Cargando…

Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile ane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubowitz, Julia, Ziegler, Alexandra I., Beare, Richard, Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian, Walker, Adam K., Gillis, Ryan D., Chang, Aeson, Chung, Ni-Chun, Martin, Olga A., Hollande, Frédéric, Riedel, Bernhard, Sloan, Erica K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38011080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905
_version_ 1785150778979123200
author Dubowitz, Julia
Ziegler, Alexandra I.
Beare, Richard
Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian
Walker, Adam K.
Gillis, Ryan D.
Chang, Aeson
Chung, Ni-Chun
Martin, Olga A.
Hollande, Frédéric
Riedel, Bernhard
Sloan, Erica K.
author_facet Dubowitz, Julia
Ziegler, Alexandra I.
Beare, Richard
Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian
Walker, Adam K.
Gillis, Ryan D.
Chang, Aeson
Chung, Ni-Chun
Martin, Olga A.
Hollande, Frédéric
Riedel, Bernhard
Sloan, Erica K.
author_sort Dubowitz, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia. Evaluating these findings in prospective clinical studies is required to inform definitive clinical guidelines but will take many years and requires biomarkers to monitor treatment effect. Therefore, we examined the effect of different anesthetic agents on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer with the overarching goal of evaluating plausible mechanisms that could be used as biomarkers of treatment response. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that volatile anesthesia accelerates breast cancer recurrence after surgical resection of the primary tumor, we used three mouse models of breast cancer. We compared volatile sevoflurane anesthesia with intravenous propofol anesthesia and used serial non-invasive bioluminescent imaging to track primary tumor recurrence and metastatic recurrence. To determine short-term perioperative effects, we evaluated the effect of anesthesia on vascular integrity and immune cell changes after surgery in animal models. RESULTS: Survival analyses found that the kinetics of cancer recurrence and impact on survival were similar regardless of the anesthetic agent used during cancer surgery. Vascular permeability, immune cell infiltration and cytokine profiles showed no statistical difference after resection with inhaled sevoflurane or intravenous propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical studies found no evidence that choice of anesthetic agent used during cancer resection surgery affected either short-term perioperative events or long-term cancer outcomes in mouse models of breast cancer. These findings raise the possibility that mouse models do not recapitulate perioperative events in cancer patients. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that future evaluation of effects of anesthesia on cancer outcomes should focus on cancer types other than breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106812492023-11-27 Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer Dubowitz, Julia Ziegler, Alexandra I. Beare, Richard Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian Walker, Adam K. Gillis, Ryan D. Chang, Aeson Chung, Ni-Chun Martin, Olga A. Hollande, Frédéric Riedel, Bernhard Sloan, Erica K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia. Evaluating these findings in prospective clinical studies is required to inform definitive clinical guidelines but will take many years and requires biomarkers to monitor treatment effect. Therefore, we examined the effect of different anesthetic agents on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer with the overarching goal of evaluating plausible mechanisms that could be used as biomarkers of treatment response. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that volatile anesthesia accelerates breast cancer recurrence after surgical resection of the primary tumor, we used three mouse models of breast cancer. We compared volatile sevoflurane anesthesia with intravenous propofol anesthesia and used serial non-invasive bioluminescent imaging to track primary tumor recurrence and metastatic recurrence. To determine short-term perioperative effects, we evaluated the effect of anesthesia on vascular integrity and immune cell changes after surgery in animal models. RESULTS: Survival analyses found that the kinetics of cancer recurrence and impact on survival were similar regardless of the anesthetic agent used during cancer surgery. Vascular permeability, immune cell infiltration and cytokine profiles showed no statistical difference after resection with inhaled sevoflurane or intravenous propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical studies found no evidence that choice of anesthetic agent used during cancer resection surgery affected either short-term perioperative events or long-term cancer outcomes in mouse models of breast cancer. These findings raise the possibility that mouse models do not recapitulate perioperative events in cancer patients. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that future evaluation of effects of anesthesia on cancer outcomes should focus on cancer types other than breast cancer. Public Library of Science 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10681249/ /pubmed/38011080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905 Text en © 2023 Dubowitz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dubowitz, Julia
Ziegler, Alexandra I.
Beare, Richard
Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian
Walker, Adam K.
Gillis, Ryan D.
Chang, Aeson
Chung, Ni-Chun
Martin, Olga A.
Hollande, Frédéric
Riedel, Bernhard
Sloan, Erica K.
Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title_full Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title_fullStr Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title_short Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
title_sort type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: no differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38011080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905
work_keys_str_mv AT dubowitzjulia typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT ziegleralexandrai typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT bearerichard typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT jostbrinkmannfabian typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT walkeradamk typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT gillisryand typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT changaeson typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT chungnichun typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT martinolgaa typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT hollandefrederic typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT riedelbernhard typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer
AT sloanericak typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer