Cargando…
Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Contouring of gas pockets is a time consuming step in the workflow of adaptive radiotherapy. We would like to better understand which gas pockets electronic densitiy should be used and the dosimetric impact on adaptive MRgRT treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 CT scans of patients und...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1280836 |
_version_ | 1785142137380143104 |
---|---|
author | Nardini, Matteo Meffe, Guenda Galetto, Matteo Boldrini, Luca Chiloiro, Giuditta Romano, Angela Panza, Giulia Bevacqua, Andrea Turco, Gabriele Votta, Claudio Capotosti, Amedeo Moretti, Roberto Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Indovina, Luca Placidi, Lorenzo |
author_facet | Nardini, Matteo Meffe, Guenda Galetto, Matteo Boldrini, Luca Chiloiro, Giuditta Romano, Angela Panza, Giulia Bevacqua, Andrea Turco, Gabriele Votta, Claudio Capotosti, Amedeo Moretti, Roberto Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Indovina, Luca Placidi, Lorenzo |
author_sort | Nardini, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Contouring of gas pockets is a time consuming step in the workflow of adaptive radiotherapy. We would like to better understand which gas pockets electronic densitiy should be used and the dosimetric impact on adaptive MRgRT treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 CT scans of patients undergoing SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Anatomical structures were contoured: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV), stomach (ST), small bowel (SB), large bowel (LB), gas pockets (GAS) and gas in each organ respectively STG, SBG, LBG. Average HU in GAS was converted in RED, the obtained value has been named as Gastrointestinal Gas RED (GIGED). Differences of average HU in GAS, STG, SBG and LBG were computed. Three treatment plans were calculated editing the GAS volume RED that was overwritten with: air RED (0.0012), water RED (1.000), GIGED, generating respectively APLAN, WPLAN and the GPLAN. 2-D dose distributions were analyzed by gamma analysis. Parameter called active gas volume (AGV) was calculated as the intersection of GAS with the isodose of 5% of prescription dose. RESULTS: Average HU value contained in GAS results to be equal to -620. No significative difference was noted between the average HU of gas in different organ at risk. Value of Gamma Passing Rate (GPR) anticorrelates with the AGV for each plan comparison and the threshold value for GPR to fall below 90% is 41, 60 and 139 cc for WPLANvsAPLAN, GPLANvsAPLAN and WPLANvsGPLAN respectively. DISCUSSIONS: GIGED is the right RED for Gastrointestinal Gas. Novel AGV is a useful parameter to evaluate the effect of gas pocket on dose distribution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10679396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106793962023-01-01 Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation Nardini, Matteo Meffe, Guenda Galetto, Matteo Boldrini, Luca Chiloiro, Giuditta Romano, Angela Panza, Giulia Bevacqua, Andrea Turco, Gabriele Votta, Claudio Capotosti, Amedeo Moretti, Roberto Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Indovina, Luca Placidi, Lorenzo Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Contouring of gas pockets is a time consuming step in the workflow of adaptive radiotherapy. We would like to better understand which gas pockets electronic densitiy should be used and the dosimetric impact on adaptive MRgRT treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 CT scans of patients undergoing SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Anatomical structures were contoured: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV), stomach (ST), small bowel (SB), large bowel (LB), gas pockets (GAS) and gas in each organ respectively STG, SBG, LBG. Average HU in GAS was converted in RED, the obtained value has been named as Gastrointestinal Gas RED (GIGED). Differences of average HU in GAS, STG, SBG and LBG were computed. Three treatment plans were calculated editing the GAS volume RED that was overwritten with: air RED (0.0012), water RED (1.000), GIGED, generating respectively APLAN, WPLAN and the GPLAN. 2-D dose distributions were analyzed by gamma analysis. Parameter called active gas volume (AGV) was calculated as the intersection of GAS with the isodose of 5% of prescription dose. RESULTS: Average HU value contained in GAS results to be equal to -620. No significative difference was noted between the average HU of gas in different organ at risk. Value of Gamma Passing Rate (GPR) anticorrelates with the AGV for each plan comparison and the threshold value for GPR to fall below 90% is 41, 60 and 139 cc for WPLANvsAPLAN, GPLANvsAPLAN and WPLANvsGPLAN respectively. DISCUSSIONS: GIGED is the right RED for Gastrointestinal Gas. Novel AGV is a useful parameter to evaluate the effect of gas pocket on dose distribution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10679396/ /pubmed/38023178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1280836 Text en Copyright © 2023 Nardini, Meffe, Galetto, Boldrini, Chiloiro, Romano, Panza, Bevacqua, Turco, Votta, Capotosti, Moretti, Gambacorta, Indovina and Placidi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Nardini, Matteo Meffe, Guenda Galetto, Matteo Boldrini, Luca Chiloiro, Giuditta Romano, Angela Panza, Giulia Bevacqua, Andrea Turco, Gabriele Votta, Claudio Capotosti, Amedeo Moretti, Roberto Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Indovina, Luca Placidi, Lorenzo Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title | Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title_full | Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title_fullStr | Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title_short | Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation |
title_sort | why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive mrgrt: a dosimetric evaluation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1280836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nardinimatteo whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT meffeguenda whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT galettomatteo whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT boldriniluca whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT chiloirogiuditta whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT romanoangela whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT panzagiulia whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT bevacquaandrea whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT turcogabriele whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT vottaclaudio whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT capotostiamedeo whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT morettiroberto whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT gambacortamariaantonietta whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT indovinaluca whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation AT placidilorenzo whyweshouldcareaboutgaspocketsinonlineadaptivemrgrtadosimetricevaluation |