Cargando…

983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study

BACKGROUND: Infections after LT are common, but standard of care testing (SOCT) often fails to identify a cause. We prospectively compared longitudinal mcfDNA sequencing vs SOCT to determine the utility of mcfDNA sequencing for infection surveillance after LT. METHODS: Single center prospective obse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haidar, Ghady, Friday, Kelly, Musgrove, Christopher, Wang, Xiaohong, Pisarra, Angela, Hughes Kramer, Kailey, Noda, Kentaro, Ryssel, Naomi, Craig, Andrew, Blauwkamp, Timothy A, Morrell, Matthew, Hage, Chadi, Snyder, Mark, Sanchez, Pablo, Morris, Alison, Kitsios, Georgios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678799/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.038
_version_ 1785150447903834112
author Haidar, Ghady
Friday, Kelly
Musgrove, Christopher
Wang, Xiaohong
Pisarra, Angela
Hughes Kramer, Kailey
Noda, Kentaro
Ryssel, Naomi
Craig, Andrew
Blauwkamp, Timothy A
Morrell, Matthew
Hage, Chadi
Snyder, Mark
Sanchez, Pablo
Morris, Alison
Kitsios, Georgios
author_facet Haidar, Ghady
Friday, Kelly
Musgrove, Christopher
Wang, Xiaohong
Pisarra, Angela
Hughes Kramer, Kailey
Noda, Kentaro
Ryssel, Naomi
Craig, Andrew
Blauwkamp, Timothy A
Morrell, Matthew
Hage, Chadi
Snyder, Mark
Sanchez, Pablo
Morris, Alison
Kitsios, Georgios
author_sort Haidar, Ghady
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infections after LT are common, but standard of care testing (SOCT) often fails to identify a cause. We prospectively compared longitudinal mcfDNA sequencing vs SOCT to determine the utility of mcfDNA sequencing for infection surveillance after LT. METHODS: Single center prospective observational study of new LT patients (pts). We collected plasma on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 30 post LT for mcfDNA sequencing; results were not available clinically. We reviewed outcomes and SOCT through 6 months (mo). RESULTS: We enrolled 30 LT pts (4/2021-12/2022, Table 1). 93.3% (28/30) received broad-spectrum antibiotics, although only 40.0% (12/30) had SOCT yielding pathogenic bacteria. 43.33% (13/30) had unexplained leukocytosis. Table 2 shows serial mcfDNA sequencing results, clinical course, and adjudication of mcfDNA sequencing. 96% (29/30) had at least 1 positive mcfDNA sequencing test, including 68.75% (11/16) with presumed infection or unexplained leukocytosis and negative SOCT, but diversity of organisms on mcfDNA sequencing, e.g., Candida, oral or gastrointestinal commensals, Enterococci, or obligate pathogens (Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, others); most had polymicrobial mcfDNA sequencing results. In 36.67% (11/30), mcfDNA sequencing detected pathogens of unclear significance (potential false positive, FP). In 8 pts with positive SOCT, mcfDNA sequencing did not detect at least 1 pathogen found on SOCT. In 13% (4/30), mcfDNA sequencing detected a pathogen before it was detected by SOCT (n=1 each): VRE surgical site infection (SSI), invasive candidiasis, Enterobacter pneumonia, and M. hominis SSI (a known donor-derived syndrome) with HHV-8/Kaposi Sarcoma [presumed donor-derived due to donor risk factors, diagnosed on autopsy, pt 19]. Table 1. [Figure: see text] Table 2 legend. [Figure: see text] Table 2. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Plasma mcfDNA sequencing revealed potential occult explanations for unexplained leukocytosis and infectious syndromes with negative SOCT early post LT. mcfDNA sequencing also detected infection earlier than SOCT in 4 pts but did not detect known pathogens from 8 pts; > 1/3 had presumed FP mcfDNA sequencing results. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the utility of mcfDNA sequencing in diagnosing infection, optimizing antibiotic use, and monitoring donor-derived infection post LT. DISCLOSURES: Ghady Haidar, MD, Allovir: Grant/Research Support|AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|NIH: Grant/Research Support Timothy A. Blauwkamp, PhD, Karius: Board Member|Karius: Ownership Interest Georgios Kitsios, MD, PhD, Karius, Inc: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106787992023-11-27 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study Haidar, Ghady Friday, Kelly Musgrove, Christopher Wang, Xiaohong Pisarra, Angela Hughes Kramer, Kailey Noda, Kentaro Ryssel, Naomi Craig, Andrew Blauwkamp, Timothy A Morrell, Matthew Hage, Chadi Snyder, Mark Sanchez, Pablo Morris, Alison Kitsios, Georgios Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Infections after LT are common, but standard of care testing (SOCT) often fails to identify a cause. We prospectively compared longitudinal mcfDNA sequencing vs SOCT to determine the utility of mcfDNA sequencing for infection surveillance after LT. METHODS: Single center prospective observational study of new LT patients (pts). We collected plasma on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 30 post LT for mcfDNA sequencing; results were not available clinically. We reviewed outcomes and SOCT through 6 months (mo). RESULTS: We enrolled 30 LT pts (4/2021-12/2022, Table 1). 