Cargando…

PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor

The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Cen, Liao, Kai H., Li, Meng, Wang, I‐Ming, Shaik, Naveed, Yin, Donghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882
_version_ 1785142550895525888
author Guo, Cen
Liao, Kai H.
Li, Meng
Wang, I‐Ming
Shaik, Naveed
Yin, Donghua
author_facet Guo, Cen
Liao, Kai H.
Li, Meng
Wang, I‐Ming
Shaik, Naveed
Yin, Donghua
author_sort Guo, Cen
collection PubMed
description The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selecting the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for the first‐in‐patient (FIP) study of PF‐06939999, a small‐molecule inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5. In the dose escalation part of the FIP trial (NCT03854227), 28 patients with solid tumors were administered PF‐06939999 at 0.5 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg once daily (q.d.) or 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Tolerability, safety, PK, PD biomarkers (plasma symmetrical dimethyl‐arginine [SDMA]), and antitumor response were assessed. Semimechanistic population PK/PD modeling analyses were performed to characterize the time‐courses of plasma PF‐06939999 concentrations, plasma SDMA, and platelet counts collected from 28 patients. Platelet counts were evaluated because thrombocytopenia was the treatment‐related adverse event with clinical safety concern. The models adequately described the PK, SDMA, and platelet count profiles both at individual and population levels. Simulations suggested that among a range of dose levels, 6 mg q.d. would yield the optimal balance between achieving the PD target (i.e., 78% reduction in plasma SDMA) and staying below an acceptable probability of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. As a result, 6 mg q.d. was selected as the RDE. The model‐informed drug development approach informed the rational dose selection for the early clinical development of PF‐06939999.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106815082022-11-16 PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor Guo, Cen Liao, Kai H. Li, Meng Wang, I‐Ming Shaik, Naveed Yin, Donghua CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selecting the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for the first‐in‐patient (FIP) study of PF‐06939999, a small‐molecule inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5. In the dose escalation part of the FIP trial (NCT03854227), 28 patients with solid tumors were administered PF‐06939999 at 0.5 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg once daily (q.d.) or 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Tolerability, safety, PK, PD biomarkers (plasma symmetrical dimethyl‐arginine [SDMA]), and antitumor response were assessed. Semimechanistic population PK/PD modeling analyses were performed to characterize the time‐courses of plasma PF‐06939999 concentrations, plasma SDMA, and platelet counts collected from 28 patients. Platelet counts were evaluated because thrombocytopenia was the treatment‐related adverse event with clinical safety concern. The models adequately described the PK, SDMA, and platelet count profiles both at individual and population levels. Simulations suggested that among a range of dose levels, 6 mg q.d. would yield the optimal balance between achieving the PD target (i.e., 78% reduction in plasma SDMA) and staying below an acceptable probability of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. As a result, 6 mg q.d. was selected as the RDE. The model‐informed drug development approach informed the rational dose selection for the early clinical development of PF‐06939999. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10681508/ /pubmed/36394153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882 Text en © 2022 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Guo, Cen
Liao, Kai H.
Li, Meng
Wang, I‐Ming
Shaik, Naveed
Yin, Donghua
PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title_full PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title_fullStr PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title_full_unstemmed PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title_short PK/PD model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF‐06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor
title_sort pk/pd model‐informed dose selection for oncology phase i expansion: case study based on pf‐06939999, a prmt5 inhibitor
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12882
work_keys_str_mv AT guocen pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor
AT liaokaih pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor
AT limeng pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor
AT wangiming pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor
AT shaiknaveed pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor
AT yindonghua pkpdmodelinformeddoseselectionforoncologyphaseiexpansioncasestudybasedonpf06939999aprmt5inhibitor