Cargando…

A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum

Between 2013 and 2018, there has been a 71% increase in the number of patients who have required wound care in the NHS and such large numbers has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems. However, there is currently no evidence as to whether medical students are equipped with the necessary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poacher, Arwel T., Bhachoo, Hari, Jones, Andrew, Weston, Jack, Powell, Katharine, Myaat, Pan, Morgan‐Jones, Rhidian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37309250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14281
_version_ 1785142521032081408
author Poacher, Arwel T.
Bhachoo, Hari
Jones, Andrew
Weston, Jack
Powell, Katharine
Myaat, Pan
Morgan‐Jones, Rhidian
author_facet Poacher, Arwel T.
Bhachoo, Hari
Jones, Andrew
Weston, Jack
Powell, Katharine
Myaat, Pan
Morgan‐Jones, Rhidian
author_sort Poacher, Arwel T.
collection PubMed
description Between 2013 and 2018, there has been a 71% increase in the number of patients who have required wound care in the NHS and such large numbers has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems. However, there is currently no evidence as to whether medical students are equipped with the necessary skills to deal with an increasing number of wound care related issues that patients present with. A total of 323 medical students across 18 UK medical schools completed an anonymous questionnaire evaluating the wound education received at their medical school, encompassing the volume, content, format and efficacy of teaching. 68.4% (221/323) of respondents had received some form of wound education during their undergraduate studies. On average students received 2.25 h of structured, preclinical teaching and only 1 h of clinical based teaching in total. All students that received wound education reported undertaking teaching on the physiology of, and factors affecting wound healing, with only 32.2% (n = 104) of students receiving clinically based wound education There was very weak correlation and no significant association in student's ability to assess wounds (R (2) = 0.190, p = 0.013), manage wounds (R (2) = 0.060, p = 0.37), and prescribe wound care products (R (2) = 0.093, p = 0.18) with their stage of training. Students strongly agreed that wound education is an important part of the undergraduate curriculum and post graduate practice, and do not feel their learning needs have been met. This is the first study to assess the provision of wound education in the United Kingdom, demonstrating a clear deficit in the provision of wound education compared to expectation of junior doctors. Wound education is largely overlooked in the medical curriculum, lacks a clinical focus and does not prepare junior doctors with the necessary clinical abilities to deal with wound related pathology. Expert opinion to direct changes to future curriculum and further evaluation of teaching methodology is required to address this deficit and ensure students have the necessary clinical skills to excel as newly graduated doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106813982023-06-13 A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum Poacher, Arwel T. Bhachoo, Hari Jones, Andrew Weston, Jack Powell, Katharine Myaat, Pan Morgan‐Jones, Rhidian Int Wound J Original Articles Between 2013 and 2018, there has been a 71% increase in the number of patients who have required wound care in the NHS and such large numbers has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems. However, there is currently no evidence as to whether medical students are equipped with the necessary skills to deal with an increasing number of wound care related issues that patients present with. A total of 323 medical students across 18 UK medical schools completed an anonymous questionnaire evaluating the wound education received at their medical school, encompassing the volume, content, format and efficacy of teaching. 68.4% (221/323) of respondents had received some form of wound education during their undergraduate studies. On average students received 2.25 h of structured, preclinical teaching and only 1 h of clinical based teaching in total. All students that received wound education reported undertaking teaching on the physiology of, and factors affecting wound healing, with only 32.2% (n = 104) of students receiving clinically based wound education There was very weak correlation and no significant association in student's ability to assess wounds (R (2) = 0.190, p = 0.013), manage wounds (R (2) = 0.060, p = 0.37), and prescribe wound care products (R (2) = 0.093, p = 0.18) with their stage of training. Students strongly agreed that wound education is an important part of the undergraduate curriculum and post graduate practice, and do not feel their learning needs have been met. This is the first study to assess the provision of wound education in the United Kingdom, demonstrating a clear deficit in the provision of wound education compared to expectation of junior doctors. Wound education is largely overlooked in the medical curriculum, lacks a clinical focus and does not prepare junior doctors with the necessary clinical abilities to deal with wound related pathology. Expert opinion to direct changes to future curriculum and further evaluation of teaching methodology is required to address this deficit and ensure students have the necessary clinical skills to excel as newly graduated doctors. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10681398/ /pubmed/37309250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14281 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Poacher, Arwel T.
Bhachoo, Hari
Jones, Andrew
Weston, Jack
Powell, Katharine
Myaat, Pan
Morgan‐Jones, Rhidian
A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title_full A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title_fullStr A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title_full_unstemmed A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title_short A cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the United Kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
title_sort cross‐sectional evaluation of the current state of wound healing education in the united kingdom's undergraduate medical curriculum
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37309250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14281
work_keys_str_mv AT poacherarwelt acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT bhachoohari acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT jonesandrew acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT westonjack acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT powellkatharine acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT myaatpan acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT morganjonesrhidian acrosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT poacherarwelt crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT bhachoohari crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT jonesandrew crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT westonjack crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT powellkatharine crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT myaatpan crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum
AT morganjonesrhidian crosssectionalevaluationofthecurrentstateofwoundhealingeducationintheunitedkingdomsundergraduatemedicalcurriculum