Cargando…

Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is a leading treatment technique for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but its treatment failure rate remains high. The awake prone position (APP) has been proven to increase oxygenation and reduce the endotracheal intubation rate in patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xixin, Luo, Xiaoqing, Li, Qin, Chen, Guihua, Tong, Jin, Deng, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8
_version_ 1785151132791734272
author Zhou, Xixin
Luo, Xiaoqing
Li, Qin
Chen, Guihua
Tong, Jin
Deng, Wang
author_facet Zhou, Xixin
Luo, Xiaoqing
Li, Qin
Chen, Guihua
Tong, Jin
Deng, Wang
author_sort Zhou, Xixin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is a leading treatment technique for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but its treatment failure rate remains high. The awake prone position (APP) has been proven to increase oxygenation and reduce the endotracheal intubation rate in patients with COVID-19-induced AHRF. However, the APP is poorly tolerated in patients, and its performance in improving prognoses is controversial. The lateral position has a similar mechanism and effect to the prone position, but it is more tolerable than the prone position. Therefore, it is worth exploring whether the lateral position is better for awake patients with AHRF. METHODS: This is a protocol for a three-arm parallel-group multicentre randomised controlled open-label exploratory trial. A total of 583 patients from two hospitals in Chongqing, China, will be randomised to take the semi-recumbent position, lateral position, or prone position at a ratio of 1:1:1. Patients are all diagnosed with AHRF secondary to non-COVID-19 pneumonia or lung infection and receiving HFNO therapy. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days in 28 days. The secondary outcomes are the 28-day intubation rate, 28-day all-cause mortality, total position change time, the incidence of adverse events, number of hours using HFNO therapy, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and others. We will conduct subgroup analyses on the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspiration oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio (> 200 mmHg or ≤ 200 mmHg), time from admission to intervention implementation (< 24 h or ≥ 24 h), position changing time, and different diagnoses. DISCUSSION: This trial will explore the prognostic effects of the APP with that of the lateral position in awake patients with non-COVID-19AHRF and compare the differences between them. To provide evidence for clinical decision-making and further research on position management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR2200055822. Registered on January 20, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106831652023-11-30 Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial Zhou, Xixin Luo, Xiaoqing Li, Qin Chen, Guihua Tong, Jin Deng, Wang Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is a leading treatment technique for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but its treatment failure rate remains high. The awake prone position (APP) has been proven to increase oxygenation and reduce the endotracheal intubation rate in patients with COVID-19-induced AHRF. However, the APP is poorly tolerated in patients, and its performance in improving prognoses is controversial. The lateral position has a similar mechanism and effect to the prone position, but it is more tolerable than the prone position. Therefore, it is worth exploring whether the lateral position is better for awake patients with AHRF. METHODS: This is a protocol for a three-arm parallel-group multicentre randomised controlled open-label exploratory trial. A total of 583 patients from two hospitals in Chongqing, China, will be randomised to take the semi-recumbent position, lateral position, or prone position at a ratio of 1:1:1. Patients are all diagnosed with AHRF secondary to non-COVID-19 pneumonia or lung infection and receiving HFNO therapy. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days in 28 days. The secondary outcomes are the 28-day intubation rate, 28-day all-cause mortality, total position change time, the incidence of adverse events, number of hours using HFNO therapy, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and others. We will conduct subgroup analyses on the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspiration oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio (> 200 mmHg or ≤ 200 mmHg), time from admission to intervention implementation (< 24 h or ≥ 24 h), position changing time, and different diagnoses. DISCUSSION: This trial will explore the prognostic effects of the APP with that of the lateral position in awake patients with non-COVID-19AHRF and compare the differences between them. To provide evidence for clinical decision-making and further research on position management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR2200055822. Registered on January 20, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8. BioMed Central 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10683165/ /pubmed/38012708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zhou, Xixin
Luo, Xiaoqing
Li, Qin
Chen, Guihua
Tong, Jin
Deng, Wang
Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title_full Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title_fullStr Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title_full_unstemmed Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title_short Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
title_sort prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with hfno therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxixin proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT luoxiaoqing proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT liqin proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT chenguihua proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT tongjin proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT dengwang proneversuslateralpositioninacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailurepatientswithhfnotherapystudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledopenlabeltrial