Cargando…

Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friederichs, Jan, Gerl, Benedikt, Schneidmüller, D., Hungerer, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325
_version_ 1785142527298371584
author Friederichs, Jan
Gerl, Benedikt
Schneidmüller, D.
Hungerer, Sven
author_facet Friederichs, Jan
Gerl, Benedikt
Schneidmüller, D.
Hungerer, Sven
author_sort Friederichs, Jan
collection PubMed
description Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization has not been described during the clinical course. The role of the different microbiological pathogens on the outcome and mortality is unclear. One hundred eighty patients were included with septic inflammation response syndrome on admission. Initial wound microbiology and the changes in wound microbiology were analysed during the clinical course and correlated with outcome and risk indicators. Overall mortality was 35%. Higher age, a high Charlson Comorbidity Index or ASA score and truncal infections were highly prognostic for a lethal outcome. Microbiological findings revealed significant differences in the persistence of bacteria during the course of disease. Streptococci were only detectable within the first 5 days, whereas other bacteria persisted over a longer period of time. Initial microbiological findings correlated with better prognosis when no causative agent was identified and for gram‐negative rods. Varying survival rates were observed for different Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and other bacteria. The highest odds ratio for a lethal outcome was observed for Enterococci and fungi. Microbiological colonization changes during the clinical course of NSTIs and some microbiologic pathogens are predictive for worsening the outcome and survival. Streptococcus pyogenes is only detectable in the very early phase of NSTI and after 6 days not anymore detectable. Later Enterococci and fungi showed the highest odds ratios for a lethal outcome. Enterococci bacteria and fungi have yet not been considered of clinical relevance in NSTI or even as indicator for worsening the outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106814202023-08-30 Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? Friederichs, Jan Gerl, Benedikt Schneidmüller, D. Hungerer, Sven Int Wound J Original Articles Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization has not been described during the clinical course. The role of the different microbiological pathogens on the outcome and mortality is unclear. One hundred eighty patients were included with septic inflammation response syndrome on admission. Initial wound microbiology and the changes in wound microbiology were analysed during the clinical course and correlated with outcome and risk indicators. Overall mortality was 35%. Higher age, a high Charlson Comorbidity Index or ASA score and truncal infections were highly prognostic for a lethal outcome. Microbiological findings revealed significant differences in the persistence of bacteria during the course of disease. Streptococci were only detectable within the first 5 days, whereas other bacteria persisted over a longer period of time. Initial microbiological findings correlated with better prognosis when no causative agent was identified and for gram‐negative rods. Varying survival rates were observed for different Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and other bacteria. The highest odds ratio for a lethal outcome was observed for Enterococci and fungi. Microbiological colonization changes during the clinical course of NSTIs and some microbiologic pathogens are predictive for worsening the outcome and survival. Streptococcus pyogenes is only detectable in the very early phase of NSTI and after 6 days not anymore detectable. Later Enterococci and fungi showed the highest odds ratios for a lethal outcome. Enterococci bacteria and fungi have yet not been considered of clinical relevance in NSTI or even as indicator for worsening the outcome. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10681420/ /pubmed/37646330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Friederichs, Jan
Gerl, Benedikt
Schneidmüller, D.
Hungerer, Sven
Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title_full Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title_fullStr Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title_short Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
title_sort severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325
work_keys_str_mv AT friederichsjan severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome
AT gerlbenedikt severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome
AT schneidmullerd severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome
AT hungerersven severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome