Cargando…

Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis

This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Lu, Yang, Qian, Xue, Yuyu, Jia, Rong, Yang, Li, Zhong, Lili, Zou, Liqun, Xie, Yao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328
_version_ 1785142524826877952
author Ye, Lu
Yang, Qian
Xue, Yuyu
Jia, Rong
Yang, Li
Zhong, Lili
Zou, Liqun
Xie, Yao
author_facet Ye, Lu
Yang, Qian
Xue, Yuyu
Jia, Rong
Yang, Li
Zhong, Lili
Zou, Liqun
Xie, Yao
author_sort Ye, Lu
collection PubMed
description This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gastr’ and ‘Opene’. The ROBINS‐I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in nonrandomized controlled trials. In these 11 trials, a total of 16 095 patients had received surgical treatment for stomach cancer and all 11 trials were nonrandomized, controlled trials. Abdominal abscesses were reported in 5 trials, wound infections in 8 trials, haemorrhage in 7 trials, wound dehiscence in 2 trials and total postoperative complications in 4 trials. Meta‐analyses revealed no statistically significantly different rates of postoperative abdominal abscesses among patients who had received robotic operations than in those who had received open surgical procedures (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.25, 3.36; p = 0.89). The incidence of bleeding after surgery was not significantly different from that in both groups (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.69, 2.75; p = 0.37). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.18; p = 0.24). No significant difference was found between the two groups (OR, 1. 28; 95% CI, 0.75, 2.21; p = 0.36). No significant difference was found between the two groups of patients who had received the robotic operation and those who had received the surgery after the operation (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.66; p = 0.49). Generally speaking, this meta‐analysis suggests that the use of robotics does not result in a reduction in certain postsurgical complications, including wound infections and abdominal abscesses. Thus, the use of a microinvasive robot for stomach carcinoma operation might not be better than that performed on the surgical site after the operation. This is a valuable guide for the surgeon to select the operative method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106814122023-07-26 Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis Ye, Lu Yang, Qian Xue, Yuyu Jia, Rong Yang, Li Zhong, Lili Zou, Liqun Xie, Yao Int Wound J Original Articles This meta‐analysis is intended to evaluate the effect of both robotic and open‐cut operations on postoperative complications of stomach carcinoma. From the earliest date until June 2023, a full and systemic search has been carried out on four main databases with keywords extracted from ‘Robot’, ‘Gastr’ and ‘Opene’. The ROBINS‐I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in nonrandomized controlled trials. In these 11 trials, a total of 16 095 patients had received surgical treatment for stomach cancer and all 11 trials were nonrandomized, controlled trials. Abdominal abscesses were reported in 5 trials, wound infections in 8 trials, haemorrhage in 7 trials, wound dehiscence in 2 trials and total postoperative complications in 4 trials. Meta‐analyses revealed no statistically significantly different rates of postoperative abdominal abscesses among patients who had received robotic operations than in those who had received open surgical procedures (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.25, 3.36; p = 0.89). The incidence of bleeding after surgery was not significantly different from that in both groups (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.69, 2.75; p = 0.37). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.18; p = 0.24). No significant difference was found between the two groups (OR, 1. 28; 95% CI, 0.75, 2.21; p = 0.36). No significant difference was found between the two groups of patients who had received the robotic operation and those who had received the surgery after the operation (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.66; p = 0.49). Generally speaking, this meta‐analysis suggests that the use of robotics does not result in a reduction in certain postsurgical complications, including wound infections and abdominal abscesses. Thus, the use of a microinvasive robot for stomach carcinoma operation might not be better than that performed on the surgical site after the operation. This is a valuable guide for the surgeon to select the operative method. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10681412/ /pubmed/37496310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ye, Lu
Yang, Qian
Xue, Yuyu
Jia, Rong
Yang, Li
Zhong, Lili
Zou, Liqun
Xie, Yao
Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_full Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_short Impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_sort impact of robotic and open surgery on patient wound complications in gastric cancer surgery: a meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14328
work_keys_str_mv AT yelu impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT yangqian impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT xueyuyu impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT jiarong impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT yangli impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhonglili impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT zouliqun impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis
AT xieyao impactofroboticandopensurgeryonpatientwoundcomplicationsingastriccancersurgeryametaanalysis