Cargando…

569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostic methods are commonly used to supplement microscopy and culture in the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). While international guidelines recommend the collection of multiple sputum samples for microscopy and culture due to their low sensitivity, the utili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chia, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.638
_version_ 1785150562057060352
author Chia, Jonathan
author_facet Chia, Jonathan
author_sort Chia, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostic methods are commonly used to supplement microscopy and culture in the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). While international guidelines recommend the collection of multiple sputum samples for microscopy and culture due to their low sensitivity, the utility of performing multiple molecular tests is less well-defined. A retrospective analysis of molecular diagnostic testing in a high pre-test probability population was conducted to determine the impact of repeated testing on achieving diagnosis. METHODS: A review of 10406 requests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, originating from the TB contact screening and treatment clinic of a national Infectious Diseases specialist centre, was conducted for the period of 1 Jan - 31 Dec 2022. 5336 patients with valid test results were identified. (Table 1) PCR testing was performed using the Xpert® MTB/RIF (Cepheid) PCR assay, either in the clinic as a point-of-care test, or in the hospital’s microbiology laboratory. Acid-fast microscopy was performed in the microbiology laboratory using a combination of fluorochrome and Ziehl-Neelsen staining, while cultures were referred to a Biosafety Level 3 laboratory at another institution for culture and susceptibility testing using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Out of 5336 patients identified, 4540 (85.0%) had 2 or more PCR tests performed within the first month of their initial encounter. 443 patients (8.3%) tested PCR-positive in total. 385 tested positive on their first test; further tests after the first identified another 58 cases. Compared to cumulative culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the first PCR test performed in the target population was 65.2% and 98.3% respectively, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8%. Repeat PCR testing increased sensitivity to 69.3% and NPV to 97.5%. (Tables 2 and 3) 74 initially-negative patients would need to be retested to identify an additional PCR-positive case, with potential costs of SGD $14,504 per case ($196 per test). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: For purposes of resource allocation, rationalisation of repeat testing in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB should be considered as an alternative to routine retesting, even in a high-risk population. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106792952023-11-27 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Chia, Jonathan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostic methods are commonly used to supplement microscopy and culture in the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). While international guidelines recommend the collection of multiple sputum samples for microscopy and culture due to their low sensitivity, the utility of performing multiple molecular tests is less well-defined. A retrospective analysis of molecular diagnostic testing in a high pre-test probability population was conducted to determine the impact of repeated testing on achieving diagnosis. METHODS: A review of 10406 requests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, originating from the TB contact screening and treatment clinic of a national Infectious Diseases specialist centre, was conducted for the period of 1 Jan - 31 Dec 2022. 5336 patients with valid test results were identified. (Table 1) PCR testing was performed using the Xpert® MTB/RIF (Cepheid) PCR assay, either in the clinic as a point-of-care test, or in the hospital’s microbiology laboratory. Acid-fast microscopy was performed in the microbiology laboratory using a combination of fluorochrome and Ziehl-Neelsen staining, while cultures were referred to a Biosafety Level 3 laboratory at another institution for culture and susceptibility testing using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Out of 5336 patients identified, 4540 (85.0%) had 2 or more PCR tests performed within the first month of their initial encounter. 443 patients (8.3%) tested PCR-positive in total. 385 tested positive on their first test; further tests after the first identified another 58 cases. Compared to cumulative culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the first PCR test performed in the target population was 65.2% and 98.3% respectively, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8%. Repeat PCR testing increased sensitivity to 69.3% and NPV to 97.5%. (Tables 2 and 3) 74 initially-negative patients would need to be retested to identify an additional PCR-positive case, with potential costs of SGD $14,504 per case ($196 per test). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: For purposes of resource allocation, rationalisation of repeat testing in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB should be considered as an alternative to routine retesting, even in a high-risk population. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679295/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.638 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Chia, Jonathan
569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title_full 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title_fullStr 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title_short 569. Utility of Repeat Molecular Diagnostic Testing in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
title_sort 569. utility of repeat molecular diagnostic testing in the laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.638
work_keys_str_mv AT chiajonathan 569utilityofrepeatmoleculardiagnostictestinginthelaboratorydiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosis