Cargando…

The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system

PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslan, Assala, Stevens, Christopher, Aldine, Amro Saad, Mamilly, Ahmed, De Alba, Luis, Arevalo, Octavio, Ahuja, Chaitanya, Cuellar, Hugo H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052
_version_ 1785150613854617600
author Aslan, Assala
Stevens, Christopher
Aldine, Amro Saad
Mamilly, Ahmed
De Alba, Luis
Arevalo, Octavio
Ahuja, Chaitanya
Cuellar, Hugo H.
author_facet Aslan, Assala
Stevens, Christopher
Aldine, Amro Saad
Mamilly, Ahmed
De Alba, Luis
Arevalo, Octavio
Ahuja, Chaitanya
Cuellar, Hugo H.
author_sort Aslan, Assala
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1–68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1–3. CONCLUSION: The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106796112023-12-05 The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system Aslan, Assala Stevens, Christopher Aldine, Amro Saad Mamilly, Ahmed De Alba, Luis Arevalo, Octavio Ahuja, Chaitanya Cuellar, Hugo H. Diagn Interv Radiol Interventional Radiology - Original Article PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1–68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1–3. CONCLUSION: The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously. Galenos Publishing 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10679611/ /pubmed/37070845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052 Text en © Copyright 2023 by Turkish Society of Radiology | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Interventional Radiology - Original Article
Aslan, Assala
Stevens, Christopher
Aldine, Amro Saad
Mamilly, Ahmed
De Alba, Luis
Arevalo, Octavio
Ahuja, Chaitanya
Cuellar, Hugo H.
The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title_full The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title_fullStr The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title_full_unstemmed The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title_short The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
title_sort reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
topic Interventional Radiology - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052
work_keys_str_mv AT aslanassala thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT stevenschristopher thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT aldineamrosaad thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT mamillyahmed thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT dealbaluis thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT arevalooctavio thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT ahujachaitanya thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT cuellarhugoh thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT aslanassala reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT stevenschristopher reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT aldineamrosaad reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT mamillyahmed reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT dealbaluis reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT arevalooctavio reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT ahujachaitanya reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem
AT cuellarhugoh reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem