Severe Left Ventricular Failure Unmanageable by Impella 5.0

Mechanical circulatory support can be beneficial for patients with cardiogenic shock. Of these, the Impella has recently become the first-line device due to its feasibility, minimal invasiveness, and efficacy. We had a 58-year-old male with acute myocardial infarction followed by cardiogenic shock. We initially placed the patient on intra-aortic balloon pumping, which was switched to Impella 2.5 and could stabilize him. Unfortunately, the Impella 2.5 device suddenly stopped on the fifth day, thus, we tried to manage him by inotropes. However, his condition gradually deteriorated, so we applied Impella 5.0. Although his systemic circulation could be maintained, severe pulmonary hypertension persisted on Impella 5.0. He developed flash pulmonary edema, thus, we emergently added venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on Impella 5.0 (ECPELLA). Then, we removed Impella 5.0 and changed peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to central venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this central venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, we inserted the cannulas in the pulmonary artery and the left ventricle in addition to the usual cannulas in the ascending aorta and the right atrium. We aimed to control pulmonary arterial blood flow for lung protection as well as left ventricular unloading by this modification. However, his cardiac function showed no signs of recovery, and his lung condition showed further exacerbation. He was complicated by fungal sepsis and finally died of multi-organ failure. Although the Impella is an option, it is crucial to evaluate patients’ condition carefully and to escalate the device, if needed, without delay.