Cargando…

1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?

BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of animal bites is critical to prevent rabies encephalitis and tetanus. In the US, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is typically started in emergency departments (EDs). For travelers seeking care overseas, World Health Organization (WHO) PEP guidance differs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chirumamilla, Siri L, Breiman, Jennifer, Fairley, Jessica K, Wagonner, Jesse J, Collins, Matthew H, Wu, Henry M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1214
_version_ 1785150574535114752
author Chirumamilla, Siri L
Breiman, Jennifer
Fairley, Jessica K
Wagonner, Jesse J
Collins, Matthew H
Wu, Henry M
author_facet Chirumamilla, Siri L
Breiman, Jennifer
Fairley, Jessica K
Wagonner, Jesse J
Collins, Matthew H
Wu, Henry M
author_sort Chirumamilla, Siri L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of animal bites is critical to prevent rabies encephalitis and tetanus. In the US, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is typically started in emergency departments (EDs). For travelers seeking care overseas, World Health Organization (WHO) PEP guidance differs from those of the Advisory Council on Immunization Practices (ACIP). WHO does not recommend rabies immune globulin (RIG) for minor scratches; furthermore, RIG availability can vary worldwide. Outpatient follow-up of patients not given RIG is challenging because RIG is often not given in clinics. We assessed whether patients referred to a travel medicine clinic for rabies PEP vaccination were initially managed in accordance with ACIP guidance. METHODS: Medical records of patients presenting for rabies PEP at the Emory TravelWell Center from 2017-21 were reviewed. Initial management after exposure at the patient’s first healthcare interaction was assessed for consistency with ACIP recommendations for rabies and tetanus PEP. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were seen for rabies PEP from 2017-21. The median age was 38 years (range 5 to 67). Most patients were exposed in the US (71%). Animal bites accounted for most exposures (57%), followed by suspected contact without visible bite or scratch (38%), and scratches (5%). Frequently involved animals were bats (41%), dogs (30%), cats (14%), and monkeys (7%). A tetanus booster was indicated but not given in 59% of patients. Most patients (82%) received ACIP-consistent rabies PEP. Among the 10 patients who did not, seven (70%) had initiated PEP overseas without RIG. Three patients who initiated PEP in the US received PEP that was inconsistent with ACIP guidance; two did not receive RIG and one received gluteal vaccination. None developed symptomatic rabies or tetanus infection. CONCLUSION: Patients seen at a travel clinic for rabies PEP often start it elsewhere, and in this series 18% of patients had PEP initiation inconsistent with ACIP guidance. Returned travelers who initiated PEP in accordance with WHO guidance account for most situations where RIG was not given. Errors in rabies and tetanus PEP also occurred in US EDs. US providers administering rabies and tetanus PEP should ensure practices adhere to ACIP guidance. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106793592023-11-27 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations? Chirumamilla, Siri L Breiman, Jennifer Fairley, Jessica K Wagonner, Jesse J Collins, Matthew H Wu, Henry M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of animal bites is critical to prevent rabies encephalitis and tetanus. In the US, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is typically started in emergency departments (EDs). For travelers seeking care overseas, World Health Organization (WHO) PEP guidance differs from those of the Advisory Council on Immunization Practices (ACIP). WHO does not recommend rabies immune globulin (RIG) for minor scratches; furthermore, RIG availability can vary worldwide. Outpatient follow-up of patients not given RIG is challenging because RIG is often not given in clinics. We assessed whether patients referred to a travel medicine clinic for rabies PEP vaccination were initially managed in accordance with ACIP guidance. METHODS: Medical records of patients presenting for rabies PEP at the Emory TravelWell Center from 2017-21 were reviewed. Initial management after exposure at the patient’s first healthcare interaction was assessed for consistency with ACIP recommendations for rabies and tetanus PEP. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were seen for rabies PEP from 2017-21. The median age was 38 years (range 5 to 67). Most patients were exposed in the US (71%). Animal bites accounted for most exposures (57%), followed by suspected contact without visible bite or scratch (38%), and scratches (5%). Frequently involved animals were bats (41%), dogs (30%), cats (14%), and monkeys (7%). A tetanus booster was indicated but not given in 59% of patients. Most patients (82%) received ACIP-consistent rabies PEP. Among the 10 patients who did not, seven (70%) had initiated PEP overseas without RIG. Three patients who initiated PEP in the US received PEP that was inconsistent with ACIP guidance; two did not receive RIG and one received gluteal vaccination. None developed symptomatic rabies or tetanus infection. CONCLUSION: Patients seen at a travel clinic for rabies PEP often start it elsewhere, and in this series 18% of patients had PEP initiation inconsistent with ACIP guidance. Returned travelers who initiated PEP in accordance with WHO guidance account for most situations where RIG was not given. Errors in rabies and tetanus PEP also occurred in US EDs. US providers administering rabies and tetanus PEP should ensure practices adhere to ACIP guidance. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10679359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1214 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Chirumamilla, Siri L
Breiman, Jennifer
Fairley, Jessica K
Wagonner, Jesse J
Collins, Matthew H
Wu, Henry M
1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title_full 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title_fullStr 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title_full_unstemmed 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title_short 1377. Rabies and Tetanus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation in the US and Overseas: Consistent with ACIP Recommendations?
title_sort 1377. rabies and tetanus post-exposure prophylaxis initiation in the us and overseas: consistent with acip recommendations?
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1214
work_keys_str_mv AT chirumamillasiril 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations
AT breimanjennifer 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations
AT fairleyjessicak 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations
AT wagonnerjessej 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations
AT collinsmatthewh 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations
AT wuhenrym 1377rabiesandtetanuspostexposureprophylaxisinitiationintheusandoverseasconsistentwithaciprecommendations