Cargando…
Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study
PURPOSE: The clinical management of high-risk lesions using image-guided biopsy is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the rates at which such lesions were upgraded to malignancy and identify possible predictive factors for upgrading high-risk lesions. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994925 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221790 |
_version_ | 1785150618753564672 |
---|---|
author | Oktay, Ayşenur Aslan, Özge Taşkın, Füsun Tunçbilek, Nermin Esen İçten, Selma Gül Balcı, Pınar Arıbal, Mustafa Erkin Çelik, Levent Örgüç, İhsan Şebnem Başaran Demirkazık, Figen Gültekin, Serap Aydın, Ayşe Murat Durmaz, Emel Kul, Sibel Binokay, Figen Çetin, Meltem Emlik, Ganime Dilek Akpınar, Meltem Gülsün Kadıoğlu Voyvoda, Sadiye Nuray Polat, Ahmet Veysel Başara Akın, Işıl Yıldız, Şeyma Poyraz, Necdet Özsoy, Arzu Öztekin, Pelin Seher Elverici, Eda Bayrak, İlkay Koray İkizceli, Türkan Dinç, Funda Sezgin, Gülten Gülşen, Gökçe Tunçbilek, Işıl Yalçın, Sabiha Rabia Çolakoğlu, Gül Ağlamış, Serpil Yılmaz, Ravza Rona, Günay Durhan, Gamze Güner, Davut Can Çelik Yabul, Fatma Günbey Karabekmez, Leman Tutar, Burçin Göktaş, Muhammet Buğdaycı, Onur Suner, Aslı Özdemir, Necmettin |
author_facet | Oktay, Ayşenur Aslan, Özge Taşkın, Füsun Tunçbilek, Nermin Esen İçten, Selma Gül Balcı, Pınar Arıbal, Mustafa Erkin Çelik, Levent Örgüç, İhsan Şebnem Başaran Demirkazık, Figen Gültekin, Serap Aydın, Ayşe Murat Durmaz, Emel Kul, Sibel Binokay, Figen Çetin, Meltem Emlik, Ganime Dilek Akpınar, Meltem Gülsün Kadıoğlu Voyvoda, Sadiye Nuray Polat, Ahmet Veysel Başara Akın, Işıl Yıldız, Şeyma Poyraz, Necdet Özsoy, Arzu Öztekin, Pelin Seher Elverici, Eda Bayrak, İlkay Koray İkizceli, Türkan Dinç, Funda Sezgin, Gülten Gülşen, Gökçe Tunçbilek, Işıl Yalçın, Sabiha Rabia Çolakoğlu, Gül Ağlamış, Serpil Yılmaz, Ravza Rona, Günay Durhan, Gamze Güner, Davut Can Çelik Yabul, Fatma Günbey Karabekmez, Leman Tutar, Burçin Göktaş, Muhammet Buğdaycı, Onur Suner, Aslı Özdemir, Necmettin |
author_sort | Oktay, Ayşenur |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The clinical management of high-risk lesions using image-guided biopsy is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the rates at which such lesions were upgraded to malignancy and identify possible predictive factors for upgrading high-risk lesions. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter analysis included 1.343 patients diagnosed with high-risk lesions using an image-guided core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). Only patients managed using an excisional biopsy or with at least one year of documented radiological follow-up were included. For each, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category, number of samples, needle thickness, and lesion size were correlated with malignancy upgrade rates in different histologic subtypes. Pearson’s chi-squared test, the Fisher–Freeman–Halton test, and Fisher’s exact test were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The overall upgrade rate was 20.6%, with the highest rates in the subtypes of intraductal papilloma (IP) with atypia (44.7%; 55/123), followed by atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (38.4%; 144/375), lobular neoplasia (LN) (12.7%; 7/55), papilloma without atypia (9.4%; 58/611), flat epithelial atypia (FEA) (8.7%; 10/114), and radial scars (RSs) (4.6%; 3/65). There was a significant relationship between the upgrade rate and BI-RADS category, number of samples, and lesion size Lesion size was the most predictive factor for an upgrade in all subtypes. CONCLUSION: ADH and atypical IP showed considerable upgrade rates to malignancy, requiring surgical excision. The LN, IP without atypia, pure FEA, and RS subtypes showed lower malignancy rates when the BI-RADS category was lower and in smaller lesions that had been adequately sampled using VAB. After being discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting, these cases could be managed with follow-up instead of excision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10679644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106796442023-12-05 Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study Oktay, Ayşenur Aslan, Özge Taşkın, Füsun Tunçbilek, Nermin Esen İçten, Selma Gül Balcı, Pınar Arıbal, Mustafa Erkin Çelik, Levent Örgüç, İhsan Şebnem Başaran Demirkazık, Figen Gültekin, Serap Aydın, Ayşe Murat Durmaz, Emel Kul, Sibel Binokay, Figen Çetin, Meltem Emlik, Ganime Dilek Akpınar, Meltem Gülsün Kadıoğlu Voyvoda, Sadiye Nuray Polat, Ahmet Veysel Başara Akın, Işıl Yıldız, Şeyma Poyraz, Necdet Özsoy, Arzu Öztekin, Pelin Seher Elverici, Eda Bayrak, İlkay Koray İkizceli, Türkan Dinç, Funda Sezgin, Gülten Gülşen, Gökçe Tunçbilek, Işıl Yalçın, Sabiha Rabia Çolakoğlu, Gül Ağlamış, Serpil Yılmaz, Ravza Rona, Günay Durhan, Gamze Güner, Davut Can Çelik Yabul, Fatma Günbey Karabekmez, Leman Tutar, Burçin Göktaş, Muhammet Buğdaycı, Onur Suner, Aslı Özdemir, Necmettin Diagn Interv Radiol Breast Imaging - Original Article PURPOSE: The clinical management of high-risk lesions using image-guided biopsy is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the rates at which such lesions were upgraded to malignancy and identify possible predictive factors for upgrading high-risk lesions. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter analysis included 1.343 patients diagnosed with high-risk lesions using an image-guided core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). Only patients managed using an excisional biopsy or with at least one year of documented radiological follow-up were included. For each, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category, number of samples, needle thickness, and lesion size were correlated with malignancy upgrade rates in different histologic subtypes. Pearson’s chi-squared test, the Fisher–Freeman–Halton test, and Fisher’s exact test were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The overall upgrade rate was 20.6%, with the highest rates in the subtypes of intraductal papilloma (IP) with atypia (44.7%; 55/123), followed by atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (38.4%; 144/375), lobular neoplasia (LN) (12.7%; 7/55), papilloma without atypia (9.4%; 58/611), flat epithelial atypia (FEA) (8.7%; 10/114), and radial scars (RSs) (4.6%; 3/65). There was a significant relationship between the upgrade rate and BI-RADS category, number of samples, and lesion size Lesion size was the most predictive factor for an upgrade in all subtypes. CONCLUSION: ADH and atypical IP showed considerable upgrade rates to malignancy, requiring surgical excision. The LN, IP without atypia, pure FEA, and RS subtypes showed lower malignancy rates when the BI-RADS category was lower and in smaller lesions that had been adequately sampled using VAB. After being discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting, these cases could be managed with follow-up instead of excision. Galenos Publishing 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10679644/ /pubmed/36994925 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221790 Text en © Copyright 2023 by Turkish Society of Radiology | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Breast Imaging - Original Article Oktay, Ayşenur Aslan, Özge Taşkın, Füsun Tunçbilek, Nermin Esen İçten, Selma Gül Balcı, Pınar Arıbal, Mustafa Erkin Çelik, Levent Örgüç, İhsan Şebnem Başaran Demirkazık, Figen Gültekin, Serap Aydın, Ayşe Murat Durmaz, Emel Kul, Sibel Binokay, Figen Çetin, Meltem Emlik, Ganime Dilek Akpınar, Meltem Gülsün Kadıoğlu Voyvoda, Sadiye Nuray Polat, Ahmet Veysel Başara Akın, Işıl Yıldız, Şeyma Poyraz, Necdet Özsoy, Arzu Öztekin, Pelin Seher Elverici, Eda Bayrak, İlkay Koray İkizceli, Türkan Dinç, Funda Sezgin, Gülten Gülşen, Gökçe Tunçbilek, Işıl Yalçın, Sabiha Rabia Çolakoğlu, Gül Ağlamış, Serpil Yılmaz, Ravza Rona, Günay Durhan, Gamze Güner, Davut Can Çelik Yabul, Fatma Günbey Karabekmez, Leman Tutar, Burçin Göktaş, Muhammet Buğdaycı, Onur Suner, Aslı Özdemir, Necmettin Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title | Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title_full | Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title_short | Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
title_sort | outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study |
topic | Breast Imaging - Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10679644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994925 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oktayaysenur outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT aslanozge outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT taskınfusun outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT tuncbileknermin outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT esenictenselmagul outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT balcıpınar outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT arıbalmustafaerkin outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT celiklevent outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT orgucihsansebnem outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT basarandemirkazıkfigen outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT gultekinserap outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT aydınaysemurat outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT durmazemel outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kulsibel outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT binokayfigen outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT cetinmeltem outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT emlikganimedilek outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT akpınarmeltemgulsun outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kadıogluvoyvodasadiyenuray outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT polatahmetveysel outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT basaraakınisıl outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yıldızseyma outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT poyraznecdet outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT ozsoyarzu outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT oztekinpelinseher outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT elvericieda outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT bayrakilkaykoray outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT ikizceliturkan outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT dincfunda outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT sezgingulten outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT gulsengokce outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT tuncbilekisıl outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yalcınsabiharabia outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT colakoglugul outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT aglamısserpil outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yılmazravza outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT ronagunay outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT durhangamze outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT gunerdavutcan outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT celikyabulfatma outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT gunbeykarabekmezleman outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT tutarburcin outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT goktasmuhammet outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT bugdaycıonur outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT suneraslı outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT ozdemirnecmettin outcomesofhighriskbreastlesionsdiagnosedusingimageguidedcoreneedlebiopsyresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudy |