Cargando…

Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021

One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mögling, Ramona, Reimerink, Johan, Stanoeva, Kamelia R., Keramarou, Maria, Guiomar, Raquel, Costa, Inês, Haveri, Anu, Holzer, Barbara, Korukluoğlu, Gülay, Nguyen, Trung, Pakarna, Gatis, Pancer, Katarzyna, Trilar, Katarina Prosenc, Protic, Jelena, Stojanović, Marijana, De Santis, Riccardo, Lista, Florigio, Vremera, Teodora, Leustean, Mihaela, Pistol, Adriana, Zelena, Hana, Reusken, Chantal, Broberg, Eeva K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37778539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825
_version_ 1785151063982080000
author Mögling, Ramona
Reimerink, Johan
Stanoeva, Kamelia R.
Keramarou, Maria
Guiomar, Raquel
Costa, Inês
Haveri, Anu
Holzer, Barbara
Korukluoğlu, Gülay
Nguyen, Trung
Pakarna, Gatis
Pancer, Katarzyna
Trilar, Katarina Prosenc
Protic, Jelena
Stojanović, Marijana
De Santis, Riccardo
Lista, Florigio
Vremera, Teodora
Leustean, Mihaela
Pistol, Adriana
Zelena, Hana
Reusken, Chantal
Broberg, Eeva K.
author_facet Mögling, Ramona
Reimerink, Johan
Stanoeva, Kamelia R.
Keramarou, Maria
Guiomar, Raquel
Costa, Inês
Haveri, Anu
Holzer, Barbara
Korukluoğlu, Gülay
Nguyen, Trung
Pakarna, Gatis
Pancer, Katarzyna
Trilar, Katarina Prosenc
Protic, Jelena
Stojanović, Marijana
De Santis, Riccardo
Lista, Florigio
Vremera, Teodora
Leustean, Mihaela
Pistol, Adriana
Zelena, Hana
Reusken, Chantal
Broberg, Eeva K.
author_sort Mögling, Ramona
collection PubMed
description One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serological tests and consequently the sero-epidemiological studies that are performed with the respective tests. Here, we describe the set-up and results of a comparative study, in which a laboratory contracted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control offered a centralised service to EU/EEA Member and pre-accession Member States to test representative serum specimens with known serological results, with the gold standard technique (virus neutralisation tests) to determine the presence of neutralising antibodies. Laboratories from 12 European countries shared 719 serum specimens with the contractor laboratory. We found that in-house serological tests detecting neutralising antibodies showed the highest percent agreement, both positive and negative, with the virus neutralisation test results. Despite extensive differences in virus neutralisation protocols neutralisation titres showed a strong correlation. From the commercial assays, the best positive percent agreement was found for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) (Siemens - Atellica IM Analyzer). Despite lower positive percent agreement of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG kit (Diasorin Inc.), the obtained results showed relatively good correlation with neutralisation titres. The set-up of this study allowed for high comparability between laboratories and enabled laboratories that do not have the capacity or capability to perform VNTs themselves. Given the variety of in-house protocols detecting SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralising antibodies, including the virus strain, it could be of interest to select reference isolates for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic to be made available for interested EU Member States and pre-accession countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106828452023-12-01 Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021 Mögling, Ramona Reimerink, Johan Stanoeva, Kamelia R. Keramarou, Maria Guiomar, Raquel Costa, Inês Haveri, Anu Holzer, Barbara Korukluoğlu, Gülay Nguyen, Trung Pakarna, Gatis Pancer, Katarzyna Trilar, Katarina Prosenc Protic, Jelena Stojanović, Marijana De Santis, Riccardo Lista, Florigio Vremera, Teodora Leustean, Mihaela Pistol, Adriana Zelena, Hana Reusken, Chantal Broberg, Eeva K. J Virol Methods Protocols One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serological tests and consequently the sero-epidemiological studies that are performed with the respective tests. Here, we describe the set-up and results of a comparative study, in which a laboratory contracted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control offered a centralised service to EU/EEA Member and pre-accession Member States to test representative serum specimens with known serological results, with the gold standard technique (virus neutralisation tests) to determine the presence of neutralising antibodies. Laboratories from 12 European countries shared 719 serum specimens with the contractor laboratory. We found that in-house serological tests detecting neutralising antibodies showed the highest percent agreement, both positive and negative, with the virus neutralisation test results. Despite extensive differences in virus neutralisation protocols neutralisation titres showed a strong correlation. From the commercial assays, the best positive percent agreement was found for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) (Siemens - Atellica IM Analyzer). Despite lower positive percent agreement of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG kit (Diasorin Inc.), the obtained results showed relatively good correlation with neutralisation titres. The set-up of this study allowed for high comparability between laboratories and enabled laboratories that do not have the capacity or capability to perform VNTs themselves. Given the variety of in-house protocols detecting SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralising antibodies, including the virus strain, it could be of interest to select reference isolates for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic to be made available for interested EU Member States and pre-accession countries. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10682845/ /pubmed/37778539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Protocols
Mögling, Ramona
Reimerink, Johan
Stanoeva, Kamelia R.
Keramarou, Maria
Guiomar, Raquel
Costa, Inês
Haveri, Anu
Holzer, Barbara
Korukluoğlu, Gülay
Nguyen, Trung
Pakarna, Gatis
Pancer, Katarzyna
Trilar, Katarina Prosenc
Protic, Jelena
Stojanović, Marijana
De Santis, Riccardo
Lista, Florigio
Vremera, Teodora
Leustean, Mihaela
Pistol, Adriana
Zelena, Hana
Reusken, Chantal
Broberg, Eeva K.
Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title_full Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title_fullStr Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title_short Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021
title_sort comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-sars-cov-2 antibodies in europe, 2021
topic Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37778539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114825
work_keys_str_mv AT moglingramona comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT reimerinkjohan comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT stanoevakameliar comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT keramaroumaria comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT guiomarraquel comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT costaines comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT haverianu comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT holzerbarbara comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT korukluoglugulay comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT nguyentrung comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT pakarnagatis comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT pancerkatarzyna comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT trilarkatarinaprosenc comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT proticjelena comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT stojanovicmarijana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT desantisriccardo comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT listaflorigio comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT vremerateodora comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT leusteanmihaela comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT pistoladriana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT zelenahana comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT reuskenchantal comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021
AT brobergeevak comparativestudybetweenvirusneutralisationtestingandotherserologicalmethodsdetectingantisarscov2antibodiesineurope2021