Cargando…
The necessity of gait evaluation on the 7th day after tap tests for the idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients
BACKGROUND: A tap test is established as an evaluation method to indicate shunt surgery for hydrocephalus, especially idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The timing of gait assessment after the test is still controversial, while some studies reported the effectiveness of the gait evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04481-1 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: A tap test is established as an evaluation method to indicate shunt surgery for hydrocephalus, especially idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The timing of gait assessment after the test is still controversial, while some studies reported the effectiveness of the gait evaluation up to 2nd day after tap tests. Our study explored whether the gait evaluation on the 7th day after a tap test is necessary. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 129 consecutive cases with possible iNPH who performed gait assessment on all 1st, 3rd, and 7th days after tap tests between May 2020 and February 2022. We reviewed the following items of the patients: age, sex, modified Rankin scale, iNPH grading scale, Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), and neurological imaging. The number of probable iNPH patients who improved their gait each day after the test was analyzed. We also assessed the number of definite iNPH patients and revealed the background characteristics of the patients who showed gait improvement on the 7th day after the tests. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 57 were judged as probable iNPH on the 1st day, 28 were new on the 3rd, and 23 were new on the 7th. The number of probable iNPH patients up to the 7th day after tests was significantly more extensive than that of those up to the 3rd (108 [83.7%] vs. 85 [65.9%]; 95% confidence interval [CI], p < 0.0001). The number of definite iNPH patients was also significantly more prominent when the evaluation after the tests was performed on all of the 1st, the 3rd, and the 7th days than just on the 1st (72 vs. 42; 95% CI, p = 0.00016) or both of the 1st and the 3rd (72 vs. 61; 95% CI, p = 0.00074). No statistically significant difference existed in the patients’ backgrounds except for the pre-tap test MMSE. CONCLUSION: Gait evaluation on the 7th day after tap tests, in addition to the first few days, may reduce the number of iNPH patients who miss the opportunity of getting beneficial treatment. |
---|