Cargando…
PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882 |
_version_ | 1785142550895525888 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Cen Liao, Kai H. Li, Meng Wang, I‐Ming Shaik, Naveed Yin, Donghua |
author_facet | Guo, Cen Liao, Kai H. Li, Meng Wang, I‐Ming Shaik, Naveed Yin, Donghua |
author_sort | Guo, Cen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selecting the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for the first‐in‐patient (FIP) study of PF‐06939999, a small‐molecule inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5. In the dose escalation part of the FIP trial (NCT03854227), 28 patients with solid tumors were administered PF‐06939999 at 0.5 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg once daily (q.d.) or 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Tolerability, safety, PK, PD biomarkers (plasma symmetrical dimethyl‐arginine [SDMA]), and antitumor response were assessed. Semimechanistic population PK/PD modeling analyses were performed to characterize the time‐courses of plasma PF‐06939999 concentrations, plasma SDMA, and platelet counts collected from 28 patients. Platelet counts were evaluated because thrombocytopenia was the treatment‐related adverse event with clinical safety concern. The models adequately described the PK, SDMA, and platelet count profiles both at individual and population levels. Simulations suggested that among a range of dose levels, 6 mg q.d. would yield the optimal balance between achieving the PD target (i.e., 78% reduction in plasma SDMA) and staying below an acceptable probability of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. As a result, 6 mg q.d. was selected as the RDE. The model‐informed drug development approach informed the rational dose selection for the early clinical development of PF‐06939999. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106815082022-11-16 PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor Guo, Cen Liao, Kai H. Li, Meng Wang, I‐Ming Shaik, Naveed Yin, Donghua CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selecting the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for the first‐in‐patient (FIP) study of PF‐06939999, a small‐molecule inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5. In the dose escalation part of the FIP trial (NCT03854227), 28 patients with solid tumors were administered PF‐06939999 at 0.5 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg once daily (q.d.) or 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Tolerability, safety, PK, PD biomarkers (plasma symmetrical dimethyl‐arginine [SDMA]), and antitumor response were assessed. Semimechanistic population PK/PD modeling analyses were performed to characterize the time‐courses of plasma PF‐06939999 concentrations, plasma SDMA, and platelet counts collected from 28 patients. Platelet counts were evaluated because thrombocytopenia was the treatment‐related adverse event with clinical safety concern. The models adequately described the PK, SDMA, and platelet count profiles both at individual and population levels. Simulations suggested that among a range of dose levels, 6 mg q.d. would yield the optimal balance between achieving the PD target (i.e., 78% reduction in plasma SDMA) and staying below an acceptable probability of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. As a result, 6 mg q.d. was selected as the RDE. The model‐informed drug development approach informed the rational dose selection for the early clinical development of PF‐06939999. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10681508/ /pubmed/36394153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882 Text en © 2022 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Guo, Cen Liao, Kai H. Li, Meng Wang, I‐Ming Shaik, Naveed Yin, Donghua PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title | PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title_full | PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title_fullStr | PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title_full_unstemmed | PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title_short | PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor |
title_sort | pk/pd model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase i expansion: case study based on pf‐06939999, a prmt5 inhibitor |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guocen pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor AT liaokaih pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor AT limeng pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor AT wangiming pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor AT shaiknaveed pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor AT yindonghua pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor |