Cargando…

531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are known to be relatively safe for long-term use in inflammatory respiratory diseases, and it has been repurposed as one of the potential therapies for outpatients with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). However, ICS have not been accepted for COVID-19 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jeong, Su Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679077/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.600
_version_ 1785150508616384512
author Jeong, Su Jin
author_facet Jeong, Su Jin
author_sort Jeong, Su Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are known to be relatively safe for long-term use in inflammatory respiratory diseases, and it has been repurposed as one of the potential therapies for outpatients with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). However, ICS have not been accepted for COVID-19 as a standard therapy because of its lack of proven benefits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICS in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of ICS treatment in patients with COVID-19 were identified through literature electronic databases searches up to March 10, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted for predefined outcomes, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach. RESULTS: Overall seven trials (eight articles) were included in this systematic review. Compared with usual care, ICS was associated with significantly improved clinical recovery at 7 and 14 days in patients with COVID-19. In subgroup analysis, only budesonide showed significant efficacy in clinical recovery, whereas no significant benefit was observed for ciclesonide. Moreover, ICS use was not significantly associated with all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, admission to intensive care unit, or the use of mechanical ventilation. Our systematic review used evidence with very low to moderate certainty. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis revealed the clinical efficacy of ICS treatment compared with usual care. Based on limited evidence, our results suggest that ICS treatment, especially budesonide, improves the clinical recovery of patients with COVID-19. The safety of ICS treatment in patients with COVID-19 has not yet been established; however, ICS are relatively safe and widely available. In addition, short-term ICS use in the early stages of COVID-19 did not increase the risk of pulmonary infections or side effects. Subsequent randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients, as well as meta-analyses, are needed to determine the usefulness of ICS treatment in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106790772023-11-27 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Jeong, Su Jin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are known to be relatively safe for long-term use in inflammatory respiratory diseases, and it has been repurposed as one of the potential therapies for outpatients with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). However, ICS have not been accepted for COVID-19 as a standard therapy because of its lack of proven benefits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICS in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of ICS treatment in patients with COVID-19 were identified through literature electronic databases searches up to March 10, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted for predefined outcomes, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach. RESULTS: Overall seven trials (eight articles) were included in this systematic review. Compared with usual care, ICS was associated with significantly improved clinical recovery at 7 and 14 days in patients with COVID-19. In subgroup analysis, only budesonide showed significant efficacy in clinical recovery, whereas no significant benefit was observed for ciclesonide. Moreover, ICS use was not significantly associated with all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, admission to intensive care unit, or the use of mechanical ventilation. Our systematic review used evidence with very low to moderate certainty. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis revealed the clinical efficacy of ICS treatment compared with usual care. Based on limited evidence, our results suggest that ICS treatment, especially budesonide, improves the clinical recovery of patients with COVID-19. The safety of ICS treatment in patients with COVID-19 has not yet been established; however, ICS are relatively safe and widely available. In addition, short-term ICS use in the early stages of COVID-19 did not increase the risk of pulmonary infections or side effects. Subsequent randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients, as well as meta-analyses, are needed to determine the usefulness of ICS treatment in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679077/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.600 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Jeong, Su Jin
531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short 531. Clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort 531. clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with coronavirus disease-2019: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679077/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.600
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongsujin 531clinicalefficacyofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019anupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis