Cargando…

2386. Examining Ways to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake through Motivational Interviewing

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the U.S. has been poor especially among children. We are conducting a study evaluating 2 theoretically informed strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. METHODS: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trail (SMART) design is being conducted where pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reyes, Summer M, Reyes, Sydney A, Walsh, Tyler, SHELLEY, Jamee T, Agha, Humza, Torres, Ana V, Prater, Jasmine, Smith, Gabrielle D, Barksdale, Nicholas, Lindsay, Ryan R, Malone, Sara, Newland, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678967/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2006
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the U.S. has been poor especially among children. We are conducting a study evaluating 2 theoretically informed strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. METHODS: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trail (SMART) design is being conducted where participants are randomized into receiving a text message with a link to COVID-19 vaccine resources or a motivational interview (MI). After 2 weeks, if the person is still not vaccinated, they are re-randomized to one of the same two strategies. Participants were eligible if they were completely unvaccinated or not up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines AND were a resident of St. Louis City or St. Louis County OR a school community member in one of our partnering school districts. RESULTS: 171 individuals have participated in the trial. The median age was 28 (IQR 12-42) Of these, 107 were Black (63%), 44 White (26%), and 114 (67%) female (Table 1). 130 (76%) participants had received the flu vaccination before while only 42 (25%) had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine. A majority (65%) had private insurance; however, 3% had no insurance. Of those who received MI, the average response for importance (1= least, 10=most) of general vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines to one’s health was 7.86 and 4.06, respectively (Table 2). Ten was the most common response of participants for importance of general vaccines and 0 for importance of COVID-19 vaccines and readiness overall. Compared to COVID-19 vaccines, general vaccines had a higher importance overall and at intervention 1 and 2 time points (Figure 1a, b, & c). The four individuals received a COVID-19 vaccine during the study all received a MI call (3 had call as their only intervention while 1 had call then text). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: General vaccines were regarded more highly than COVID-19 vaccines. With the continuation of this study as well as further analysis in participants’ reasons for their numerical responses, we can further understand why participants view these vaccines differently, what can be done to improve thoughts on COVID-19 vaccines, and increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. DISCLOSURES: Jason Newland, MD, Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support