Cargando…
Sondenlose Herzschrittmacher: Eine „dauerhaft“ gute Lösung?
The two currently available leadless pacemakers are highly effective and safe in the respective approval studies and also real-world registries. Compared to conventional pacemakers, there are lower long-term complication rates compared to conventional pacemaker systems (especially regarding lead dis...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37870606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00970-3 |
Sumario: | The two currently available leadless pacemakers are highly effective and safe in the respective approval studies and also real-world registries. Compared to conventional pacemakers, there are lower long-term complication rates compared to conventional pacemaker systems (especially regarding lead dislocations and systemic infections). Increasing evidence (currently largely for the Micra™ [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA] device) shows that these advantages are also valid in the long-term. Leadless pacemakers can therefore be regarded a “permanently good solution”, when appropriately implanted in suitable patients. |
---|