Cargando…
Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder
Current behavioural treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is informed by fear conditioning and involves iteratively re‐evaluating previously threatening stimuli as safe. However, there is limited research investigating the neurobiological response to conditioning and reversal of threateni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26518 |
_version_ | 1785142588132556800 |
---|---|
author | Hearne, Luke J. Breakspear, Michael Harrison, Ben J. Hall, Caitlin V. Savage, Hannah S. Robinson, Conor Sonkusare, Saurabh Savage, Emma Nott, Zoie Marcus, Leo Naze, Sebastien Burgher, Bjorn Zalesky, Andrew Cocchi, Luca |
author_facet | Hearne, Luke J. Breakspear, Michael Harrison, Ben J. Hall, Caitlin V. Savage, Hannah S. Robinson, Conor Sonkusare, Saurabh Savage, Emma Nott, Zoie Marcus, Leo Naze, Sebastien Burgher, Bjorn Zalesky, Andrew Cocchi, Luca |
author_sort | Hearne, Luke J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current behavioural treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is informed by fear conditioning and involves iteratively re‐evaluating previously threatening stimuli as safe. However, there is limited research investigating the neurobiological response to conditioning and reversal of threatening stimuli in individuals with OCD. A clinical sample of individuals with OCD (N = 45) and matched healthy controls (N = 45) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. While in the scanner, participants completed a well‐validated fear reversal task and a resting‐state scan. We found no evidence for group differences in task‐evoked brain activation or functional connectivity in OCD. Multivariate analyses encompassing all participants in the clinical and control groups suggested that subjective appraisal of threatening and safe stimuli were associated with a larger difference in brain activity than the contribution of OCD symptoms. In particular, we observed a brain‐behaviour continuum whereby heightened affective appraisal was related to increased bilateral insula activation during the task (r = 0.39, p (FWE) = .001). These findings suggest that changes in conditioned threat‐related processes may not be a core neurobiological feature of OCD and encourage further research on the role of subjective experience in fear conditioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106816372023-10-18 Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder Hearne, Luke J. Breakspear, Michael Harrison, Ben J. Hall, Caitlin V. Savage, Hannah S. Robinson, Conor Sonkusare, Saurabh Savage, Emma Nott, Zoie Marcus, Leo Naze, Sebastien Burgher, Bjorn Zalesky, Andrew Cocchi, Luca Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Current behavioural treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is informed by fear conditioning and involves iteratively re‐evaluating previously threatening stimuli as safe. However, there is limited research investigating the neurobiological response to conditioning and reversal of threatening stimuli in individuals with OCD. A clinical sample of individuals with OCD (N = 45) and matched healthy controls (N = 45) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. While in the scanner, participants completed a well‐validated fear reversal task and a resting‐state scan. We found no evidence for group differences in task‐evoked brain activation or functional connectivity in OCD. Multivariate analyses encompassing all participants in the clinical and control groups suggested that subjective appraisal of threatening and safe stimuli were associated with a larger difference in brain activity than the contribution of OCD symptoms. In particular, we observed a brain‐behaviour continuum whereby heightened affective appraisal was related to increased bilateral insula activation during the task (r = 0.39, p (FWE) = .001). These findings suggest that changes in conditioned threat‐related processes may not be a core neurobiological feature of OCD and encourage further research on the role of subjective experience in fear conditioning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10681637/ /pubmed/37853935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26518 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hearne, Luke J. Breakspear, Michael Harrison, Ben J. Hall, Caitlin V. Savage, Hannah S. Robinson, Conor Sonkusare, Saurabh Savage, Emma Nott, Zoie Marcus, Leo Naze, Sebastien Burgher, Bjorn Zalesky, Andrew Cocchi, Luca Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title | Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title_full | Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title_fullStr | Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title_short | Revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
title_sort | revisiting deficits in threat and safety appraisal in obsessive‐compulsive disorder |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hearnelukej revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT breakspearmichael revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT harrisonbenj revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT hallcaitlinv revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT savagehannahs revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT robinsonconor revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT sonkusaresaurabh revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT savageemma revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT nottzoie revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT marcusleo revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT nazesebastien revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT burgherbjorn revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT zaleskyandrew revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT cocchiluca revisitingdeficitsinthreatandsafetyappraisalinobsessivecompulsivedisorder |