Cargando…

Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe. METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed. RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van de Heyning, Paul, Gavilán, Javier, Godey, Benoît, Hagen, Rudolf, Hagr, Abdulrahman, Kameswaran, Mohan, Li, Yongxin, Manoj, Manikoth, Mlynski, Robert, O’Driscoll, Martin, Pillsbury, Harold, Raine, Christopher H., Rajan, Gunesh, Schmutzhard, Joachim, Staecker, Hinrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21470
_version_ 1785151056150265856
author Van de Heyning, Paul
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoît
Hagen, Rudolf
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Kameswaran, Mohan
Li, Yongxin
Manoj, Manikoth
Mlynski, Robert
O’Driscoll, Martin
Pillsbury, Harold
Raine, Christopher H.
Rajan, Gunesh
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Staecker, Hinrich
author_facet Van de Heyning, Paul
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoît
Hagen, Rudolf
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Kameswaran, Mohan
Li, Yongxin
Manoj, Manikoth
Mlynski, Robert
O’Driscoll, Martin
Pillsbury, Harold
Raine, Christopher H.
Rajan, Gunesh
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Staecker, Hinrich
author_sort Van de Heyning, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe. METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed. RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent. CONCLUSION: : Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106828092023-11-30 Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Van de Heyning, Paul Gavilán, Javier Godey, Benoît Hagen, Rudolf Hagr, Abdulrahman Kameswaran, Mohan Li, Yongxin Manoj, Manikoth Mlynski, Robert O’Driscoll, Martin Pillsbury, Harold Raine, Christopher H. Rajan, Gunesh Schmutzhard, Joachim Staecker, Hinrich J Int Adv Otol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe. METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed. RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent. CONCLUSION: : Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2022-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10682809/ /pubmed/35608486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21470 Text en 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Van de Heyning, Paul
Gavilán, Javier
Godey, Benoît
Hagen, Rudolf
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Kameswaran, Mohan
Li, Yongxin
Manoj, Manikoth
Mlynski, Robert
O’Driscoll, Martin
Pillsbury, Harold
Raine, Christopher H.
Rajan, Gunesh
Schmutzhard, Joachim
Staecker, Hinrich
Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title_full Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title_fullStr Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title_full_unstemmed Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title_short Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
title_sort worldwide variation in cochlear implant candidacy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21470
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeheyningpaul worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT gavilanjavier worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT godeybenoit worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT hagenrudolf worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT hagrabdulrahman worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT kameswaranmohan worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT liyongxin worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT manojmanikoth worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT mlynskirobert worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT odriscollmartin worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT pillsburyharold worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT rainechristopherh worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT rajangunesh worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT schmutzhardjoachim worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy
AT staeckerhinrich worldwidevariationincochlearimplantcandidacy