Cargando…

2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Previous studies that demonstrated decreased nephrotoxicity with area-under-the-curve (AUC) vancomycin dosing compared to trough monitoring used two levels and a spreadsheet model for calculating AUC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the same reduction in acute kidney injury...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viteri, Alina, Tucker, Natalie, Flynn, Ryan, Foreman, Jena K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2184
_version_ 1785150558930206720
author Viteri, Alina
Tucker, Natalie
Flynn, Ryan
Foreman, Jena K
author_facet Viteri, Alina
Tucker, Natalie
Flynn, Ryan
Foreman, Jena K
author_sort Viteri, Alina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies that demonstrated decreased nephrotoxicity with area-under-the-curve (AUC) vancomycin dosing compared to trough monitoring used two levels and a spreadsheet model for calculating AUC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the same reduction in acute kidney injury (AKI) was achieved while using a single level Bayesian monitoring program. METHODS: This retrospective quasi-experiment was performed at two sites within the same health system. The primary objective was to assess the rate of AKI between vancomycin dosed by trough monitoring as compared to AUC monitoring using a Bayesian software program. Secondary objectives included mean daily dose of vancomycin, number of vancomycin levels, and severity of AKI. Patients were included in the study if they were 18 years or older with at least one vancomycin concentration drawn. Patients were excluded if they had a baseline serum creatine greater than 2 mg/dL, received renal replacement therapy of any type, or received > 1 dose of vancomycin prior to admission. Patients were matched 1:1 based on acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, body mass index, and vancomycin indication. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine the independent association between the monitoring strategy (trough vs AUC) and nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: Few differences in baseline characteristics were identified between groups. More patients were treated for pneumonia, bacteremia, or urinary tract infection in the trough group, whereas more were treated for skin and soft tissue infection in the AUC group. The AUC group (255 patients) had a 16% incidence of AKI in comparison to the trough group (265 patients) with a 19% incidence of AKI (p = 0.517). Of the secondary outcomes, those in the AUC group received lower daily doses than patients in the trough group (p = 0.015). Multivariable regression analysis identified similar results for each of the study outcomes including the primary outcome (OR 1; 95% CI 0.62 – 1.63). CONCLUSION: The use of a single level Bayesian monitoring for vancomycin dosing did not result in a decreased incidence of acute kidney injury when compared to trough monitoring. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106792842023-11-27 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study Viteri, Alina Tucker, Natalie Flynn, Ryan Foreman, Jena K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Previous studies that demonstrated decreased nephrotoxicity with area-under-the-curve (AUC) vancomycin dosing compared to trough monitoring used two levels and a spreadsheet model for calculating AUC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the same reduction in acute kidney injury (AKI) was achieved while using a single level Bayesian monitoring program. METHODS: This retrospective quasi-experiment was performed at two sites within the same health system. The primary objective was to assess the rate of AKI between vancomycin dosed by trough monitoring as compared to AUC monitoring using a Bayesian software program. Secondary objectives included mean daily dose of vancomycin, number of vancomycin levels, and severity of AKI. Patients were included in the study if they were 18 years or older with at least one vancomycin concentration drawn. Patients were excluded if they had a baseline serum creatine greater than 2 mg/dL, received renal replacement therapy of any type, or received > 1 dose of vancomycin prior to admission. Patients were matched 1:1 based on acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, body mass index, and vancomycin indication. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine the independent association between the monitoring strategy (trough vs AUC) and nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: Few differences in baseline characteristics were identified between groups. More patients were treated for pneumonia, bacteremia, or urinary tract infection in the trough group, whereas more were treated for skin and soft tissue infection in the AUC group. The AUC group (255 patients) had a 16% incidence of AKI in comparison to the trough group (265 patients) with a 19% incidence of AKI (p = 0.517). Of the secondary outcomes, those in the AUC group received lower daily doses than patients in the trough group (p = 0.015). Multivariable regression analysis identified similar results for each of the study outcomes including the primary outcome (OR 1; 95% CI 0.62 – 1.63). CONCLUSION: The use of a single level Bayesian monitoring for vancomycin dosing did not result in a decreased incidence of acute kidney injury when compared to trough monitoring. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679284/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2184 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Viteri, Alina
Tucker, Natalie
Flynn, Ryan
Foreman, Jena K
2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_fullStr 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_short 2567. Clinical Outcomes of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Monitoring: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_sort 2567. clinical outcomes of vancomycin area-under-the-curve monitoring: a quasi-experimental study
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2184
work_keys_str_mv AT viterialina 2567clinicaloutcomesofvancomycinareaunderthecurvemonitoringaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT tuckernatalie 2567clinicaloutcomesofvancomycinareaunderthecurvemonitoringaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT flynnryan 2567clinicaloutcomesofvancomycinareaunderthecurvemonitoringaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT foremanjenak 2567clinicaloutcomesofvancomycinareaunderthecurvemonitoringaquasiexperimentalstudy