Cargando…
Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?
Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325 |
_version_ | 1785142527298371584 |
---|---|
author | Friederichs, Jan Gerl, Benedikt Schneidmüller, D. Hungerer, Sven |
author_facet | Friederichs, Jan Gerl, Benedikt Schneidmüller, D. Hungerer, Sven |
author_sort | Friederichs, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization has not been described during the clinical course. The role of the different microbiological pathogens on the outcome and mortality is unclear. One hundred eighty patients were included with septic inflammation response syndrome on admission. Initial wound microbiology and the changes in wound microbiology were analysed during the clinical course and correlated with outcome and risk indicators. Overall mortality was 35%. Higher age, a high Charlson Comorbidity Index or ASA score and truncal infections were highly prognostic for a lethal outcome. Microbiological findings revealed significant differences in the persistence of bacteria during the course of disease. Streptococci were only detectable within the first 5 days, whereas other bacteria persisted over a longer period of time. Initial microbiological findings correlated with better prognosis when no causative agent was identified and for gram‐negative rods. Varying survival rates were observed for different Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and other bacteria. The highest odds ratio for a lethal outcome was observed for Enterococci and fungi. Microbiological colonization changes during the clinical course of NSTIs and some microbiologic pathogens are predictive for worsening the outcome and survival. Streptococcus pyogenes is only detectable in the very early phase of NSTI and after 6 days not anymore detectable. Later Enterococci and fungi showed the highest odds ratios for a lethal outcome. Enterococci bacteria and fungi have yet not been considered of clinical relevance in NSTI or even as indicator for worsening the outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106814202023-08-30 Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? Friederichs, Jan Gerl, Benedikt Schneidmüller, D. Hungerer, Sven Int Wound J Original Articles Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization has not been described during the clinical course. The role of the different microbiological pathogens on the outcome and mortality is unclear. One hundred eighty patients were included with septic inflammation response syndrome on admission. Initial wound microbiology and the changes in wound microbiology were analysed during the clinical course and correlated with outcome and risk indicators. Overall mortality was 35%. Higher age, a high Charlson Comorbidity Index or ASA score and truncal infections were highly prognostic for a lethal outcome. Microbiological findings revealed significant differences in the persistence of bacteria during the course of disease. Streptococci were only detectable within the first 5 days, whereas other bacteria persisted over a longer period of time. Initial microbiological findings correlated with better prognosis when no causative agent was identified and for gram‐negative rods. Varying survival rates were observed for different Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and other bacteria. The highest odds ratio for a lethal outcome was observed for Enterococci and fungi. Microbiological colonization changes during the clinical course of NSTIs and some microbiologic pathogens are predictive for worsening the outcome and survival. Streptococcus pyogenes is only detectable in the very early phase of NSTI and after 6 days not anymore detectable. Later Enterococci and fungi showed the highest odds ratios for a lethal outcome. Enterococci bacteria and fungi have yet not been considered of clinical relevance in NSTI or even as indicator for worsening the outcome. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10681420/ /pubmed/37646330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Friederichs, Jan Gerl, Benedikt Schneidmüller, D. Hungerer, Sven Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title | Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title_full | Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title_fullStr | Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title_short | Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
title_sort | severe necrotizing soft tissue infections—is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friederichsjan severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome AT gerlbenedikt severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome AT schneidmullerd severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome AT hungerersven severenecrotizingsofttissueinfectionsiswoundmicrobiologyaprognosticfactorforclinicaloutcome |