Cargando…
2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation
BACKGROUND: Baricitinib and tocilizumab are potent immunomodulators that can reduce mortality in severe and critical COVID-19. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who were treated with either baricitinib or tocilizumab. METHODS: This was a single-center,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2260 |
_version_ | 1785150530079686656 |
---|---|
author | Radziszewski, Skyler Swamy, Siddharth Jain, Ruchi Bicking, Keri Nyirenda, Themba |
author_facet | Radziszewski, Skyler Swamy, Siddharth Jain, Ruchi Bicking, Keri Nyirenda, Themba |
author_sort | Radziszewski, Skyler |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Baricitinib and tocilizumab are potent immunomodulators that can reduce mortality in severe and critical COVID-19. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who were treated with either baricitinib or tocilizumab. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review. Patients were included if they were adults hospitalized with COVID-19 between January 2021 and October 2022 and received baricitinib or tocilizumab. Patients were excluded if they received both agents. Data collection included patient demographics and the predominant variant circulating at time of admission. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with clinical improvement at day 14 after immunomodulator initiation. Clinical improvement was defined as a two point improvement on a six-point ordinal scale or hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement at days 7 and 28 after immunomodulator initiation, progression to mechanical ventilation or ICU care, in-hospital mortality, and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). RESULTS: Four hundred eleven patients were included, of whom 168 received baricitinib and 243 received tocilizumab. Due to availability, baricitinib was used when the Delta and Omicron variants were dominant, and tocilizumab was used throughout the entire study period. There was no significant difference in percentage of patients with clinical improvement at day 14 after immunomodulator initiation (35% versus 36%, p=0.82). Progression to mechanical ventilation (MV) or ICU care occurred significantly less frequently in baricitinib recipients compared to tocilizumab recipients (47% versus 57%, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed for in-hospital mortality, clinical improvement at days 7 and 28 after immunomodulator initiation, and incidence of VTE. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib and tocilizumab appear to produce similar clinical outcomes in patients with severe or critical COVID-19. Baricitinib recipients had decreased progression to MV or ICU care, however, it remains unclear whether this outcome was influenced by changes in standard of care and circulating variants at different time points throughout the pandemic. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10679165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106791652023-11-27 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation Radziszewski, Skyler Swamy, Siddharth Jain, Ruchi Bicking, Keri Nyirenda, Themba Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Baricitinib and tocilizumab are potent immunomodulators that can reduce mortality in severe and critical COVID-19. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who were treated with either baricitinib or tocilizumab. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review. Patients were included if they were adults hospitalized with COVID-19 between January 2021 and October 2022 and received baricitinib or tocilizumab. Patients were excluded if they received both agents. Data collection included patient demographics and the predominant variant circulating at time of admission. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with clinical improvement at day 14 after immunomodulator initiation. Clinical improvement was defined as a two point improvement on a six-point ordinal scale or hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement at days 7 and 28 after immunomodulator initiation, progression to mechanical ventilation or ICU care, in-hospital mortality, and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). RESULTS: Four hundred eleven patients were included, of whom 168 received baricitinib and 243 received tocilizumab. Due to availability, baricitinib was used when the Delta and Omicron variants were dominant, and tocilizumab was used throughout the entire study period. There was no significant difference in percentage of patients with clinical improvement at day 14 after immunomodulator initiation (35% versus 36%, p=0.82). Progression to mechanical ventilation (MV) or ICU care occurred significantly less frequently in baricitinib recipients compared to tocilizumab recipients (47% versus 57%, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed for in-hospital mortality, clinical improvement at days 7 and 28 after immunomodulator initiation, and incidence of VTE. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib and tocilizumab appear to produce similar clinical outcomes in patients with severe or critical COVID-19. Baricitinib recipients had decreased progression to MV or ICU care, however, it remains unclear whether this outcome was influenced by changes in standard of care and circulating variants at different time points throughout the pandemic. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2260 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Radziszewski, Skyler Swamy, Siddharth Jain, Ruchi Bicking, Keri Nyirenda, Themba 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title | 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title_full | 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title_fullStr | 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title_short | 2648. Taming the Cytokine Storm: Baricitinib versus Tocilizumab for COVID-19 Hyperinflammation |
title_sort | 2648. taming the cytokine storm: baricitinib versus tocilizumab for covid-19 hyperinflammation |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radziszewskiskyler 2648tamingthecytokinestormbaricitinibversustocilizumabforcovid19hyperinflammation AT swamysiddharth 2648tamingthecytokinestormbaricitinibversustocilizumabforcovid19hyperinflammation AT jainruchi 2648tamingthecytokinestormbaricitinibversustocilizumabforcovid19hyperinflammation AT bickingkeri 2648tamingthecytokinestormbaricitinibversustocilizumabforcovid19hyperinflammation AT nyirendathemba 2648tamingthecytokinestormbaricitinibversustocilizumabforcovid19hyperinflammation |