Cargando…

Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review

This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kethidi, Nikhit, Barsoum, Kyrollos, Shukla, Pratik A., Kumar, Abhishek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960630
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.22908
_version_ 1785150614782607360
author Kethidi, Nikhit
Barsoum, Kyrollos
Shukla, Pratik A.
Kumar, Abhishek
author_facet Kethidi, Nikhit
Barsoum, Kyrollos
Shukla, Pratik A.
Kumar, Abhishek
author_sort Kethidi, Nikhit
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify articles published through April 2020 that reported on complex IVC filter retrieval techniques in >5 patients. Case reports, review papers, and studies that did not report on primary outcomes or variables of interest were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. Pooled success and complication rates were calculated for the overall number of complex retrieval attempts as well as for each filter type and each complex retrieval method. Sixteen fair-quality and three good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, with 758 patients (428 female) who had undergone 770 advanced retrieval attempts. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 7.1 years (range: 14.1–90), and the mean dwell time was 602.5 ± 388.6 days (range: 5–7336). Regarding filters, 92.6% (702/758) were retrievable and 7.4% (56/758) were permanent. Indications for complex retrieval included the failure of standard retrieval (89.2%; 676/758) and tilting or embedding in the caval wall (53.8%; 408/758); 92.6% (713/770) of the advanced retrieval attempts were successful. The pooled success rate was 92.0% (602/654) for retrievable filters and 96.4% (53/55) for permanent filters (P = 0.422). Only 2.8% (21/758) of patients experienced major complications, and the major complication rate was not significantly associated with filter type (P = 0.183). Advanced techniques for IVC filter retrieval appear safe for the retrieval of retrievable filters and certain permanent filters, with a low short-term major complication rate. Further studies on complex retrieval techniques used to remove permanent filters should be conducted to clarify their safety with respect to filter type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10679615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106796152023-12-05 Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review Kethidi, Nikhit Barsoum, Kyrollos Shukla, Pratik A. Kumar, Abhishek Diagn Interv Radiol Interventional Radiology - Review This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify articles published through April 2020 that reported on complex IVC filter retrieval techniques in >5 patients. Case reports, review papers, and studies that did not report on primary outcomes or variables of interest were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. Pooled success and complication rates were calculated for the overall number of complex retrieval attempts as well as for each filter type and each complex retrieval method. Sixteen fair-quality and three good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, with 758 patients (428 female) who had undergone 770 advanced retrieval attempts. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 7.1 years (range: 14.1–90), and the mean dwell time was 602.5 ± 388.6 days (range: 5–7336). Regarding filters, 92.6% (702/758) were retrievable and 7.4% (56/758) were permanent. Indications for complex retrieval included the failure of standard retrieval (89.2%; 676/758) and tilting or embedding in the caval wall (53.8%; 408/758); 92.6% (713/770) of the advanced retrieval attempts were successful. The pooled success rate was 92.0% (602/654) for retrievable filters and 96.4% (53/55) for permanent filters (P = 0.422). Only 2.8% (21/758) of patients experienced major complications, and the major complication rate was not significantly associated with filter type (P = 0.183). Advanced techniques for IVC filter retrieval appear safe for the retrieval of retrievable filters and certain permanent filters, with a low short-term major complication rate. Further studies on complex retrieval techniques used to remove permanent filters should be conducted to clarify their safety with respect to filter type. Galenos Publishing 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10679615/ /pubmed/36960630 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.22908 Text en © Copyright 2023 by Turkish Society of Radiology | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Interventional Radiology - Review
Kethidi, Nikhit
Barsoum, Kyrollos
Shukla, Pratik A.
Kumar, Abhishek
Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title_full Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title_fullStr Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title_short Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
title_sort inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review
topic Interventional Radiology - Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960630
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.22908
work_keys_str_mv AT kethidinikhit inferiorvenacavafilterretrievalsusingadvancedtechniquesasystematicreview
AT barsoumkyrollos inferiorvenacavafilterretrievalsusingadvancedtechniquesasystematicreview
AT shuklapratika inferiorvenacavafilterretrievalsusingadvancedtechniquesasystematicreview
AT kumarabhishek inferiorvenacavafilterretrievalsusingadvancedtechniquesasystematicreview