Cargando…
Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serologi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37778539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825 |
_version_ | 1785151063982080000 |
---|---|
author | Mögling, Ramona Reimerink, Johan Stanoeva, Kamelia R. Keramarou, Maria Guiomar, Raquel Costa, Inês Haveri, Anu Holzer, Barbara Korukluoğlu, Gülay Nguyen, Trung Pakarna, Gatis Pancer, Katarzyna Trilar, Katarina Prosenc Protic, Jelena Stojanović, Marijana De Santis, Riccardo Lista, Florigio Vremera, Teodora Leustean, Mihaela Pistol, Adriana Zelena, Hana Reusken, Chantal Broberg, Eeva K. |
author_facet | Mögling, Ramona Reimerink, Johan Stanoeva, Kamelia R. Keramarou, Maria Guiomar, Raquel Costa, Inês Haveri, Anu Holzer, Barbara Korukluoğlu, Gülay Nguyen, Trung Pakarna, Gatis Pancer, Katarzyna Trilar, Katarina Prosenc Protic, Jelena Stojanović, Marijana De Santis, Riccardo Lista, Florigio Vremera, Teodora Leustean, Mihaela Pistol, Adriana Zelena, Hana Reusken, Chantal Broberg, Eeva K. |
author_sort | Mögling, Ramona |
collection | PubMed |
description | One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serological tests and consequently the sero-epidemiological studies that are performed with the respective tests. Here, we describe the set-up and results of a comparative study, in which a laboratory contracted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control offered a centralised service to EU/EEA Member and pre-accession Member States to test representative serum specimens with known serological results, with the gold standard technique (virus neutralisation tests) to determine the presence of neutralising antibodies. Laboratories from 12 European countries shared 719 serum specimens with the contractor laboratory. We found that in-house serological tests detecting neutralising antibodies showed the highest percent agreement, both positive and negative, with the virus neutralisation test results. Despite extensive differences in virus neutralisation protocols neutralisation titres showed a strong correlation. From the commercial assays, the best positive percent agreement was found for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) (Siemens - Atellica IM Analyzer). Despite lower positive percent agreement of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG kit (Diasorin Inc.), the obtained results showed relatively good correlation with neutralisation titres. The set-up of this study allowed for high comparability between laboratories and enabled laboratories that do not have the capacity or capability to perform VNTs themselves. Given the variety of in-house protocols detecting SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralising antibodies, including the virus strain, it could be of interest to select reference isolates for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic to be made available for interested EU Member States and pre-accession countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10682845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106828452023-12-01 Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 Mögling, Ramona Reimerink, Johan Stanoeva, Kamelia R. Keramarou, Maria Guiomar, Raquel Costa, Inês Haveri, Anu Holzer, Barbara Korukluoğlu, Gülay Nguyen, Trung Pakarna, Gatis Pancer, Katarzyna Trilar, Katarina Prosenc Protic, Jelena Stojanović, Marijana De Santis, Riccardo Lista, Florigio Vremera, Teodora Leustean, Mihaela Pistol, Adriana Zelena, Hana Reusken, Chantal Broberg, Eeva K. J Virol Methods Protocols One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serological tests and consequently the sero-epidemiological studies that are performed with the respective tests. Here, we describe the set-up and results of a comparative study, in which a laboratory contracted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control offered a centralised service to EU/EEA Member and pre-accession Member States to test representative serum specimens with known serological results, with the gold standard technique (virus neutralisation tests) to determine the presence of neutralising antibodies. Laboratories from 12 European countries shared 719 serum specimens with the contractor laboratory. We found that in-house serological tests detecting neutralising antibodies showed the highest percent agreement, both positive and negative, with the virus neutralisation test results. Despite extensive differences in virus neutralisation protocols neutralisation titres showed a strong correlation. From the commercial assays, the best positive percent agreement was found for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) (Siemens - Atellica IM Analyzer). Despite lower positive percent agreement of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG kit (Diasorin Inc.), the obtained results showed relatively good correlation with neutralisation titres. The set-up of this study allowed for high comparability between laboratories and enabled laboratories that do not have the capacity or capability to perform VNTs themselves. Given the variety of in-house protocols detecting SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralising antibodies, including the virus strain, it could be of interest to select reference isolates for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic to be made available for interested EU Member States and pre-accession countries. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10682845/ /pubmed/37778539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Protocols Mögling, Ramona Reimerink, Johan Stanoeva, Kamelia R. Keramarou, Maria Guiomar, Raquel Costa, Inês Haveri, Anu Holzer, Barbara Korukluoğlu, Gülay Nguyen, Trung Pakarna, Gatis Pancer, Katarzyna Trilar, Katarina Prosenc Protic, Jelena Stojanović, Marijana De Santis, Riccardo Lista, Florigio Vremera, Teodora Leustean, Mihaela Pistol, Adriana Zelena, Hana Reusken, Chantal Broberg, Eeva K. Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title | Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title_full | Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title_fullStr | Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title_short | Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 |
title_sort | comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-sars-cov-2 antibodies in europe, 2021 |
topic | Protocols |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37778539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moglingramona comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT reimerinkjohan comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT stanoevakameliar comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT keramaroumaria comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT guiomarraquel comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT costaines comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT haverianu comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT holzerbarbara comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT korukluoglugulay comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT nguyentrung comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT pakarnagatis comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT pancerkatarzyna comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT trilarkatarinaprosenc comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT proticjelena comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT stojanovicmarijana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT desantisriccardo comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT listaflorigio comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT vremerateodora comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT leusteanmihaela comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT pistoladriana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT zelenahana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT reuskenchantal comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 AT brobergeevak comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021 |