93.3% (28/30) received broad-spectrum antibiotics, although only 40.0% (12/30) had SOCT yielding pathogenic bacteria. 43.33% (13/30) had unexplained leukocytosis. Table 2 shows serial mcfDNA sequencing results, clinical course, and adjudication of mcfDNA sequencing. 96% (29/30) had at least 1 positive mcfDNA sequencing test, including 68.75% (11/16) with presumed infection or unexplained leukocytosis and negative SOCT, but diversity of organisms on mcfDNA sequencing, e.g., Candida, oral or gastrointestinal commensals, Enterococci, or obligate pathogens (Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, others); most had polymicrobial mcfDNA sequencing results. In 36.67% (11/30), mcfDNA sequencing detected pathogens of unclear significance (potential false positive, FP). In 8 pts with positive SOCT, mcfDNA sequencing did not detect at least 1 pathogen found on SOCT. In 13% (4/30), mcfDNA sequencing detected a pathogen before it was detected by SOCT (n=1 each): VRE surgical site infection (SSI), invasive candidiasis, Enterobacter pneumonia, and M. hominis SSI (a known donor-derived syndrome) with HHV-8/Kaposi Sarcoma [presumed donor-derived due to donor risk factors, diagnosed on autopsy, pt 19]. Table 1. [Figure: see text] Table 2 legend. [Figure: see text] Table 2. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Plasma mcfDNA sequencing revealed potential occult explanations for unexplained leukocytosis and infectious syndromes with negative SOCT early post LT. mcfDNA sequencing also detected infection earlier than SOCT in 4 pts but did not detect known pathogens from 8 pts; > 1/3 had presumed FP mcfDNA sequencing results. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the utility of mcfDNA sequencing in diagnosing infection, optimizing antibiotic use, and monitoring donor-derived infection post LT. DISCLOSURES: Ghady Haidar, MD, Allovir: Grant/Research Support|AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|NIH: Grant/Research Support Timothy A. Blauwkamp, PhD, Karius: Board Member|Karius: Ownership Interest Georgios Kitsios, MD, PhD, Karius, Inc: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678799/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.038 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Haidar, Ghady
Friday, Kelly
Musgrove, Christopher
Wang, Xiaohong
Pisarra, Angela
Hughes Kramer, Kailey
Noda, Kentaro
Ryssel, Naomi
Craig, Andrew
Blauwkamp, Timothy A
Morrell, Matthew
Hage, Chadi
Snyder, Mark
Sanchez, Pablo
Morris, Alison
Kitsios, Georgios
983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title_full 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title_fullStr 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title_full_unstemmed 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title_short 983. Use of plasma-based microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (LT): a prospective, observational, pilot study
title_sort 983. use of plasma-based microbial cell-free dna (mcfdna) sequencing for surveillance of infection in the 1st month after lung transplant (lt): a prospective, observational, pilot study
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678799/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.038
work_keys_str_mv AT haidarghady 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT fridaykelly 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT musgrovechristopher 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT wangxiaohong 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT pisarraangela 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT hugheskramerkailey 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT nodakentaro 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT rysselnaomi 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT craigandrew 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT blauwkamptimothya 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT morrellmatthew 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT hagechadi 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT snydermark 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT sanchezpablo 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT morrisalison 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy
AT kitsiosgeorgios 983useofplasmabasedmicrobialcellfreednamcfdnasequencingforsurveillanceofinfectioninthe1stmonthafterlungtransplantltaprospectiveobservationalpilotstudy