Cargando…
Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine
PURPOSE: Renal artery embolization is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for renal ablation, a complete necrosis of the renal parenchyma. This study aims to compare the extent of renal damage in swine following renal artery embolization with ethanol and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, commonly us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020457 http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0031 |
_version_ | 1785142614406725632 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Ryota Sonomura, Tetsuo Koike, Masataka Sato, Hirotatsu Shimono, Ryuki Kumamoto, Akihiko Fukuda, Kodai Higashino, Nobuyuki Ikoma, Akira Murata, Shin-ichi Minamiguchi, Hiroki |
author_facet | Tanaka, Ryota Sonomura, Tetsuo Koike, Masataka Sato, Hirotatsu Shimono, Ryuki Kumamoto, Akihiko Fukuda, Kodai Higashino, Nobuyuki Ikoma, Akira Murata, Shin-ichi Minamiguchi, Hiroki |
author_sort | Tanaka, Ryota |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Renal artery embolization is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for renal ablation, a complete necrosis of the renal parenchyma. This study aims to compare the extent of renal damage in swine following renal artery embolization with ethanol and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, commonly used as embolic materials in renal ablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different embolic mixtures were prepared for renal artery embolization in swine: 33% ethanol-Lipiodol mixture (ethanol:Lipiodol = 1:2; Group A), 67% ethanol-Lipiodol mixture (ethanol:Lipiodol = 2:1; Group B), and 10% N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate:Lipiodol = 1:9; Group C). Three swine were assigned to each group and underwent embolization of the unilateral renal artery. Renal arteriography was performed before, immediately after, and two days after renal artery embolization. After two days, the kidneys were removed to determine the macroscopic necrosis rate and for histologic examination. Dark tissue regions were considered necrotic. RESULTS: The macroscopic necrosis rate of the kidneys was 50.3%±7.4%, 100%±0%, and 100%±0% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The necrosis rates were higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. Histologically, the renal tubules were damaged in the necrotic areas. In addition, the glomeruli were damaged in Groups A and B but were preserved in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-seven percent ethanol-Lipiodol mixture and 10% N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture are effective embolic materials in renal artery embolization for renal ablation in swine. Also, ethanol caused partial glomerular necrosis, whereas N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate preserved the glomeruli. Therefore, ethanol should be used for renal ablation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10681758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106817582023-09-21 Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine Tanaka, Ryota Sonomura, Tetsuo Koike, Masataka Sato, Hirotatsu Shimono, Ryuki Kumamoto, Akihiko Fukuda, Kodai Higashino, Nobuyuki Ikoma, Akira Murata, Shin-ichi Minamiguchi, Hiroki Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama) Original Research PURPOSE: Renal artery embolization is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for renal ablation, a complete necrosis of the renal parenchyma. This study aims to compare the extent of renal damage in swine following renal artery embolization with ethanol and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, commonly used as embolic materials in renal ablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different embolic mixtures were prepared for renal artery embolization in swine: 33% ethanol-Lipiodol mixture (ethanol:Lipiodol = 1:2; Group A), 67% ethanol-Lipiodol mixture (ethanol:Lipiodol = 2:1; Group B), and 10% N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate:Lipiodol = 1:9; Group C). Three swine were assigned to each group and underwent embolization of the unilateral renal artery. Renal arteriography was performed before, immediately after, and two days after renal artery embolization. After two days, the kidneys were removed to determine the macroscopic necrosis rate and for histologic examination. Dark tissue regions were considered necrotic. RESULTS: The macroscopic necrosis rate of the kidneys was 50.3%±7.4%, 100%±0%, and 100%±0% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The necrosis rates were higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. Histologically, the renal tubules were damaged in the necrotic areas. In addition, the glomeruli were damaged in Groups A and B but were preserved in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-seven percent ethanol-Lipiodol mixture and 10% N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture are effective embolic materials in renal artery embolization for renal ablation in swine. Also, ethanol caused partial glomerular necrosis, whereas N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate preserved the glomeruli. Therefore, ethanol should be used for renal ablation. The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10681758/ /pubmed/38020457 http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0031 Text en © 2023 Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Interventional Radiology is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tanaka, Ryota Sonomura, Tetsuo Koike, Masataka Sato, Hirotatsu Shimono, Ryuki Kumamoto, Akihiko Fukuda, Kodai Higashino, Nobuyuki Ikoma, Akira Murata, Shin-ichi Minamiguchi, Hiroki Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title | Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title_full | Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title_short | Comparison of Renal Damage Following Renal Artery Embolization with Three Different Embolic Mixtures in Swine |
title_sort | comparison of renal damage following renal artery embolization with three different embolic mixtures in swine |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020457 http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakaryota comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT sonomuratetsuo comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT koikemasataka comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT satohirotatsu comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT shimonoryuki comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT kumamotoakihiko comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT fukudakodai comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT higashinonobuyuki comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT ikomaakira comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT muratashinichi comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine AT minamiguchihiroki comparisonofrenaldamagefollowingrenalarteryembolizationwiththreedifferentembolicmixturesinswine |