Cargando…
Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer
BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile ane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38011080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905 |
_version_ | 1785150778979123200 |
---|---|
author | Dubowitz, Julia Ziegler, Alexandra I. Beare, Richard Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian Walker, Adam K. Gillis, Ryan D. Chang, Aeson Chung, Ni-Chun Martin, Olga A. Hollande, Frédéric Riedel, Bernhard Sloan, Erica K. |
author_facet | Dubowitz, Julia Ziegler, Alexandra I. Beare, Richard Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian Walker, Adam K. Gillis, Ryan D. Chang, Aeson Chung, Ni-Chun Martin, Olga A. Hollande, Frédéric Riedel, Bernhard Sloan, Erica K. |
author_sort | Dubowitz, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia. Evaluating these findings in prospective clinical studies is required to inform definitive clinical guidelines but will take many years and requires biomarkers to monitor treatment effect. Therefore, we examined the effect of different anesthetic agents on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer with the overarching goal of evaluating plausible mechanisms that could be used as biomarkers of treatment response. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that volatile anesthesia accelerates breast cancer recurrence after surgical resection of the primary tumor, we used three mouse models of breast cancer. We compared volatile sevoflurane anesthesia with intravenous propofol anesthesia and used serial non-invasive bioluminescent imaging to track primary tumor recurrence and metastatic recurrence. To determine short-term perioperative effects, we evaluated the effect of anesthesia on vascular integrity and immune cell changes after surgery in animal models. RESULTS: Survival analyses found that the kinetics of cancer recurrence and impact on survival were similar regardless of the anesthetic agent used during cancer surgery. Vascular permeability, immune cell infiltration and cytokine profiles showed no statistical difference after resection with inhaled sevoflurane or intravenous propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical studies found no evidence that choice of anesthetic agent used during cancer resection surgery affected either short-term perioperative events or long-term cancer outcomes in mouse models of breast cancer. These findings raise the possibility that mouse models do not recapitulate perioperative events in cancer patients. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that future evaluation of effects of anesthesia on cancer outcomes should focus on cancer types other than breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106812492023-11-27 Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer Dubowitz, Julia Ziegler, Alexandra I. Beare, Richard Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian Walker, Adam K. Gillis, Ryan D. Chang, Aeson Chung, Ni-Chun Martin, Olga A. Hollande, Frédéric Riedel, Bernhard Sloan, Erica K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for curative treatment of solid tumors. Evidence from recent retrospective clinical analyses suggests that use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during cancer resection surgery is associated with improved overall survival compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia. Evaluating these findings in prospective clinical studies is required to inform definitive clinical guidelines but will take many years and requires biomarkers to monitor treatment effect. Therefore, we examined the effect of different anesthetic agents on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer with the overarching goal of evaluating plausible mechanisms that could be used as biomarkers of treatment response. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that volatile anesthesia accelerates breast cancer recurrence after surgical resection of the primary tumor, we used three mouse models of breast cancer. We compared volatile sevoflurane anesthesia with intravenous propofol anesthesia and used serial non-invasive bioluminescent imaging to track primary tumor recurrence and metastatic recurrence. To determine short-term perioperative effects, we evaluated the effect of anesthesia on vascular integrity and immune cell changes after surgery in animal models. RESULTS: Survival analyses found that the kinetics of cancer recurrence and impact on survival were similar regardless of the anesthetic agent used during cancer surgery. Vascular permeability, immune cell infiltration and cytokine profiles showed no statistical difference after resection with inhaled sevoflurane or intravenous propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical studies found no evidence that choice of anesthetic agent used during cancer resection surgery affected either short-term perioperative events or long-term cancer outcomes in mouse models of breast cancer. These findings raise the possibility that mouse models do not recapitulate perioperative events in cancer patients. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that future evaluation of effects of anesthesia on cancer outcomes should focus on cancer types other than breast cancer. Public Library of Science 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10681249/ /pubmed/38011080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905 Text en © 2023 Dubowitz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dubowitz, Julia Ziegler, Alexandra I. Beare, Richard Jost-Brinkmann, Fabian Walker, Adam K. Gillis, Ryan D. Chang, Aeson Chung, Ni-Chun Martin, Olga A. Hollande, Frédéric Riedel, Bernhard Sloan, Erica K. Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title | Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title_full | Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title_short | Type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: No differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
title_sort | type of anesthesia for cancer resection surgery: no differential impact on cancer recurrence in mouse models of breast cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38011080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dubowitzjulia typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT ziegleralexandrai typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT bearerichard typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT jostbrinkmannfabian typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT walkeradamk typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT gillisryand typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT changaeson typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT chungnichun typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT martinolgaa typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT hollandefrederic typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT riedelbernhard typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer AT sloanericak typeofanesthesiaforcancerresectionsurgerynodifferentialimpactoncancerrecurrenceinmousemodelsofbreastcancer |