Cargando…
Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510 |
_version_ | 1785151069797482496 |
---|---|
author | Bertaina, Maurizio Morici, Nuccia Frea, Simone Garatti, Laura Briani, Martina Sorini, Carlotta Villanova, Luca Corrada, Elena Sacco, Alice Moltrasio, Marco Ravera, Amelia Tedeschi, Michele Bertoldi, Letizia Lettino, Maddalena Saia, Francesco Corsini, Anna Camporotondo, Rita Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia Bertolin, Stephanie Rota, Matteo Oliva, Fabrizio Iannaccone, Mario Valente, Serafina Pagnesi, Matteo Metra, Marco Sionis, Alessandro Marini, Marco De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria Kapur, Navin K. Pappalardo, Federico Tavazzi, Guido |
author_facet | Bertaina, Maurizio Morici, Nuccia Frea, Simone Garatti, Laura Briani, Martina Sorini, Carlotta Villanova, Luca Corrada, Elena Sacco, Alice Moltrasio, Marco Ravera, Amelia Tedeschi, Michele Bertoldi, Letizia Lettino, Maddalena Saia, Francesco Corsini, Anna Camporotondo, Rita Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia Bertolin, Stephanie Rota, Matteo Oliva, Fabrizio Iannaccone, Mario Valente, Serafina Pagnesi, Matteo Metra, Marco Sionis, Alessandro Marini, Marco De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria Kapur, Navin K. Pappalardo, Federico Tavazzi, Guido |
author_sort | Bertaina, Maurizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI‐CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AMI‐CS or ADHF‐CS enrolled in the Altshock‐2 registry between March 2020 and February 2022 were selected. The primary objective was the characterization of ADHF‐CS patients as compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. One‐hundred‐ninety of the 238 CS patients enrolled in the aforementioned period were considered for the present analysis: 101 AMI‐CS (80% ST‐elevated myocardial infarction and 20% non‐ST‐elevated myocardial infarction) and 89 ADHF‐CS. As compared with AMI‐CS, ADHF‐CS patients were younger [63 (IQR 59–76) vs. 67 (IQR 54–73) years, P = 0.01], but presented with higher creatinine [1.6 (IQR 1.0–2.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR 1.0–1.4) mg/dL, P < 0.001], bilirubin [1.3 (IQR 0.9–2.3) vs. 0.6 (IQR 0.4–1.1) mg/dL, P = 0.01], and central venous pressure values [14 mmHg (IQR 8–12) vs. 10 mmHg (IQR 7–14),P = 0.01]. Norepinephrine was the most common catecholamine used in AMI‐CS (79.3%), whereas epinephrine was used more commonly in ADHF‐CS (65.5%); 75.8% vs. 46.6% received a temporary mechanical support in AMI‐CS and ADHF‐CS, respectively (P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was longer in the latter [28 (IQR 13–48) vs. 17 (IQR 9–29) days, P = 0.001]. Heart replacement therapies were more frequently used in the ADHF‐CS group (heart transplantation 13.5% vs. 0% and left ventricular assist device 11% vs. 2%, P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In‐hospital mortality was 41.1% (38.6% AMI‐CS vs. 43.8% ADHF‐CS, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: ADHF‐CS is characterized by a higher prevalence of end‐organ and biventricular dysfunction at presentation, a longer hospital length of stay, and higher need of heart replacement therapies when compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital mortality was similar between the two aetiologies. Our data warrant development of new management protocols focused on CS aetiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10682868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106828682023-11-30 Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction Bertaina, Maurizio Morici, Nuccia Frea, Simone Garatti, Laura Briani, Martina Sorini, Carlotta Villanova, Luca Corrada, Elena Sacco, Alice Moltrasio, Marco Ravera, Amelia Tedeschi, Michele Bertoldi, Letizia Lettino, Maddalena Saia, Francesco Corsini, Anna Camporotondo, Rita Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia Bertolin, Stephanie Rota, Matteo Oliva, Fabrizio Iannaccone, Mario Valente, Serafina Pagnesi, Matteo Metra, Marco Sionis, Alessandro Marini, Marco De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria Kapur, Navin K. Pappalardo, Federico Tavazzi, Guido ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI‐CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AMI‐CS or ADHF‐CS enrolled in the Altshock‐2 registry between March 2020 and February 2022 were selected. The primary objective was the characterization of ADHF‐CS patients as compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. One‐hundred‐ninety of the 238 CS patients enrolled in the aforementioned period were considered for the present analysis: 101 AMI‐CS (80% ST‐elevated myocardial infarction and 20% non‐ST‐elevated myocardial infarction) and 89 ADHF‐CS. As compared with AMI‐CS, ADHF‐CS patients were younger [63 (IQR 59–76) vs. 67 (IQR 54–73) years, P = 0.01], but presented with higher creatinine [1.6 (IQR 1.0–2.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR 1.0–1.4) mg/dL, P < 0.001], bilirubin [1.3 (IQR 0.9–2.3) vs. 0.6 (IQR 0.4–1.1) mg/dL, P = 0.01], and central venous pressure values [14 mmHg (IQR 8–12) vs. 10 mmHg (IQR 7–14),P = 0.01]. Norepinephrine was the most common catecholamine used in AMI‐CS (79.3%), whereas epinephrine was used more commonly in ADHF‐CS (65.5%); 75.8% vs. 46.6% received a temporary mechanical support in AMI‐CS and ADHF‐CS, respectively (P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was longer in the latter [28 (IQR 13–48) vs. 17 (IQR 9–29) days, P = 0.001]. Heart replacement therapies were more frequently used in the ADHF‐CS group (heart transplantation 13.5% vs. 0% and left ventricular assist device 11% vs. 2%, P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In‐hospital mortality was 41.1% (38.6% AMI‐CS vs. 43.8% ADHF‐CS, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: ADHF‐CS is characterized by a higher prevalence of end‐organ and biventricular dysfunction at presentation, a longer hospital length of stay, and higher need of heart replacement therapies when compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital mortality was similar between the two aetiologies. Our data warrant development of new management protocols focused on CS aetiology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10682868/ /pubmed/37723131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bertaina, Maurizio Morici, Nuccia Frea, Simone Garatti, Laura Briani, Martina Sorini, Carlotta Villanova, Luca Corrada, Elena Sacco, Alice Moltrasio, Marco Ravera, Amelia Tedeschi, Michele Bertoldi, Letizia Lettino, Maddalena Saia, Francesco Corsini, Anna Camporotondo, Rita Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia Bertolin, Stephanie Rota, Matteo Oliva, Fabrizio Iannaccone, Mario Valente, Serafina Pagnesi, Matteo Metra, Marco Sionis, Alessandro Marini, Marco De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria Kapur, Navin K. Pappalardo, Federico Tavazzi, Guido Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title | Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title_full | Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title_short | Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
title_sort | differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertainamaurizio differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT moricinuccia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT freasimone differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT garattilaura differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT brianimartina differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT sorinicarlotta differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT villanovaluca differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT corradaelena differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT saccoalice differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT moltrasiomarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT raveraamelia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT tedeschimichele differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT bertoldiletizia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT lettinomaddalena differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT saiafrancesco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT corsinianna differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT camporotondorita differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT colombocostanzanataliajulia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT bertolinstephanie differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT rotamatteo differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT olivafabrizio differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT iannacconemario differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT valenteserafina differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT pagnesimatteo differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT metramarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT sionisalessandro differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT marinimarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT deferrarigaetanomaria differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT kapurnavink differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT pappalardofederico differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction AT tavazziguido differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction |