Cargando…

696. Effectiveness of Oral Vancomycin as Prophylaxis against Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are at increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) due to decreased immune function, frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and chemotherapy, prolonged hospitalizations, and alteration in gut microbiom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitmeyer, Kelly M, Rana, Brijesh, Awad, David A, Huang, Esther, Park, Jiyeon J, Yassin, Arsheena, Mills, John P, Azim, Ahmed Abdul, Bhatt, Pinki, Narayanan, Navaneeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679381/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.758
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are at increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) due to decreased immune function, frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and chemotherapy, prolonged hospitalizations, and alteration in gut microbiome. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) for CDI in all patients admitted for HSCT. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center in New Jersey. Medical records of patients admitted between June 2019 to August 2022 to undergo an allogeneic or autologous HSCT were reviewed. Universal OVP from admission to discharge for HSCT patients began December 2019. Patients ≥ 18 years at the time of admission for the HSCT were included. Patients who were admitted less than 72 hours or who were being treated for an active CDI prior to HSCT were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of in-hospital CDI. Secondary endpoints included incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections, VRE isolated from any clinical culture, gram-negative bloodstream infections, hospital survival, and hospital length of stay. Exploratory endpoints including one-year survival, relapse, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease were also collected. Confounding by relevant covariates were assessed and controlled for in a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: A total of 132 HSCT patients were included. There was one case (1/68, 1.47%) of CDI in the prophylaxis group compared to six CDI cases (6/64, 9.38%) in the no prophylaxis group (P=0.057). There were no significant (P>0.05) between-group differences of incidence of gram-negative bloodstream infections, hospital survival, and length of stay. There were zero clinical cultures positive for VRE in either group. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In-hospital incidence of CDI in HSCT patients was decreased with the use of OVP but did not meet statistical significance. Randomized controlled trials are needed in this high-risk patient population to assess the efficacy and long-term risks of OVP for CDI. DISCLOSURES: Pinki Bhatt, MD, Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Navaneeth Narayanan, PharmD, MPH, BCIDP, Astellas: Honoraria|Beckman Coulter: Honoraria|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support