Cargando…
Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches
PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: This paper aims at comparing different approaches to measure potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) with routinely collected data on prescriptions, patient age institutionalization status (ie in nursing home or in the community). A secondary objective is to measure the r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024485 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S427516 |
_version_ | 1785150712028594176 |
---|---|
author | Eggli, Yves Halfon, Patricia Zeukeng, Minette-Joëlle Kherad, Omar Schaller, Philippe Raetzo, Marc-André Klay, Michael Frédéric Favre, Benoît Marc Schaller, Dorian Marti, Joachim |
author_facet | Eggli, Yves Halfon, Patricia Zeukeng, Minette-Joëlle Kherad, Omar Schaller, Philippe Raetzo, Marc-André Klay, Michael Frédéric Favre, Benoît Marc Schaller, Dorian Marti, Joachim |
author_sort | Eggli, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: This paper aims at comparing different approaches to measure potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) with routinely collected data on prescriptions, patient age institutionalization status (ie in nursing home or in the community). A secondary objective is to measure the rate and prevalence of PIM dispensing and to identify problematic practices in Switzerland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The studied population includes about 90,000 insured over 17 years old from a Swiss health maintenance organization in 2019 and 2020. We computed and compared the number of PIM per patient for Beers criteria, Priscus list, Laroche, NORGEP and Prescrire approaches. We also created a composite indicator that accounts for the specificities of the Swiss context (adaptation to the Swiss drugs’ market, recommendations in force related to sleeping pills, anxiolytics and NSAIDs). We also stratified the analysis per physician, including initiation and cessation of PIM prescription. RESULTS: Our comparison revealed similarities between the approaches, but also that each of them had specific gaps that provides further motivation for the development of a composite approach. PIM rate was particularly high for sleeping pills, anxiolytics, NSAIDs, even when analyses were limited to chronic use. Drugs with anticholinergic effect were also frequently prescribed. Based on our composite indicator, 27% of insured over 64 years old received at least one PIM in 2020, and 8% received more than one. Our analyses also reveal that for sleeping pills and anxiolytics, half of the volume (or prevalence?) occurs in the <65 population. We observed strong variations between physicians and a significant proportion of new users among patients with PIM. CONCLUSION: Our results show that PIMs prescribing is very frequent in Switzerland and is driven mostly by a few drug categories. There is important physician variation in PIM prescribing that warrants the development of intervention targeted at high PIM-prescribers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10680376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106803762023-11-23 Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches Eggli, Yves Halfon, Patricia Zeukeng, Minette-Joëlle Kherad, Omar Schaller, Philippe Raetzo, Marc-André Klay, Michael Frédéric Favre, Benoît Marc Schaller, Dorian Marti, Joachim Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: This paper aims at comparing different approaches to measure potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) with routinely collected data on prescriptions, patient age institutionalization status (ie in nursing home or in the community). A secondary objective is to measure the rate and prevalence of PIM dispensing and to identify problematic practices in Switzerland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The studied population includes about 90,000 insured over 17 years old from a Swiss health maintenance organization in 2019 and 2020. We computed and compared the number of PIM per patient for Beers criteria, Priscus list, Laroche, NORGEP and Prescrire approaches. We also created a composite indicator that accounts for the specificities of the Swiss context (adaptation to the Swiss drugs’ market, recommendations in force related to sleeping pills, anxiolytics and NSAIDs). We also stratified the analysis per physician, including initiation and cessation of PIM prescription. RESULTS: Our comparison revealed similarities between the approaches, but also that each of them had specific gaps that provides further motivation for the development of a composite approach. PIM rate was particularly high for sleeping pills, anxiolytics, NSAIDs, even when analyses were limited to chronic use. Drugs with anticholinergic effect were also frequently prescribed. Based on our composite indicator, 27% of insured over 64 years old received at least one PIM in 2020, and 8% received more than one. Our analyses also reveal that for sleeping pills and anxiolytics, half of the volume (or prevalence?) occurs in the <65 population. We observed strong variations between physicians and a significant proportion of new users among patients with PIM. CONCLUSION: Our results show that PIMs prescribing is very frequent in Switzerland and is driven mostly by a few drug categories. There is important physician variation in PIM prescribing that warrants the development of intervention targeted at high PIM-prescribers. Dove 2023-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10680376/ /pubmed/38024485 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S427516 Text en © 2023 Eggli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Eggli, Yves Halfon, Patricia Zeukeng, Minette-Joëlle Kherad, Omar Schaller, Philippe Raetzo, Marc-André Klay, Michael Frédéric Favre, Benoît Marc Schaller, Dorian Marti, Joachim Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title | Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title_full | Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title_fullStr | Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title_short | Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dispensing in Outpatients: Comparison of Different Measurement Approaches |
title_sort | potentially inappropriate medication dispensing in outpatients: comparison of different measurement approaches |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024485 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S427516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eggliyves potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT halfonpatricia potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT zeukengminettejoelle potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT kheradomar potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT schallerphilippe potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT raetzomarcandre potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT klaymichaelfrederic potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT favrebenoitmarc potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT schallerdorian potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches AT martijoachim potentiallyinappropriatemedicationdispensinginoutpatientscomparisonofdifferentmeasurementapproaches |