Cargando…

676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions

BACKGROUND: C. difficile infection (CDI) is a common health care-associated infection and quality measure for hospitals. The use of diagnostic stewardship interventions have been shown to decrease the rates of CDI by guiding appropriate testing using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), which ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Jennifer L, Vizina, Ann, Hempel, Laura, Kuhn, Ryan, Dhar, Sorabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678902/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.738
_version_ 1785150467160932352
author Johnson, Jennifer L
Vizina, Ann
Hempel, Laura
Kuhn, Ryan
Dhar, Sorabh
author_facet Johnson, Jennifer L
Vizina, Ann
Hempel, Laura
Kuhn, Ryan
Dhar, Sorabh
author_sort Johnson, Jennifer L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: C. difficile infection (CDI) is a common health care-associated infection and quality measure for hospitals. The use of diagnostic stewardship interventions have been shown to decrease the rates of CDI by guiding appropriate testing using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), which are highly sensitive but cannot differentiate between colonization and infection (i.e. lack clinical specificity). Cell culture cytotoxic assay (the “gold standard” test) has limited use in real time diagnosis, however may play a role in validating and augment the impact of diagnostic stewardship reductions in CDI. METHODS: This single center, retrospective review evaluated the utilization of a cytotoxic assay on clinical patient stool samples that met the criteria for diagnostic testing using NAAT as part of a diagnostic stewardship intervention for appropriate C. difficile testing. Samples that were positive for NAAT from 9/11/2018 to 4/11/2023 were concurrently sent for cell culture cytotoxic assay to verify the clinical suspicion of infection from C. difficile and the results reviewed by the multidisciplinary care and quality team for clinical correlation. RESULTS: Of the thirty-seven specimens that tested positive for CDI by NAAT, twenty-eight tested positive on the cytotoxic assay (a total 75.7% of specimen with positive NAAT had concordance with the cytotoxic assay). After clinical adjudication, a decrease of 13 days of therapy (DOT) for vancomycin, 3 DOT for fidaxomicin, and total cost saving of $739.50 was noted after adjustments to therapy. Average turnaround time for the cytotoxic assay was 7.1 days (SD = 3.8). CONCLUSION: While limited as a real-time diagnostic assay for CDI, use of the cell culture cytotoxic assay validates the impact of diagnostic stewardship interventions and improves the specificity of testing when utilized in a sequential testing algorithm with NAAT. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106789022023-11-27 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions Johnson, Jennifer L Vizina, Ann Hempel, Laura Kuhn, Ryan Dhar, Sorabh Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: C. difficile infection (CDI) is a common health care-associated infection and quality measure for hospitals. The use of diagnostic stewardship interventions have been shown to decrease the rates of CDI by guiding appropriate testing using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), which are highly sensitive but cannot differentiate between colonization and infection (i.e. lack clinical specificity). Cell culture cytotoxic assay (the “gold standard” test) has limited use in real time diagnosis, however may play a role in validating and augment the impact of diagnostic stewardship reductions in CDI. METHODS: This single center, retrospective review evaluated the utilization of a cytotoxic assay on clinical patient stool samples that met the criteria for diagnostic testing using NAAT as part of a diagnostic stewardship intervention for appropriate C. difficile testing. Samples that were positive for NAAT from 9/11/2018 to 4/11/2023 were concurrently sent for cell culture cytotoxic assay to verify the clinical suspicion of infection from C. difficile and the results reviewed by the multidisciplinary care and quality team for clinical correlation. RESULTS: Of the thirty-seven specimens that tested positive for CDI by NAAT, twenty-eight tested positive on the cytotoxic assay (a total 75.7% of specimen with positive NAAT had concordance with the cytotoxic assay). After clinical adjudication, a decrease of 13 days of therapy (DOT) for vancomycin, 3 DOT for fidaxomicin, and total cost saving of $739.50 was noted after adjustments to therapy. Average turnaround time for the cytotoxic assay was 7.1 days (SD = 3.8). CONCLUSION: While limited as a real-time diagnostic assay for CDI, use of the cell culture cytotoxic assay validates the impact of diagnostic stewardship interventions and improves the specificity of testing when utilized in a sequential testing algorithm with NAAT. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678902/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.738 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Johnson, Jennifer L
Vizina, Ann
Hempel, Laura
Kuhn, Ryan
Dhar, Sorabh
676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title_full 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title_fullStr 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title_full_unstemmed 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title_short 676. Assessment of Sequential Testing for C. Difficile infections Utilizing Nucleic Amplification Test (NAAT) and Confirmatory Cytotoxic Assay on Diagnostic Stewardship Interventions
title_sort 676. assessment of sequential testing for c. difficile infections utilizing nucleic amplification test (naat) and confirmatory cytotoxic assay on diagnostic stewardship interventions
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678902/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.738
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjenniferl 676assessmentofsequentialtestingforcdifficileinfectionsutilizingnucleicamplificationtestnaatandconfirmatorycytotoxicassayondiagnosticstewardshipinterventions
AT vizinaann 676assessmentofsequentialtestingforcdifficileinfectionsutilizingnucleicamplificationtestnaatandconfirmatorycytotoxicassayondiagnosticstewardshipinterventions
AT hempellaura 676assessmentofsequentialtestingforcdifficileinfectionsutilizingnucleicamplificationtestnaatandconfirmatorycytotoxicassayondiagnosticstewardshipinterventions
AT kuhnryan 676assessmentofsequentialtestingforcdifficileinfectionsutilizingnucleicamplificationtestnaatandconfirmatorycytotoxicassayondiagnosticstewardshipinterventions
AT dharsorabh 676assessmentofsequentialtestingforcdifficileinfectionsutilizingnucleicamplificationtestnaatandconfirmatorycytotoxicassayondiagnosticstewardshipinterventions