Cargando…
The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system
PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052 |
_version_ | 1785150613854617600 |
---|---|
author | Aslan, Assala Stevens, Christopher Aldine, Amro Saad Mamilly, Ahmed De Alba, Luis Arevalo, Octavio Ahuja, Chaitanya Cuellar, Hugo H. |
author_facet | Aslan, Assala Stevens, Christopher Aldine, Amro Saad Mamilly, Ahmed De Alba, Luis Arevalo, Octavio Ahuja, Chaitanya Cuellar, Hugo H. |
author_sort | Aslan, Assala |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1–68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1–3. CONCLUSION: The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10679611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106796112023-12-05 The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system Aslan, Assala Stevens, Christopher Aldine, Amro Saad Mamilly, Ahmed De Alba, Luis Arevalo, Octavio Ahuja, Chaitanya Cuellar, Hugo H. Diagn Interv Radiol Interventional Radiology - Original Article PURPOSE: The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS: Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1–68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1–3. CONCLUSION: The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously. Galenos Publishing 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10679611/ /pubmed/37070845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052 Text en © Copyright 2023 by Turkish Society of Radiology | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Interventional Radiology - Original Article Aslan, Assala Stevens, Christopher Aldine, Amro Saad Mamilly, Ahmed De Alba, Luis Arevalo, Octavio Ahuja, Chaitanya Cuellar, Hugo H. The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title | The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title_full | The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title_fullStr | The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title_full_unstemmed | The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title_short | The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
title_sort | reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system |
topic | Interventional Radiology - Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.222052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aslanassala thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT stevenschristopher thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT aldineamrosaad thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT mamillyahmed thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT dealbaluis thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT arevalooctavio thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT ahujachaitanya thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT cuellarhugoh thereproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT aslanassala reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT stevenschristopher reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT aldineamrosaad reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT mamillyahmed reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT dealbaluis reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT arevalooctavio reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT ahujachaitanya reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem AT cuellarhugoh reproducibilityofinterventionalradiologyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandexternalvalidationofaclassificationsystem |