Cargando…
E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review
BACKGROUND: Medication prescribing is essential for the treatment, curing, maintenance, and/or prevention of an illness and disease, however, medication errors remain common. Common errors including prescribing and administration, pose significant risk to patients. Electronic prescribing (e-prescrib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100365 |
_version_ | 1785142172333375488 |
---|---|
author | Cassidy, Christine E. Boulos, Leah McConnell, Erin Barber, Brittany Delahunty-Pike, Alannah Bishop, Andrea Fatima, Nawal Higgins, Amanda Churchill, Megan Lively, Allison MacPhee, Shannon P. Misener, Ruth Martin Sarty, Rowan Wells, Robert Curran, Janet A. |
author_facet | Cassidy, Christine E. Boulos, Leah McConnell, Erin Barber, Brittany Delahunty-Pike, Alannah Bishop, Andrea Fatima, Nawal Higgins, Amanda Churchill, Megan Lively, Allison MacPhee, Shannon P. Misener, Ruth Martin Sarty, Rowan Wells, Robert Curran, Janet A. |
author_sort | Cassidy, Christine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medication prescribing is essential for the treatment, curing, maintenance, and/or prevention of an illness and disease, however, medication errors remain common. Common errors including prescribing and administration, pose significant risk to patients. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is one intervention used to enhance the safety and quality of prescribing by decreasing medication errors and reducing harm. E-prescribing in community-based settings has not been extensively examined. OBJECTIVE: To map and characterize the current evidence on e-prescribing and medication safety in community pharmacy settings. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies reporting on e-prescribing and medication safety. MEDLINE All (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Full Text (EBSCOHost), and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched December 2022 using keywords and MeSH terms related to e-prescribing, medication safety, efficiency, and uptake. Articles were imported to Covidence and screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer using a standardized data extraction form. Findings are reported in accordance with JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis following thematic analysis to narratively describe results. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in this review. Most studies were quantitative (n = 22), non-experimental study designs (n = 16) and were conducted in the United States (n = 18). Half of included studies reported physicians as the prescriber (n = 18), while the remaining reported a mix of nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician assistants (n = 6). Studies reported on types of errors, including prescription errors (n = 20), medication safety errors (n = 9), dispensing errors (n = 2), and administration errors (n = 1). Few studies examined patient health outcomes, such as adverse drug events (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that most research is descriptive in nature and focused primarily on rates of prescription errors. Further research, such as experimental, implementation, and evaluation mixed-methods research, is needed to investigate the effects of e-prescribing on reducing error rates and improving patient and health system outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10679534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106795342023-11-07 E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review Cassidy, Christine E. Boulos, Leah McConnell, Erin Barber, Brittany Delahunty-Pike, Alannah Bishop, Andrea Fatima, Nawal Higgins, Amanda Churchill, Megan Lively, Allison MacPhee, Shannon P. Misener, Ruth Martin Sarty, Rowan Wells, Robert Curran, Janet A. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: Medication prescribing is essential for the treatment, curing, maintenance, and/or prevention of an illness and disease, however, medication errors remain common. Common errors including prescribing and administration, pose significant risk to patients. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is one intervention used to enhance the safety and quality of prescribing by decreasing medication errors and reducing harm. E-prescribing in community-based settings has not been extensively examined. OBJECTIVE: To map and characterize the current evidence on e-prescribing and medication safety in community pharmacy settings. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies reporting on e-prescribing and medication safety. MEDLINE All (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Full Text (EBSCOHost), and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched December 2022 using keywords and MeSH terms related to e-prescribing, medication safety, efficiency, and uptake. Articles were imported to Covidence and screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer using a standardized data extraction form. Findings are reported in accordance with JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis following thematic analysis to narratively describe results. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in this review. Most studies were quantitative (n = 22), non-experimental study designs (n = 16) and were conducted in the United States (n = 18). Half of included studies reported physicians as the prescriber (n = 18), while the remaining reported a mix of nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician assistants (n = 6). Studies reported on types of errors, including prescription errors (n = 20), medication safety errors (n = 9), dispensing errors (n = 2), and administration errors (n = 1). Few studies examined patient health outcomes, such as adverse drug events (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that most research is descriptive in nature and focused primarily on rates of prescription errors. Further research, such as experimental, implementation, and evaluation mixed-methods research, is needed to investigate the effects of e-prescribing on reducing error rates and improving patient and health system outcomes. Elsevier 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10679534/ /pubmed/38023632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100365 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cassidy, Christine E. Boulos, Leah McConnell, Erin Barber, Brittany Delahunty-Pike, Alannah Bishop, Andrea Fatima, Nawal Higgins, Amanda Churchill, Megan Lively, Allison MacPhee, Shannon P. Misener, Ruth Martin Sarty, Rowan Wells, Robert Curran, Janet A. E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title | E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title_full | E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title_fullStr | E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title_short | E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review |
title_sort | e-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: a rapid scoping review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cassidychristinee eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT boulosleah eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT mcconnellerin eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT barberbrittany eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT delahuntypikealannah eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT bishopandrea eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT fatimanawal eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT higginsamanda eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT churchillmegan eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT livelyallison eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT macpheeshannonp eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT misenerruthmartin eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT sartyrowan eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT wellsrobert eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview AT curranjaneta eprescribingandmedicationsafetyincommunitysettingsarapidscopingreview |