Cargando…

85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND: Recently, a global, active-controlled Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR vs. COL for patients with Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including multidrug resistant strains. Both arms were dosed on a background of imipenem/cilastatin (I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Alita, McLeod, Sarah, Shapiro, Adam B, Rana, Khurram, Altarac, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679224/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.001
_version_ 1785150544279502848
author Miller, Alita
McLeod, Sarah
Shapiro, Adam B
Rana, Khurram
Altarac, David
author_facet Miller, Alita
McLeod, Sarah
Shapiro, Adam B
Rana, Khurram
Altarac, David
author_sort Miller, Alita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a global, active-controlled Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR vs. COL for patients with Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including multidrug resistant strains. Both arms were dosed on a background of imipenem/cilastatin (IMI) to treat co-infecting Gram-negative pathogens. 33% of infections in the primary efficacy population were polymicrobial. METHODS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of SUL-DUR, colistin and imipenem against baseline isolates were determined by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with carbapenem-resistant ABC at baseline (CRABC m-MITT). Clinical and microbiological outcomes were evaluated at Test of Cure (TOC). RESULTS: 28D ACM, clinical and microbiological outcomes were similar for patients in the SUL-DUR arm with either monomicrobial or polymicrobial ABC infections while patients in the COL arm with monomicrobial ABC infections had higher mortality rates with worse clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to those with polymicrobial infections (Table 1). Of the 12 patients in the SUL-DUR arm who did not survive to 28 days, 4 (33.3%) were attributed to the index infection (2 of 6 [33.3%] for both monomicrobial and polymicrobial ABC infections). Of the 20 patients in the COL arm who did not survive to 28 days, 10 (50%) were attributed to the index infection (7 of 15 [46.7%] with monomicrobial ABC infections and 3 of 5 [60%] with polymicrobial ABC infections) (Table 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: SUL-DUR was equally efficacious in patients with monomicrobial vs. polymicrobial ABC baseline infections and an equal percentage of deaths (33%) were attributable to the index infection in each sub-group. Although fewer patients in the COL arm died with polymicrobial ABC infections (5 of 20, 25%) than monomicrobial ABC infections (15 of 20, 75%), 60% of the former (3 of 5) were attributable to polymicrobial ABC infections while 46.7% of the latter (7 of 15) were attributable to monomicrobial ABC infections. These results suggest that, if approved, the use of SUL-DUR plus a carbapenem could be an effective approach to treat polymicrobial infections that include ABC. DISCLOSURES: Alita Miller, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: employee|Entasis Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Sarah McLeod, PhD, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Adam B. Shapiro, Ph.D, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Khurram Rana, PharmD, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds David Altarac, MD, MPA, Entasis Therapeutics: Full Time Employee
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106792242023-11-27 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial Miller, Alita McLeod, Sarah Shapiro, Adam B Rana, Khurram Altarac, David Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Recently, a global, active-controlled Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR vs. COL for patients with Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including multidrug resistant strains. Both arms were dosed on a background of imipenem/cilastatin (IMI) to treat co-infecting Gram-negative pathogens. 33% of infections in the primary efficacy population were polymicrobial. METHODS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of SUL-DUR, colistin and imipenem against baseline isolates were determined by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with carbapenem-resistant ABC at baseline (CRABC m-MITT). Clinical and microbiological outcomes were evaluated at Test of Cure (TOC). RESULTS: 28D ACM, clinical and microbiological outcomes were similar for patients in the SUL-DUR arm with either monomicrobial or polymicrobial ABC infections while patients in the COL arm with monomicrobial ABC infections had higher mortality rates with worse clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to those with polymicrobial infections (Table 1). Of the 12 patients in the SUL-DUR arm who did not survive to 28 days, 4 (33.3%) were attributed to the index infection (2 of 6 [33.3%] for both monomicrobial and polymicrobial ABC infections). Of the 20 patients in the COL arm who did not survive to 28 days, 10 (50%) were attributed to the index infection (7 of 15 [46.7%] with monomicrobial ABC infections and 3 of 5 [60%] with polymicrobial ABC infections) (Table 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: SUL-DUR was equally efficacious in patients with monomicrobial vs. polymicrobial ABC baseline infections and an equal percentage of deaths (33%) were attributable to the index infection in each sub-group. Although fewer patients in the COL arm died with polymicrobial ABC infections (5 of 20, 25%) than monomicrobial ABC infections (15 of 20, 75%), 60% of the former (3 of 5) were attributable to polymicrobial ABC infections while 46.7% of the latter (7 of 15) were attributable to monomicrobial ABC infections. These results suggest that, if approved, the use of SUL-DUR plus a carbapenem could be an effective approach to treat polymicrobial infections that include ABC. DISCLOSURES: Alita Miller, PhD, Entasis Therapeutics: employee|Entasis Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Sarah McLeod, PhD, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Adam B. Shapiro, Ph.D, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Khurram Rana, PharmD, Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Employee|Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds David Altarac, MD, MPA, Entasis Therapeutics: Full Time Employee Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679224/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.001 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Miller, Alita
McLeod, Sarah
Shapiro, Adam B
Rana, Khurram
Altarac, David
85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title_full 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title_fullStr 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title_full_unstemmed 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title_short 85. Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) Compared to Colistin (COL) against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex (ABC) Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Infections in a Phase 3 Trial
title_sort 85. efficacy of sulbactam-durlobactam (sul-dur) compared to colistin (col) against acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (abc) monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections in a phase 3 trial
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679224/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.001
work_keys_str_mv AT milleralita 85efficacyofsulbactamdurlobactamsuldurcomparedtocolistincolagainstacinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuscomplexabcmonomicrobialandpolymicrobialinfectionsinaphase3trial
AT mcleodsarah 85efficacyofsulbactamdurlobactamsuldurcomparedtocolistincolagainstacinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuscomplexabcmonomicrobialandpolymicrobialinfectionsinaphase3trial
AT shapiroadamb 85efficacyofsulbactamdurlobactamsuldurcomparedtocolistincolagainstacinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuscomplexabcmonomicrobialandpolymicrobialinfectionsinaphase3trial
AT ranakhurram 85efficacyofsulbactamdurlobactamsuldurcomparedtocolistincolagainstacinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuscomplexabcmonomicrobialandpolymicrobialinfectionsinaphase3trial
AT altaracdavid 85efficacyofsulbactamdurlobactamsuldurcomparedtocolistincolagainstacinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuscomplexabcmonomicrobialandpolymicrobialinfectionsinaphase3trial