Cargando…

Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: A 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly redu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kagonya, Vincent A., Onyango, Onesmus O., Maina, Michuki, Gathara, David, English, Mike, Imam, Abdulazeez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00877-7
_version_ 1785150673017372672
author Kagonya, Vincent A.
Onyango, Onesmus O.
Maina, Michuki
Gathara, David
English, Mike
Imam, Abdulazeez
author_facet Kagonya, Vincent A.
Onyango, Onesmus O.
Maina, Michuki
Gathara, David
English, Mike
Imam, Abdulazeez
author_sort Kagonya, Vincent A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly reduce the risks of rationed, delayed, or missed care. However, the characterisation, role assignment, regulation, and clinical governance mechanisms for unlicensed assistive workforce remain unclear or inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to map and collate evidence of how care assistants are labelled, utilised, regulated, and managed in formal hospital settings as well as their impact on patient care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of literature from PUBMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches and eligibility screening were conducted using the Participants–Context–Concepts framework. Thematic content analysis guided the synthesis of the findings. RESULTS: 73 records from a total of 15 countries were included in the final full-text review and synthesis. A majority (78%) of these sources were from high-income countries. Many titles are used to describe care assistants, and these vary within and across countries. On ascribed roles, care assistants perform direct patient care, housekeeping, clerical and documentation, portering, patient flow management, ordering of laboratory tests, emergency response and first aid duties. Additional extended roles that require higher competency levels exist in the United States, Australia, and Canada. There is a mixture of both positive and negative sentiments on their impact on patient care or nurses’ perception and experiences. Clinical and organisational governance mechanisms vary substantially across the 15 countries. Licensure, regulatory mechanisms, and task-shifting policies are largely absent or not reported in these countries. CONCLUSIONS: The nomenclature used to describe care assistants and the tasks they perform vary substantially within countries and across healthcare systems. There is, therefore, a need to review and update the international and national classification of occupations for clarity and more meaningful nomenclature for care assistants. In addition, the association between care assistants and care outcomes or nurses’ experience remains unclear. Furthermore, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on this topic from low- and middle-income countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12960-023-00877-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10680191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106801912023-11-27 Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review Kagonya, Vincent A. Onyango, Onesmus O. Maina, Michuki Gathara, David English, Mike Imam, Abdulazeez Hum Resour Health Review BACKGROUND: A 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly reduce the risks of rationed, delayed, or missed care. However, the characterisation, role assignment, regulation, and clinical governance mechanisms for unlicensed assistive workforce remain unclear or inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to map and collate evidence of how care assistants are labelled, utilised, regulated, and managed in formal hospital settings as well as their impact on patient care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of literature from PUBMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches and eligibility screening were conducted using the Participants–Context–Concepts framework. Thematic content analysis guided the synthesis of the findings. RESULTS: 73 records from a total of 15 countries were included in the final full-text review and synthesis. A majority (78%) of these sources were from high-income countries. Many titles are used to describe care assistants, and these vary within and across countries. On ascribed roles, care assistants perform direct patient care, housekeeping, clerical and documentation, portering, patient flow management, ordering of laboratory tests, emergency response and first aid duties. Additional extended roles that require higher competency levels exist in the United States, Australia, and Canada. There is a mixture of both positive and negative sentiments on their impact on patient care or nurses’ perception and experiences. Clinical and organisational governance mechanisms vary substantially across the 15 countries. Licensure, regulatory mechanisms, and task-shifting policies are largely absent or not reported in these countries. CONCLUSIONS: The nomenclature used to describe care assistants and the tasks they perform vary substantially within countries and across healthcare systems. There is, therefore, a need to review and update the international and national classification of occupations for clarity and more meaningful nomenclature for care assistants. In addition, the association between care assistants and care outcomes or nurses’ experience remains unclear. Furthermore, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on this topic from low- and middle-income countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12960-023-00877-7. BioMed Central 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10680191/ /pubmed/38012737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00877-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kagonya, Vincent A.
Onyango, Onesmus O.
Maina, Michuki
Gathara, David
English, Mike
Imam, Abdulazeez
Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title_full Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title_fullStr Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title_short Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
title_sort characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00877-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kagonyavincenta characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview
AT onyangoonesmuso characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview
AT mainamichuki characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview
AT gatharadavid characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview
AT englishmike characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview
AT imamabdulazeez characterisingsupportandcareassistantsinformalhospitalsettingsascopingreview