Cargando…
Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328 |
_version_ | 1785142524826877952 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Lu Yang, Qian Xue, Yuyu Jia, Rong Yang, Li Zhong, Lili Zou, Liqun Xie, Yao |
author_facet | Ye, Lu Yang, Qian Xue, Yuyu Jia, Rong Yang, Li Zhong, Lili Zou, Liqun Xie, Yao |
author_sort | Ye, Lu |
collection | PubMed |
description | This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gastr’ and ‘Opene’. The ROBINS‐I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in nonrandomized controlled trials. In these 11 trials, a total of 16 095 patients had received surgical treatment for stomach cancer and all 11 trials were nonrandomized, controlled trials. Abdominal abscesses were reported in 5 trials, wound infections in 8 trials, haemorrhage in 7 trials, wound dehiscence in 2 trials and total postoperative complications in 4 trials. Meta‐analyses revealed no statistically significantly different rates of postoperative abdominal abscesses among patients who had received robotic operations than in those who had received open surgical procedures (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.25, 3.36; p = 0.89). The incidence of bleeding after surgery was not significantly different from that in both groups (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.69, 2.75; p = 0.37). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.18; p = 0.24). No significant difference was found between the two groups (OR, 1. 28; 95% CI, 0.75, 2.21; p = 0.36). No significant difference was found between the two groups of patients who had received the robotic operation and those who had received the surgery after the operation (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.66; p = 0.49). Generally speaking, this meta‐analysis suggests that the use of robotics does not result in a reduction in certain postsurgical complications, including wound infections and abdominal abscesses. Thus, the use of a microinvasive robot for stomach carcinoma operation might not be better than that performed on the surgical site after the operation. This is a valuable guide for the surgeon to select the operative method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106814122023-07-26 Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis Ye, Lu Yang, Qian Xue, Yuyu Jia, Rong Yang, Li Zhong, Lili Zou, Liqun Xie, Yao Int Wound J Original Articles This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gastr’ and ‘Opene’. The ROBINS‐I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in nonrandomized controlled trials. In these 11 trials, a total of 16 095 patients had received surgical treatment for stomach cancer and all 11 trials were nonrandomized, controlled trials. Abdominal abscesses were reported in 5 trials, wound infections in 8 trials, haemorrhage in 7 trials, wound dehiscence in 2 trials and total postoperative complications in 4 trials. Meta‐analyses revealed no statistically significantly different rates of postoperative abdominal abscesses among patients who had received robotic operations than in those who had received open surgical procedures (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.25, 3.36; p = 0.89). The incidence of bleeding after surgery was not significantly different from that in both groups (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.69, 2.75; p = 0.37). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.18; p = 0.24). No significant difference was found between the two groups (OR, 1. 28; 95% CI, 0.75, 2.21; p = 0.36). No significant difference was found between the two groups of patients who had received the robotic operation and those who had received the surgery after the operation (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.66; p = 0.49). Generally speaking, this meta‐analysis suggests that the use of robotics does not result in a reduction in certain postsurgical complications, including wound infections and abdominal abscesses. Thus, the use of a microinvasive robot for stomach carcinoma operation might not be better than that performed on the surgical site after the operation. This is a valuable guide for the surgeon to select the operative method. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10681412/ /pubmed/37496310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ye, Lu Yang, Qian Xue, Yuyu Jia, Rong Yang, Li Zhong, Lili Zou, Liqun Xie, Yao Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title | Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yelu impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT yangqian impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT xueyuyu impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT jiarong impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT yangli impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zhonglili impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT zouliqun impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis AT xieyao impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis |