Cargando…

Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Current endometriosis treatments do not always provide symptom relief, with many using complementary approaches. This study examined the effectiveness of acupuncture on pain and quality of life in people with endometriosis. METHODS: Searches were conducted on Cochrane Central Register of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giese, Nora, Kwon, Ki Kyung, Armour, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.101003
_version_ 1785151027965591552
author Giese, Nora
Kwon, Ki Kyung
Armour, Mike
author_facet Giese, Nora
Kwon, Ki Kyung
Armour, Mike
author_sort Giese, Nora
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current endometriosis treatments do not always provide symptom relief, with many using complementary approaches. This study examined the effectiveness of acupuncture on pain and quality of life in people with endometriosis. METHODS: Searches were conducted on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Embase (Ovid), Epistemonikos, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCOhost) on 20 March 2023. Trials were included if they used penetrating acupuncture. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 and GRADE for overall evidence certainty. Random-effects meta-analyses were undertaken, using Hedges’ g or mean difference (MD) both with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Six studies involving a total of 331 participants were included. Evidence for benefit was found for acupuncture compared to non-specific acupuncture on overall pelvic pain (g = 1.54, 95 % CI 0.92 to 2.16, 3 RCTs, n = 231, low certainty evidence, p<0.001), menstrual pain (g = 1.67, 95 % CI 1.23 to 2.12, 1 RCT, n = 106, moderate certainty evidence, p<0.001), and non-specified pelvic pain (MD -2.77, 95 % CI 2.15 to 3.38, 2 RCTs, n = 125, low certainty evidence, p<0.001), and compared to usual care on menstrual pain (g = 0.9, 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.64, 1 RCT, n = 19, very low certainty evidence, p = 0.02). Most studies reported low rates of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture treatment for endometriosis demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in pelvic pain and should be considered as a potential treatment intervention. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023408700.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106826772023-11-30 Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Giese, Nora Kwon, Ki Kyung Armour, Mike Integr Med Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Current endometriosis treatments do not always provide symptom relief, with many using complementary approaches. This study examined the effectiveness of acupuncture on pain and quality of life in people with endometriosis. METHODS: Searches were conducted on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Embase (Ovid), Epistemonikos, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCOhost) on 20 March 2023. Trials were included if they used penetrating acupuncture. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 and GRADE for overall evidence certainty. Random-effects meta-analyses were undertaken, using Hedges’ g or mean difference (MD) both with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Six studies involving a total of 331 participants were included. Evidence for benefit was found for acupuncture compared to non-specific acupuncture on overall pelvic pain (g = 1.54, 95 % CI 0.92 to 2.16, 3 RCTs, n = 231, low certainty evidence, p<0.001), menstrual pain (g = 1.67, 95 % CI 1.23 to 2.12, 1 RCT, n = 106, moderate certainty evidence, p<0.001), and non-specified pelvic pain (MD -2.77, 95 % CI 2.15 to 3.38, 2 RCTs, n = 125, low certainty evidence, p<0.001), and compared to usual care on menstrual pain (g = 0.9, 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.64, 1 RCT, n = 19, very low certainty evidence, p = 0.02). Most studies reported low rates of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture treatment for endometriosis demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in pelvic pain and should be considered as a potential treatment intervention. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023408700. Elsevier 2023-12 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10682677/ /pubmed/38033648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.101003 Text en © 2023 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Giese, Nora
Kwon, Ki Kyung
Armour, Mike
Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort acupuncture for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.101003
work_keys_str_mv AT giesenora acupunctureforendometriosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kwonkikyung acupunctureforendometriosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT armourmike acupunctureforendometriosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis