Cargando…
Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging
BACKGROUND: Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37656345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4 |
_version_ | 1785150931597262848 |
---|---|
author | Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo Niemi, Mikael Yeung, Ming Wai Benjamins, Jan Walter Maaniitty, Teemu Teuho, Jarmo Saraste, Antti Knuuti, Juhani van der Harst, Pim Klén, Riku |
author_facet | Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo Niemi, Mikael Yeung, Ming Wai Benjamins, Jan Walter Maaniitty, Teemu Teuho, Jarmo Saraste, Antti Knuuti, Juhani van der Harst, Pim Klén, Riku |
author_sort | Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET/CT data to identify patients who developed myocardial infarction (MI) or death in long-term follow up. METHODS: Data from 739 intermediate risk patients who underwent coronary CT and selectively stress (15)O-water-PET perfusion were analyzed for the occurrence of MI and all-cause mortality. Images were evaluated segmentally for atherosclerosis and absolute myocardial perfusion through 75 variables that were integrated through ML into an ML-CCTA and an ML-PET score. These scores were then modeled along with clinical variables through Cox regression. This hybridized model was compared against an expert interpretation-based and a calcium score-based model. RESULTS: Compared with expert- and calcium score-based models, the hybridized ML-survival model showed the highest performance (CI .81 vs .71 and .64). The strongest predictor for outcomes was the ML-CCTA score. CONCLUSION: Prognostic modeling of PET/CT data for the long-term occurrence of adverse events may be improved through ML imaging score integration and subsequent traditional survival analysis with clinical variables. This hybridization of methods offers an alternative to traditional survival modeling of conventional expert image scoring and interpretation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10682215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106822152023-11-30 Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo Niemi, Mikael Yeung, Ming Wai Benjamins, Jan Walter Maaniitty, Teemu Teuho, Jarmo Saraste, Antti Knuuti, Juhani van der Harst, Pim Klén, Riku J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET/CT data to identify patients who developed myocardial infarction (MI) or death in long-term follow up. METHODS: Data from 739 intermediate risk patients who underwent coronary CT and selectively stress (15)O-water-PET perfusion were analyzed for the occurrence of MI and all-cause mortality. Images were evaluated segmentally for atherosclerosis and absolute myocardial perfusion through 75 variables that were integrated through ML into an ML-CCTA and an ML-PET score. These scores were then modeled along with clinical variables through Cox regression. This hybridized model was compared against an expert interpretation-based and a calcium score-based model. RESULTS: Compared with expert- and calcium score-based models, the hybridized ML-survival model showed the highest performance (CI .81 vs .71 and .64). The strongest predictor for outcomes was the ML-CCTA score. CONCLUSION: Prognostic modeling of PET/CT data for the long-term occurrence of adverse events may be improved through ML imaging score integration and subsequent traditional survival analysis with clinical variables. This hybridization of methods offers an alternative to traditional survival modeling of conventional expert image scoring and interpretation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10682215/ /pubmed/37656345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo Niemi, Mikael Yeung, Ming Wai Benjamins, Jan Walter Maaniitty, Teemu Teuho, Jarmo Saraste, Antti Knuuti, Juhani van der Harst, Pim Klén, Riku Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title | Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title_full | Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title_fullStr | Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title_short | Hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac PET/CT imaging |
title_sort | hybridizing machine learning in survival analysis of cardiac pet/ct imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37656345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juarezorozcoluiseduardo hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT niemimikael hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT yeungmingwai hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT benjaminsjanwalter hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT maaniittyteemu hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT teuhojarmo hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT sarasteantti hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT knuutijuhani hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT vanderharstpim hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging AT klenriku hybridizingmachinelearninginsurvivalanalysisofcardiacpetctimaging |