Cargando…

Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) viability scan is used to determine whether patients with a myocardial scar on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) may need revascularization. However, the clinical utility of revascularization decision-making guided by PET viability imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jong Sung, Lee, Jang Hoon, Hong, Chae Moon, Park, Bo Eun, Park, Yoon Jung, Kim, Hong Nyun, Kim, Namkyun, Jang, Se Yong, Bae, Myung Hwan, Yang, Dong Heon, Park, Hun Sik, Cho, Yongkeun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e399
_version_ 1785150844670312448
author Park, Jong Sung
Lee, Jang Hoon
Hong, Chae Moon
Park, Bo Eun
Park, Yoon Jung
Kim, Hong Nyun
Kim, Namkyun
Jang, Se Yong
Bae, Myung Hwan
Yang, Dong Heon
Park, Hun Sik
Cho, Yongkeun
author_facet Park, Jong Sung
Lee, Jang Hoon
Hong, Chae Moon
Park, Bo Eun
Park, Yoon Jung
Kim, Hong Nyun
Kim, Namkyun
Jang, Se Yong
Bae, Myung Hwan
Yang, Dong Heon
Park, Hun Sik
Cho, Yongkeun
author_sort Park, Jong Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) viability scan is used to determine whether patients with a myocardial scar on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) may need revascularization. However, the clinical utility of revascularization decision-making guided by PET viability imaging has not been proven yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of PET to determine revascularization on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Between September 2012 and May 2021, 53 patients (37 males; mean age = 64 ± 11 years) with a myocardial scar on MIBI SPECT who underwent PET viability test were analyzed in this study. The primary outcome was a temporal change in echocardiographic findings. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Viable myocardium was presented by PET imaging in 29 (54.7%) patients. Revascularization was performed in 26 (49.1%) patients, including 18 (34.0%) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 8 (15.1%) with coronary artery bypass grafting. There were significant improvements in echocardiographic findings in the revascularization group and the viable myocardium group. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the revascularization group than in the medical therapy-alone group (19.2% vs. 44.4%, log-rank P = 0.002) irrespective of viable (21.4% vs. 46.7%, log-rank P = 0.025) or non-viable myocardium (16.7% vs. 41.7%, log-rank P = 0.046). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the medical therapy-alone group (11.1% vs. 44.4%, log-rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Revascularization improved left ventricular systolic function and survival of patients with a myocardial scar on SPECT scans, irrespective of myocardial viability on PET scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10681844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106818442023-11-27 Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans Park, Jong Sung Lee, Jang Hoon Hong, Chae Moon Park, Bo Eun Park, Yoon Jung Kim, Hong Nyun Kim, Namkyun Jang, Se Yong Bae, Myung Hwan Yang, Dong Heon Park, Hun Sik Cho, Yongkeun J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) viability scan is used to determine whether patients with a myocardial scar on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) may need revascularization. However, the clinical utility of revascularization decision-making guided by PET viability imaging has not been proven yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of PET to determine revascularization on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Between September 2012 and May 2021, 53 patients (37 males; mean age = 64 ± 11 years) with a myocardial scar on MIBI SPECT who underwent PET viability test were analyzed in this study. The primary outcome was a temporal change in echocardiographic findings. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Viable myocardium was presented by PET imaging in 29 (54.7%) patients. Revascularization was performed in 26 (49.1%) patients, including 18 (34.0%) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 8 (15.1%) with coronary artery bypass grafting. There were significant improvements in echocardiographic findings in the revascularization group and the viable myocardium group. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the revascularization group than in the medical therapy-alone group (19.2% vs. 44.4%, log-rank P = 0.002) irrespective of viable (21.4% vs. 46.7%, log-rank P = 0.025) or non-viable myocardium (16.7% vs. 41.7%, log-rank P = 0.046). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the medical therapy-alone group (11.1% vs. 44.4%, log-rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Revascularization improved left ventricular systolic function and survival of patients with a myocardial scar on SPECT scans, irrespective of myocardial viability on PET scans. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10681844/ /pubmed/38013651 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e399 Text en © 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jong Sung
Lee, Jang Hoon
Hong, Chae Moon
Park, Bo Eun
Park, Yoon Jung
Kim, Hong Nyun
Kim, Namkyun
Jang, Se Yong
Bae, Myung Hwan
Yang, Dong Heon
Park, Hun Sik
Cho, Yongkeun
Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title_full Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title_fullStr Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title_short Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans
title_sort impact of positron emission tomography viability imaging: guided revascularizations on clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial scar on single-photon emission computed tomography scans
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e399
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjongsung impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT leejanghoon impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT hongchaemoon impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT parkboeun impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT parkyoonjung impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT kimhongnyun impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT kimnamkyun impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT jangseyong impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT baemyunghwan impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT yangdongheon impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT parkhunsik impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans
AT choyongkeun impactofpositronemissiontomographyviabilityimagingguidedrevascularizationsonclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithmyocardialscaronsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyscans