Cargando…

Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools

INTRODUCTION: Implementation leadership (IL) are effective point of care (POC) nursing leadership behaviors that facilitate contexts conducive to the successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). However, no systematic evaluation of IL tools validated for the nursing context existed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castiglione, Sonia Angela, Frechette, Julie, Agnihotram, V. Ramanakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608231216161
_version_ 1785151185676664832
author Castiglione, Sonia Angela
Frechette, Julie
Agnihotram, V. Ramanakumar
author_facet Castiglione, Sonia Angela
Frechette, Julie
Agnihotram, V. Ramanakumar
author_sort Castiglione, Sonia Angela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Implementation leadership (IL) are effective point of care (POC) nursing leadership behaviors that facilitate contexts conducive to the successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). However, no systematic evaluation of IL tools validated for the nursing context existed. AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare iterations of two IL measurement tools, the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) and the iLEAD, for application in a nursing context; and to critically appraise and summarize the methodological quality of studies assessing their psychometric properties. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in four databases. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, and performed extraction into data tables. Statisticians appraised the quality control aspects. Findings were narratively summarized. RESULTS: A total of 247 records were included, where 10 for the ILS (including different versions) and one for the iLEAD met the inclusion criteria. Three studies evaluated the psychometric properties of the ILS in nursing, and its translations into Chinese and Greek. Content validity was deemed to be doubtful for both tools, but the ILS had adequate rating for comprehensiveness; methodological quality was very good for structural validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness where applicable for both scales, with the exception of cross-cultural validity which had ratings of adequate and inadequate for versions of the scales. Several study findings met the criteria for good measurement properties. No studies for either tool formally assessed feasibility. CONCLUSION: Applying validated and contextually relevant tools to evaluate the capacity of nursing leadership to engage in IL in real-world contexts are needed. The ILS shows promise but requires further validation for contexts with diverse and multiple nursing leaders at the POC. Feasibility needs to be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106833912023-11-30 Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools Castiglione, Sonia Angela Frechette, Julie Agnihotram, V. Ramanakumar SAGE Open Nurs Review Article INTRODUCTION: Implementation leadership (IL) are effective point of care (POC) nursing leadership behaviors that facilitate contexts conducive to the successful implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). However, no systematic evaluation of IL tools validated for the nursing context existed. AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare iterations of two IL measurement tools, the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) and the iLEAD, for application in a nursing context; and to critically appraise and summarize the methodological quality of studies assessing their psychometric properties. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in four databases. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, and performed extraction into data tables. Statisticians appraised the quality control aspects. Findings were narratively summarized. RESULTS: A total of 247 records were included, where 10 for the ILS (including different versions) and one for the iLEAD met the inclusion criteria. Three studies evaluated the psychometric properties of the ILS in nursing, and its translations into Chinese and Greek. Content validity was deemed to be doubtful for both tools, but the ILS had adequate rating for comprehensiveness; methodological quality was very good for structural validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness where applicable for both scales, with the exception of cross-cultural validity which had ratings of adequate and inadequate for versions of the scales. Several study findings met the criteria for good measurement properties. No studies for either tool formally assessed feasibility. CONCLUSION: Applying validated and contextually relevant tools to evaluate the capacity of nursing leadership to engage in IL in real-world contexts are needed. The ILS shows promise but requires further validation for contexts with diverse and multiple nursing leaders at the POC. Feasibility needs to be further studied. SAGE Publications 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10683391/ /pubmed/38033620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608231216161 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Castiglione, Sonia Angela
Frechette, Julie
Agnihotram, V. Ramanakumar
Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title_full Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title_fullStr Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title_full_unstemmed Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title_short Implementation Leadership in the Point of Care Nursing Context: A Systematic Review Comparing Two Measurement Tools
title_sort implementation leadership in the point of care nursing context: a systematic review comparing two measurement tools
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23779608231216161
work_keys_str_mv AT castiglionesoniaangela implementationleadershipinthepointofcarenursingcontextasystematicreviewcomparingtwomeasurementtools
AT frechettejulie implementationleadershipinthepointofcarenursingcontextasystematicreviewcomparingtwomeasurementtools
AT agnihotramvramanakumar implementationleadershipinthepointofcarenursingcontextasystematicreviewcomparingtwomeasurementtools