Cargando…

Sondenlose Herzschrittmacher: Eine „dauerhaft“ gute Lösung?

The two currently available leadless pacemakers are highly effective and safe in the respective approval studies and also real-world registries. Compared to conventional pacemakers, there are lower long-term complication rates compared to conventional pacemaker systems (especially regarding lead dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinwender, Clemens, Blessberger, Hermann, Saleh, Karim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37870606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00970-3
Descripción
Sumario:The two currently available leadless pacemakers are highly effective and safe in the respective approval studies and also real-world registries. Compared to conventional pacemakers, there are lower long-term complication rates compared to conventional pacemaker systems (especially regarding lead dislocations and systemic infections). Increasing evidence (currently largely for the Micra™ [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA] device) shows that these advantages are also valid in the long-term. Leadless pacemakers can therefore be regarded a “permanently good solution”, when appropriately implanted in suitable patients.