexiComp: Advisor/Consultant Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck and Co: Grant/Research Support Amy Mathers, MD, D(ABMM), Merck: Advisor/Consultant Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|La Jolla (Entasis): Advisor/Consultant|LabSimply: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria Christopher Polk, MD, ViiVHealthcare: Job change to work for ViiV as Medical Director Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Michael Veve, PharmD, MPH, National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support jason M. Pogue, PharmD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106787592023-11-27 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS) Shields, Ryan K Abbo, Lilian M Ackley, Renee Aitken, Samuel L Albrecht, Benjamin Babiker, Ahmed Cifuentes, Renzo Claeys, Kimberly C DeSear, Kathryn Gallagher, Jason C Gregory, Eric Heil, Emily L Hickey, Carissa Klatt, Megan Kline, Ellen G Kubat, Ryan C Kufel, Wesley D Hyoung Lee, Jae Lim, Ahmi Lingg, Theresa MacDougall, Conan Mathers, Amy McCreary, Erin K Moore, William J Olson, Shannon Oxer, Jessica Pearson, Jeffrey C Pham, Christine Polk, Christopher Satlin, Michael J Satola, Sarah W Shah, Sunish Solanki, Yash B Tamma, Pranita Vega, Ana Veena, Venugopalan Veve, Michael Wangchinda, Walaiporn Witt, Lucy S Wu, Janet Pogue, jason M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) are front-line agents for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, real-world comparative-effectiveness data are lacking. METHODS: CACTUS is a retrospective, matched, multicenter study to compare the efficacy of CT and CZA among patients with bacteremia or pneumonia due to MDR P. aeruginosa. CT and CZA patients were matched 1:1 within each study site by the presence/absence of septic shock/severe sepsis, infection site, and time to treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical success at day 30 defined as survival, resolution of signs/symptoms with the intended treatment course, and absence of recurrent infections. Patients with cystic fibrosis or COVID-19 infection within 90 days were excluded. RESULTS: 234 patients were included from 20 sites. Patient demographics, severity of illness, infection types, and treatment durations were similar for patients treated with CT or CZA (Table 1). The overall median age was 61 years, 61% were male, and the median Charlson score was 5. At study drug initiation, 77% of patients were in the ICU, 67% received mechanical ventilation and the median SOFA score was 7. 79% of patients were treated for pneumonia; 72% of which occurred in ventilated patients. The median time from index culture to treatment initiation was 72 hours in both groups; CT patients were more likely to receive a prolonged infusion of ≥3 hours (36% vs 19%; P=0.005). Clinical success occurred in 62% and 55% of patients receiving CT and CZA, respectively (P=0.35; Table 1). Corresponding rates of success for pneumonia were 63% and 52%, respectively (P=0.13; Figure 1). All-cause, 30-day mortality rate was 20% and 19%, respectively. Microbiologic failures, recurrent infections, and development of resistance within 90 days were similar between groups. Time to a composite endpoint of recurrent infection or death within 90 days was similar between groups in the overall analysis and the subgroup of patients with pneumonia (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In this interim analysis of the CACTUS study, patients treated with CT and CZA had similar clinical outcomes. We plan to continue enrollment up to 420 patients to detect if any differences exist in the efficacy of CT and CZA for MDR P. aeruginosa infections. DISCLOSURES: Ryan K. Shields, PharmD, MS, Allergan: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Utility: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Advisor/Consultant|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Ahmed Babiker, MBBS, Roche: Advisor/Consultant Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux Inc.: Speaker|La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Emily L. Heil, PharmD, MS, Wolters Kluwer-LexiComp: Advisor/Consultant Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Merck and Co: Grant/Research Support Amy Mathers, MD, D(ABMM), Merck: Advisor/Consultant Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|La Jolla (Entasis): Advisor/Consultant|LabSimply: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria Christopher Polk, MD, ViiVHealthcare: Job change to work for ViiV as Medical Director Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Michael Veve, PharmD, MPH, National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support jason M. Pogue, PharmD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678759/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Shields, Ryan K
Abbo, Lilian M
Ackley, Renee
Aitken, Samuel L
Albrecht, Benjamin
Babiker, Ahmed
Cifuentes, Renzo
Claeys, Kimberly C
DeSear, Kathryn
Gallagher, Jason C
Gregory, Eric
Heil, Emily L
Hickey, Carissa
Klatt, Megan
Kline, Ellen G
Kubat, Ryan C
Kufel, Wesley D
Hyoung Lee, Jae
Lim, Ahmi
Lingg, Theresa
MacDougall, Conan
Mathers, Amy
McCreary, Erin K
Moore, William J
Olson, Shannon
Oxer, Jessica
Pearson, Jeffrey C
Pham, Christine
Polk, Christopher
Satlin, Michael J
Satola, Sarah W
Shah, Sunish
Solanki, Yash B
Tamma, Pranita
Vega, Ana
Veena, Venugopalan
Veve, Michael
Wangchinda, Walaiporn
Witt, Lucy S
Wu, Janet
Pogue, jason M
1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title_full 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title_fullStr 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title_full_unstemmed 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title_short 1109. A multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the United States (CACTUS)
title_sort 1109. a multicenter, observational study to compare the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam versus ceftolozane-tazobactam for multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the united states (cactus)
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678759/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.082
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldsryank 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT abbolilianm 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT ackleyrenee 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT aitkensamuell 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT albrechtbenjamin 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT babikerahmed 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT cifuentesrenzo 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT claeyskimberlyc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT desearkathryn 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT gallagherjasonc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT gregoryeric 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT heilemilyl 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT hickeycarissa 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT klattmegan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT klineelleng 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT kubatryanc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT kufelwesleyd 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT hyoungleejae 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT limahmi 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT linggtheresa 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT macdougallconan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT mathersamy 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT mccrearyerink 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT moorewilliamj 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT olsonshannon 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT oxerjessica 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT pearsonjeffreyc 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT phamchristine 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT polkchristopher 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT satlinmichaelj 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT satolasarahw 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT shahsunish 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT solankiyashb 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT tammapranita 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT vegaana 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT veenavenugopalan 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT vevemichael 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT wangchindawalaiporn 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT wittlucys 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT wujanet 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus
AT poguejasonm 1109amulticenterobservationalstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofceftazidimeavibactamversusceftolozanetazobactamformultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosainfectionsintheunitedstatescactus