Cargando…

Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging

BACKGROUND: Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo, Niemi, Mikael, Yeung, Ming Wai, Benjamins, Jan Walter, Maaniitty, Teemu, Teuho, Jarmo, Saraste, Antti, Knuuti, Juhani, van der Harst, Pim, Klén, Riku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37656345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET/CT data to identify patients who developed myocardial infarction (MI) or death in long-term follow up. METHODS: Data from 739 intermediate risk patients who underwent coronary CT and selectively stress (15)O-water-PET perfusion were analyzed for the occurrence of MI and all-cause mortality. Images were evaluated segmentally for atherosclerosis and absolute myocardial perfusion through 75 variables that were integrated through ML into an ML-CCTA and an ML-PET score. These scores were then modeled along with clinical variables through Cox regression. This hybridized model was compared against an expert interpretation-based and a calcium score-based model. RESULTS: Compared with expert- and calcium score-based models, the hybridized ML-survival model showed the highest performance (CI .81 vs .71 and .64). The strongest predictor for outcomes was the ML-CCTA score. CONCLUSION: Prognostic modeling of PET/CT data for the long-term occurrence of adverse events may be improved through ML imaging score integration and subsequent traditional survival analysis with clinical variables. This hybridization of methods offers an alternative to traditional survival modeling of conventional expert image scoring and interpretation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4.