Cargando…
A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603 |
_version_ | 1785150901713895424 |
---|---|
author | He, Tao Chen, Kun Chen, Ru-Dong |
author_facet | He, Tao Chen, Kun Chen, Ru-Dong |
author_sort | He, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based on digital subtraction angiography follow-up. Clinical characteristics, operation-related factors, and morphologies were measured. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify the risk factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to score points, and a predictive model was established. The test cohorts consisted of 51 IAs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the cutoff values and area under the curves (AUCs). A Delong test was performed to compare the AUCs. RESULTS: Diameter maximum (D max) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.221), Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) II or III (p = 0.004, HR = 2.852), and ruptured status (p < 0.001, HR = 7.782) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of IAs. A predictive model was established: D max + 2 (*) RROC (II or III; yes = 1, no = 0) + 6 (*) ruptured status (yes = 1; no = 0). The AUC of the predictive model (0.818) was significantly higher than those of D max (0.704), RROC (II or III) (0.645), and rupture status (0.683), respectively (Delong test, p < 0.05). The cutoff values of the predictive model and D max were 9.75 points and 6.65 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The D max, RROC (II or III), and ruptured status could independently predict the recurrence of IAs after coil embolization. Our model could aid in practical evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10682084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106820842023-11-30 A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization He, Tao Chen, Kun Chen, Ru-Dong Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based on digital subtraction angiography follow-up. Clinical characteristics, operation-related factors, and morphologies were measured. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify the risk factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to score points, and a predictive model was established. The test cohorts consisted of 51 IAs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the cutoff values and area under the curves (AUCs). A Delong test was performed to compare the AUCs. RESULTS: Diameter maximum (D max) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.221), Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) II or III (p = 0.004, HR = 2.852), and ruptured status (p < 0.001, HR = 7.782) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of IAs. A predictive model was established: D max + 2 (*) RROC (II or III; yes = 1, no = 0) + 6 (*) ruptured status (yes = 1; no = 0). The AUC of the predictive model (0.818) was significantly higher than those of D max (0.704), RROC (II or III) (0.645), and rupture status (0.683), respectively (Delong test, p < 0.05). The cutoff values of the predictive model and D max were 9.75 points and 6.65 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The D max, RROC (II or III), and ruptured status could independently predict the recurrence of IAs after coil embolization. Our model could aid in practical evaluations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10682084/ /pubmed/38033770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603 Text en Copyright © 2023 He, Chen and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology He, Tao Chen, Kun Chen, Ru-Dong A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title | A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title_full | A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title_fullStr | A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title_full_unstemmed | A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title_short | A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
title_sort | predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hetao apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization AT chenkun apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization AT chenrudong apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization AT hetao predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization AT chenkun predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization AT chenrudong predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization |