Cargando…

Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The most common complications to midurethral sling (MUS) operations for stress urinary incontinence are postoperative urinary retention (POUR), vaginal MUS exposure, and urgency. They are well described but consensus regarding their management is missing. An evaluation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juhl, Caroline, Thimm, Mette Holberg, Glavind, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05600-7
_version_ 1785150892509495296
author Juhl, Caroline
Thimm, Mette Holberg
Glavind, Karin
author_facet Juhl, Caroline
Thimm, Mette Holberg
Glavind, Karin
author_sort Juhl, Caroline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The most common complications to midurethral sling (MUS) operations for stress urinary incontinence are postoperative urinary retention (POUR), vaginal MUS exposure, and urgency. They are well described but consensus regarding their management is missing. An evaluation of the treatment of POUR, exposure and urgency after the MUS procedure in our department was implemented. Incontinence status after treatment of complications was evaluated. METHODS: A review of the medical records of women undergoing MUS procedures from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 329). RESULTS: A total of 279 women (85%) had no complications. Fifty women had one or more complications. Twenty-three women (7%) experienced POUR. Final treatment in 9 women was clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). All remained continent. Nine women had the MUS mobilized. This was successful in 8 women who remained continent. Six women had their MUS incised (one after unsuccessful mobilization). Four became incontinent again and 2 remained continent. Eight women had vaginal MUS exposure. Seven attempted recovering of the MUS. This was successful in 3 patients. The remaining had a partial MUS removal. Only 33% remained continent after removal. Ten patients developed de novo urge, but only 2 needed medication. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization of the MUS must be considered the optimal treatment for POUR when CISC fails. It is the most effective intervention with the best effect on POUR and the lowest risk of incontinence. Concerning vaginal exposure, a trial of recovering should be attempted as the risk of incontinence when undergoing a partial removal of the MUS is considerable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106820452023-11-30 Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling Juhl, Caroline Thimm, Mette Holberg Glavind, Karin Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The most common complications to midurethral sling (MUS) operations for stress urinary incontinence are postoperative urinary retention (POUR), vaginal MUS exposure, and urgency. They are well described but consensus regarding their management is missing. An evaluation of the treatment of POUR, exposure and urgency after the MUS procedure in our department was implemented. Incontinence status after treatment of complications was evaluated. METHODS: A review of the medical records of women undergoing MUS procedures from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 329). RESULTS: A total of 279 women (85%) had no complications. Fifty women had one or more complications. Twenty-three women (7%) experienced POUR. Final treatment in 9 women was clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). All remained continent. Nine women had the MUS mobilized. This was successful in 8 women who remained continent. Six women had their MUS incised (one after unsuccessful mobilization). Four became incontinent again and 2 remained continent. Eight women had vaginal MUS exposure. Seven attempted recovering of the MUS. This was successful in 3 patients. The remaining had a partial MUS removal. Only 33% remained continent after removal. Ten patients developed de novo urge, but only 2 needed medication. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization of the MUS must be considered the optimal treatment for POUR when CISC fails. It is the most effective intervention with the best effect on POUR and the lowest risk of incontinence. Concerning vaginal exposure, a trial of recovering should be attempted as the risk of incontinence when undergoing a partial removal of the MUS is considerable. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10682045/ /pubmed/37470797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05600-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Juhl, Caroline
Thimm, Mette Holberg
Glavind, Karin
Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title_full Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title_fullStr Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title_full_unstemmed Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title_short Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
title_sort impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05600-7
work_keys_str_mv AT juhlcaroline impactonurinaryincontinenceaftermanagementofcomplicationsrelatedtoaretropubicmidurethralsling
AT thimmmetteholberg impactonurinaryincontinenceaftermanagementofcomplicationsrelatedtoaretropubicmidurethralsling
AT glavindkarin impactonurinaryincontinenceaftermanagementofcomplicationsrelatedtoaretropubicmidurethralsling