Cargando…

Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI

BACKGROUND: Patient motion constitutes a limitation to (15)O-water cardiac PET imaging. We examined the ability of image readers to detect and correct patient motion using simulated motion data and clinical patient scans. METHODS: Simulated data consisting of 16 motions applied to 10 motion-free sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Nana L., Nordström, Jonny, Madsen, Simon, Madsen, Michael A., Gormsen, Lars C., Kero, Tanja, Lubberink, Mark, Tolbod, Lars P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5
_version_ 1785150906447167488
author Christensen, Nana L.
Nordström, Jonny
Madsen, Simon
Madsen, Michael A.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Kero, Tanja
Lubberink, Mark
Tolbod, Lars P.
author_facet Christensen, Nana L.
Nordström, Jonny
Madsen, Simon
Madsen, Michael A.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Kero, Tanja
Lubberink, Mark
Tolbod, Lars P.
author_sort Christensen, Nana L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient motion constitutes a limitation to (15)O-water cardiac PET imaging. We examined the ability of image readers to detect and correct patient motion using simulated motion data and clinical patient scans. METHODS: Simulated data consisting of 16 motions applied to 10 motion-free scans were motion corrected using two approaches, pre-analysis and post-analysis for motion identification. Both approaches employed a manual frame-by-frame correction method. In addition, a clinical cohort was analyzed for assessment of prevalence and effect of motion and motion correction. RESULTS: Motion correction was performed on 94% (pre-analysis) and 64% (post-analysis) of the scans. Large motion artifacts were corrected in 91% (pre-analysis) and 74% (post-analysis) of scans. Artifacts in MBF were reduced in 56% (pre-analysis) and 58% (post-analysis) of the scans. The prevalence of motion in the clinical patient cohort (n = 762) was 10%. Motion correction altered exam interpretation in only 10 (1.3%) clinical patient exams. CONCLUSION: Frame-by-frame motion correction after visual inspection is useful in reducing motion artifacts in cardiac (15)O-water PET. Reviewing the initial results (parametric images and polar maps) as part of the motion correction process, reduced erroneous corrections in motion-free scans. In a large clinical cohort, the impact of motion correction was limited to few patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106821052023-11-30 Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI Christensen, Nana L. Nordström, Jonny Madsen, Simon Madsen, Michael A. Gormsen, Lars C. Kero, Tanja Lubberink, Mark Tolbod, Lars P. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient motion constitutes a limitation to (15)O-water cardiac PET imaging. We examined the ability of image readers to detect and correct patient motion using simulated motion data and clinical patient scans. METHODS: Simulated data consisting of 16 motions applied to 10 motion-free scans were motion corrected using two approaches, pre-analysis and post-analysis for motion identification. Both approaches employed a manual frame-by-frame correction method. In addition, a clinical cohort was analyzed for assessment of prevalence and effect of motion and motion correction. RESULTS: Motion correction was performed on 94% (pre-analysis) and 64% (post-analysis) of the scans. Large motion artifacts were corrected in 91% (pre-analysis) and 74% (post-analysis) of scans. Artifacts in MBF were reduced in 56% (pre-analysis) and 58% (post-analysis) of the scans. The prevalence of motion in the clinical patient cohort (n = 762) was 10%. Motion correction altered exam interpretation in only 10 (1.3%) clinical patient exams. CONCLUSION: Frame-by-frame motion correction after visual inspection is useful in reducing motion artifacts in cardiac (15)O-water PET. Reviewing the initial results (parametric images and polar maps) as part of the motion correction process, reduced erroneous corrections in motion-free scans. In a large clinical cohort, the impact of motion correction was limited to few patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10682105/ /pubmed/37639181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Christensen, Nana L.
Nordström, Jonny
Madsen, Simon
Madsen, Michael A.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Kero, Tanja
Lubberink, Mark
Tolbod, Lars P.
Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title_full Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title_fullStr Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title_full_unstemmed Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title_short Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)O-water PET MPI
title_sort detection and correction of patient motion in dynamic (15)o-water pet mpi
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5
work_keys_str_mv AT christensennanal detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT nordstromjonny detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT madsensimon detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT madsenmichaela detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT gormsenlarsc detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT kerotanja detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT lubberinkmark detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi
AT tolbodlarsp detectionandcorrectionofpatientmotionindynamic15owaterpetmpi