Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary toxicities caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors are a prominent concern for clinicians. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are critical for managing these toxicities. METHODS: A systematic search of CPGs on checkpoint-associated pulmonary toxicities (ca-PT) was conducted in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donkor, Kofi N, Jang, Hyeree, Sail, Reena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231203153
_version_ 1785151185400889344
author Donkor, Kofi N
Jang, Hyeree
Sail, Reena
author_facet Donkor, Kofi N
Jang, Hyeree
Sail, Reena
author_sort Donkor, Kofi N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary toxicities caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors are a prominent concern for clinicians. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are critical for managing these toxicities. METHODS: A systematic search of CPGs on checkpoint-associated pulmonary toxicities (ca-PT) was conducted in October 2022. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. AGREE II and AGREE-REX were used to appraise CPGs and recommendations quality, respectively. Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis (H) test, and Spearman’s correlation were used for analyses. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. Matrices were used to determine recommendation differences between CPGs. The study’s design was based on the PRISMA 2020 checklist for systematic reviews. Protocol registration number: CRD42022358435. RESULTS: Eight CPGs (two high-quality, three moderate-quality, and three low-quality) were identified. All CPGs covered pneumonitis. One CPG covered pleural effusions and pneumonitis/SARs-CoV-2-infection. Three CPGs covered sarcoidosis-like-reactions. CPGs for pulmonary fibrosis, airway disease, bronchiolitis, and diffuse alveolar damage, were unavailable. No CPG recommendation was based on a prospective study, and none were appraised as high-quality. Also, recommendations were not specific to histopathologic subtypes. AGREE II’s “rigor of development,” the domain that evaluates a guideline’s methodological approach and strategies in gathering scientific evidence, correlated strongly with AGREE-REX’s “overall quality” pneumonitis recommendations, r = .952; P < .01. Approximately 73% of recommendations on pneumonitis were similar between high-quality CPGs. About 16% to 74% of low-quality CPGs were similar to those recommended by high-quality CPGs. CONCLUSION: Prospectively designed research projects focusing on all types of ca-PT and their histopathologic subtypes are urgently needed. Due to the lack of high-quality recommendations in available CPGs, the disparities in treatment recommendations between high-quality CPGs, and the similarities in recommendations that exists between high-quality and low-quality CPGs, clinicians should thoroughly assess and responsibly appraise all available CPG recommendations in formulating treatment strategies for ca-PT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106833902023-11-30 A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines Donkor, Kofi N Jang, Hyeree Sail, Reena Clin Med Insights Oncol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Pulmonary toxicities caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors are a prominent concern for clinicians. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are critical for managing these toxicities. METHODS: A systematic search of CPGs on checkpoint-associated pulmonary toxicities (ca-PT) was conducted in October 2022. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. AGREE II and AGREE-REX were used to appraise CPGs and recommendations quality, respectively. Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis (H) test, and Spearman’s correlation were used for analyses. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. Matrices were used to determine recommendation differences between CPGs. The study’s design was based on the PRISMA 2020 checklist for systematic reviews. Protocol registration number: CRD42022358435. RESULTS: Eight CPGs (two high-quality, three moderate-quality, and three low-quality) were identified. All CPGs covered pneumonitis. One CPG covered pleural effusions and pneumonitis/SARs-CoV-2-infection. Three CPGs covered sarcoidosis-like-reactions. CPGs for pulmonary fibrosis, airway disease, bronchiolitis, and diffuse alveolar damage, were unavailable. No CPG recommendation was based on a prospective study, and none were appraised as high-quality. Also, recommendations were not specific to histopathologic subtypes. AGREE II’s “rigor of development,” the domain that evaluates a guideline’s methodological approach and strategies in gathering scientific evidence, correlated strongly with AGREE-REX’s “overall quality” pneumonitis recommendations, r = .952; P < .01. Approximately 73% of recommendations on pneumonitis were similar between high-quality CPGs. About 16% to 74% of low-quality CPGs were similar to those recommended by high-quality CPGs. CONCLUSION: Prospectively designed research projects focusing on all types of ca-PT and their histopathologic subtypes are urgently needed. Due to the lack of high-quality recommendations in available CPGs, the disparities in treatment recommendations between high-quality CPGs, and the similarities in recommendations that exists between high-quality and low-quality CPGs, clinicians should thoroughly assess and responsibly appraise all available CPG recommendations in formulating treatment strategies for ca-PT. SAGE Publications 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10683390/ /pubmed/38033741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231203153 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Donkor, Kofi N
Jang, Hyeree
Sail, Reena
A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title_full A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title_short A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Pulmonary Toxicities Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Quality of Treatment Recommendations and Differences in Management Strategies Between Guidelines
title_sort systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for managing pulmonary toxicities caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors: quality of treatment recommendations and differences in management strategies between guidelines
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795549231203153
work_keys_str_mv AT donkorkofin asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines
AT janghyeree asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines
AT sailreena asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines
AT donkorkofin systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines
AT janghyeree systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines
AT sailreena systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagingpulmonarytoxicitiescausedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsqualityoftreatmentrecommendationsanddifferencesinmanagementstrategiesbetweenguidelines