Cargando…

Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction

AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertaina, Maurizio, Morici, Nuccia, Frea, Simone, Garatti, Laura, Briani, Martina, Sorini, Carlotta, Villanova, Luca, Corrada, Elena, Sacco, Alice, Moltrasio, Marco, Ravera, Amelia, Tedeschi, Michele, Bertoldi, Letizia, Lettino, Maddalena, Saia, Francesco, Corsini, Anna, Camporotondo, Rita, Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia, Bertolin, Stephanie, Rota, Matteo, Oliva, Fabrizio, Iannaccone, Mario, Valente, Serafina, Pagnesi, Matteo, Metra, Marco, Sionis, Alessandro, Marini, Marco, De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria, Kapur, Navin K., Pappalardo, Federico, Tavazzi, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510
_version_ 1785151069797482496
author Bertaina, Maurizio
Morici, Nuccia
Frea, Simone
Garatti, Laura
Briani, Martina
Sorini, Carlotta
Villanova, Luca
Corrada, Elena
Sacco, Alice
Moltrasio, Marco
Ravera, Amelia
Tedeschi, Michele
Bertoldi, Letizia
Lettino, Maddalena
Saia, Francesco
Corsini, Anna
Camporotondo, Rita
Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia
Bertolin, Stephanie
Rota, Matteo
Oliva, Fabrizio
Iannaccone, Mario
Valente, Serafina
Pagnesi, Matteo
Metra, Marco
Sionis, Alessandro
Marini, Marco
De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
Kapur, Navin K.
Pappalardo, Federico
Tavazzi, Guido
author_facet Bertaina, Maurizio
Morici, Nuccia
Frea, Simone
Garatti, Laura
Briani, Martina
Sorini, Carlotta
Villanova, Luca
Corrada, Elena
Sacco, Alice
Moltrasio, Marco
Ravera, Amelia
Tedeschi, Michele
Bertoldi, Letizia
Lettino, Maddalena
Saia, Francesco
Corsini, Anna
Camporotondo, Rita
Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia
Bertolin, Stephanie
Rota, Matteo
Oliva, Fabrizio
Iannaccone, Mario
Valente, Serafina
Pagnesi, Matteo
Metra, Marco
Sionis, Alessandro
Marini, Marco
De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
Kapur, Navin K.
Pappalardo, Federico
Tavazzi, Guido
author_sort Bertaina, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI‐CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AMI‐CS or ADHF‐CS enrolled in the Altshock‐2 registry between March 2020 and February 2022 were selected. The primary objective was the characterization of ADHF‐CS patients as compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. One‐hundred‐ninety of the 238 CS patients enrolled in the aforementioned period were considered for the present analysis: 101 AMI‐CS (80% ST‐elevated myocardial infarction and 20% non‐ST‐elevated myocardial infarction) and 89 ADHF‐CS. As compared with AMI‐CS, ADHF‐CS patients were younger [63 (IQR 59–76) vs. 67 (IQR 54–73) years, P = 0.01], but presented with higher creatinine [1.6 (IQR 1.0–2.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR 1.0–1.4) mg/dL, P < 0.001], bilirubin [1.3 (IQR 0.9–2.3) vs. 0.6 (IQR 0.4–1.1) mg/dL, P = 0.01], and central venous pressure values [14 mmHg (IQR 8–12) vs. 10 mmHg (IQR 7–14),P = 0.01]. Norepinephrine was the most common catecholamine used in AMI‐CS (79.3%), whereas epinephrine was used more commonly in ADHF‐CS (65.5%); 75.8% vs. 46.6% received a temporary mechanical support in AMI‐CS and ADHF‐CS, respectively (P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was longer in the latter [28 (IQR 13–48) vs. 17 (IQR 9–29) days, P = 0.001]. Heart replacement therapies were more frequently used in the ADHF‐CS group (heart transplantation 13.5% vs. 0% and left ventricular assist device 11% vs. 2%, P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In‐hospital mortality was 41.1% (38.6% AMI‐CS vs. 43.8% ADHF‐CS, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: ADHF‐CS is characterized by a higher prevalence of end‐organ and biventricular dysfunction at presentation, a longer hospital length of stay, and higher need of heart replacement therapies when compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital mortality was similar between the two aetiologies. Our data warrant development of new management protocols focused on CS aetiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10682868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106828682023-11-30 Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction Bertaina, Maurizio Morici, Nuccia Frea, Simone Garatti, Laura Briani, Martina Sorini, Carlotta Villanova, Luca Corrada, Elena Sacco, Alice Moltrasio, Marco Ravera, Amelia Tedeschi, Michele Bertoldi, Letizia Lettino, Maddalena Saia, Francesco Corsini, Anna Camporotondo, Rita Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia Bertolin, Stephanie Rota, Matteo Oliva, Fabrizio Iannaccone, Mario Valente, Serafina Pagnesi, Matteo Metra, Marco Sionis, Alessandro Marini, Marco De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria Kapur, Navin K. Pappalardo, Federico Tavazzi, Guido ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: The present analysis from the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry aims to better define clinical features, in‐hospital course, and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS) as compared with that complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI‐CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AMI‐CS or ADHF‐CS enrolled in the Altshock‐2 registry between March 2020 and February 2022 were selected. The primary objective was the characterization of ADHF‐CS patients as compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital length of stay and mortality were secondary endpoints. One‐hundred‐ninety of the 238 CS patients enrolled in the aforementioned period were considered for the present analysis: 101 AMI‐CS (80% ST‐elevated myocardial infarction and 20% non‐ST‐elevated myocardial infarction) and 89 ADHF‐CS. As compared with AMI‐CS, ADHF‐CS patients were younger [63 (IQR 59–76) vs. 67 (IQR 54–73) years, P = 0.01], but presented with higher creatinine [1.6 (IQR 1.0–2.6) vs. 1.2 (IQR 1.0–1.4) mg/dL, P < 0.001], bilirubin [1.3 (IQR 0.9–2.3) vs. 0.6 (IQR 0.4–1.1) mg/dL, P = 0.01], and central venous pressure values [14 mmHg (IQR 8–12) vs. 10 mmHg (IQR 7–14),P = 0.01]. Norepinephrine was the most common catecholamine used in AMI‐CS (79.3%), whereas epinephrine was used more commonly in ADHF‐CS (65.5%); 75.8% vs. 46.6% received a temporary mechanical support in AMI‐CS and ADHF‐CS, respectively (P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was longer in the latter [28 (IQR 13–48) vs. 17 (IQR 9–29) days, P = 0.001]. Heart replacement therapies were more frequently used in the ADHF‐CS group (heart transplantation 13.5% vs. 0% and left ventricular assist device 11% vs. 2%, P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). In‐hospital mortality was 41.1% (38.6% AMI‐CS vs. 43.8% ADHF‐CS, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: ADHF‐CS is characterized by a higher prevalence of end‐organ and biventricular dysfunction at presentation, a longer hospital length of stay, and higher need of heart replacement therapies when compared with AMI‐CS. In‐hospital mortality was similar between the two aetiologies. Our data warrant development of new management protocols focused on CS aetiology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10682868/ /pubmed/37723131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bertaina, Maurizio
Morici, Nuccia
Frea, Simone
Garatti, Laura
Briani, Martina
Sorini, Carlotta
Villanova, Luca
Corrada, Elena
Sacco, Alice
Moltrasio, Marco
Ravera, Amelia
Tedeschi, Michele
Bertoldi, Letizia
Lettino, Maddalena
Saia, Francesco
Corsini, Anna
Camporotondo, Rita
Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia
Bertolin, Stephanie
Rota, Matteo
Oliva, Fabrizio
Iannaccone, Mario
Valente, Serafina
Pagnesi, Matteo
Metra, Marco
Sionis, Alessandro
Marini, Marco
De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
Kapur, Navin K.
Pappalardo, Federico
Tavazzi, Guido
Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title_full Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title_short Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
title_sort differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14510
work_keys_str_mv AT bertainamaurizio differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT moricinuccia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT freasimone differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT garattilaura differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT brianimartina differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT sorinicarlotta differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT villanovaluca differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT corradaelena differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT saccoalice differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT moltrasiomarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT raveraamelia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT tedeschimichele differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT bertoldiletizia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT lettinomaddalena differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT saiafrancesco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT corsinianna differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT camporotondorita differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT colombocostanzanataliajulia differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT bertolinstephanie differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT rotamatteo differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT olivafabrizio differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT iannacconemario differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT valenteserafina differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT pagnesimatteo differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT metramarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT sionisalessandro differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT marinimarco differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT deferrarigaetanomaria differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kapurnavink differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT pappalardofederico differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction
AT tavazziguido differencesbetweencardiogenicshockrelatedtoacutedecompensatedheartfailureandacutemyocardialinfarction