Cargando…

Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England

AIMS: To explore existing regulatory mechanisms to restrict hot food takeaway (HFT) outlets through further understanding processes at local and national levels. METHODS: The Planning Appeals Portal was utilised to identify recent HFT appeal cases across England between December 2016 and March 2020....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Malley, CL, Lake, AA, Moore, HJ, Gray, N, Bradford, C, Petrokofsky, C, Papadaki, A, Spence, S, Lloyd, S, Chang, M, Townshend, TG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37572038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17579139231187492
_version_ 1785151174692831232
author O’Malley, CL
Lake, AA
Moore, HJ
Gray, N
Bradford, C
Petrokofsky, C
Papadaki, A
Spence, S
Lloyd, S
Chang, M
Townshend, TG
author_facet O’Malley, CL
Lake, AA
Moore, HJ
Gray, N
Bradford, C
Petrokofsky, C
Papadaki, A
Spence, S
Lloyd, S
Chang, M
Townshend, TG
author_sort O’Malley, CL
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To explore existing regulatory mechanisms to restrict hot food takeaway (HFT) outlets through further understanding processes at local and national levels. METHODS: The Planning Appeals Portal was utilised to identify recent HFT appeal cases across England between December 2016 and March 2020. Eight case study sites were identified using a purposive sampling technique and interviews carried out with 12 professionals involved in planning and health to explore perceptions of and including factors that may impact on the HFT appeal process. Additionally, documents applicable to each case were analysed and a survey completed by seven Local Authority (LA) health professionals. To confirm findings, interpretation meetings were conducted with participants and a wider group of planning and public health professionals, including a representative from the Planning Inspectorate. RESULTS: Eight case study sites were identified, and 12 interviews conducted. Participants perceived that LAs would be better able to work on HFT appeal cases if professionals had a good understanding of the planning process/the application of local planning policy and supplementary planning documents; adequate time and capacity to deal with appeals cases; access to accurate, robust, and up to date information; support and commitment from elected members and senior management; good lines of communication with local groups/communities interested in the appeal; information and resources that are accessible and easy to interpret across professional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Communication across professional groups appeared to be a key factor in successfully defending decisions. Understanding the impact of takeaway outlets on health and communities in the long term was also important. To create a more robust appeals case and facilitate responsiveness, professionals involved in an appeal should know where to locate current records and statistical data. The enthusiasm of staff and support from senior management/elected officials will play a significant role in driving these agendas forward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106833412023-11-30 Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England O’Malley, CL Lake, AA Moore, HJ Gray, N Bradford, C Petrokofsky, C Papadaki, A Spence, S Lloyd, S Chang, M Townshend, TG Perspect Public Health Peer Review AIMS: To explore existing regulatory mechanisms to restrict hot food takeaway (HFT) outlets through further understanding processes at local and national levels. METHODS: The Planning Appeals Portal was utilised to identify recent HFT appeal cases across England between December 2016 and March 2020. Eight case study sites were identified using a purposive sampling technique and interviews carried out with 12 professionals involved in planning and health to explore perceptions of and including factors that may impact on the HFT appeal process. Additionally, documents applicable to each case were analysed and a survey completed by seven Local Authority (LA) health professionals. To confirm findings, interpretation meetings were conducted with participants and a wider group of planning and public health professionals, including a representative from the Planning Inspectorate. RESULTS: Eight case study sites were identified, and 12 interviews conducted. Participants perceived that LAs would be better able to work on HFT appeal cases if professionals had a good understanding of the planning process/the application of local planning policy and supplementary planning documents; adequate time and capacity to deal with appeals cases; access to accurate, robust, and up to date information; support and commitment from elected members and senior management; good lines of communication with local groups/communities interested in the appeal; information and resources that are accessible and easy to interpret across professional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Communication across professional groups appeared to be a key factor in successfully defending decisions. Understanding the impact of takeaway outlets on health and communities in the long term was also important. To create a more robust appeals case and facilitate responsiveness, professionals involved in an appeal should know where to locate current records and statistical data. The enthusiasm of staff and support from senior management/elected officials will play a significant role in driving these agendas forward. SAGE Publications 2023-08-12 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10683341/ /pubmed/37572038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17579139231187492 Text en © Royal Society for Public Health 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Peer Review
O’Malley, CL
Lake, AA
Moore, HJ
Gray, N
Bradford, C
Petrokofsky, C
Papadaki, A
Spence, S
Lloyd, S
Chang, M
Townshend, TG
Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title_full Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title_fullStr Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title_short Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England
title_sort regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in england
topic Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37572038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17579139231187492
work_keys_str_mv AT omalleycl regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT lakeaa regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT moorehj regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT grayn regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT bradfordc regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT petrokofskyc regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT papadakia regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT spences regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT lloyds regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT changm regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland
AT townshendtg regulatorymechanismstocreatehealthierenvironmentsplanningappealsandhotfoodtakeawaysinengland