Cargando…

A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Tao, Chen, Kun, Chen, Ru-Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603
_version_ 1785150901713895424
author He, Tao
Chen, Kun
Chen, Ru-Dong
author_facet He, Tao
Chen, Kun
Chen, Ru-Dong
author_sort He, Tao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based on digital subtraction angiography follow-up. Clinical characteristics, operation-related factors, and morphologies were measured. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify the risk factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to score points, and a predictive model was established. The test cohorts consisted of 51 IAs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the cutoff values and area under the curves (AUCs). A Delong test was performed to compare the AUCs. RESULTS: Diameter maximum (D max) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.221), Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) II or III (p = 0.004, HR = 2.852), and ruptured status (p < 0.001, HR = 7.782) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of IAs. A predictive model was established: D max + 2 (*) RROC (II or III; yes = 1, no = 0) + 6 (*) ruptured status (yes = 1; no = 0). The AUC of the predictive model (0.818) was significantly higher than those of D max (0.704), RROC (II or III) (0.645), and rupture status (0.683), respectively (Delong test, p < 0.05). The cutoff values of the predictive model and D max were 9.75 points and 6.65 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The D max, RROC (II or III), and ruptured status could independently predict the recurrence of IAs after coil embolization. Our model could aid in practical evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106820842023-11-30 A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization He, Tao Chen, Kun Chen, Ru-Dong Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) recurrence and establish a predictive model to aid evaluation. METHODS: A total of 302 patients with 312 IAs undergoing coil embolization between September 2017 and October 2022 were divided into two groups based on digital subtraction angiography follow-up. Clinical characteristics, operation-related factors, and morphologies were measured. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify the risk factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to score points, and a predictive model was established. The test cohorts consisted of 51 IAs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the cutoff values and area under the curves (AUCs). A Delong test was performed to compare the AUCs. RESULTS: Diameter maximum (D max) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.221), Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) II or III (p = 0.004, HR = 2.852), and ruptured status (p < 0.001, HR = 7.782) were independent risk factors for the recurrence of IAs. A predictive model was established: D max + 2 (*) RROC (II or III; yes = 1, no = 0) + 6 (*) ruptured status (yes = 1; no = 0). The AUC of the predictive model (0.818) was significantly higher than those of D max (0.704), RROC (II or III) (0.645), and rupture status (0.683), respectively (Delong test, p < 0.05). The cutoff values of the predictive model and D max were 9.75 points and 6.65 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The D max, RROC (II or III), and ruptured status could independently predict the recurrence of IAs after coil embolization. Our model could aid in practical evaluations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10682084/ /pubmed/38033770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603 Text en Copyright © 2023 He, Chen and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
He, Tao
Chen, Kun
Chen, Ru-Dong
A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title_full A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title_fullStr A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title_full_unstemmed A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title_short A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
title_sort predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1248603
work_keys_str_mv AT hetao apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization
AT chenkun apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization
AT chenrudong apredictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization
AT hetao predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization
AT chenkun predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization
AT chenrudong predictivemodelfortherecurrenceofintracranialaneurysmsfollowingcoilembolization