Cargando…

Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region

OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEITE, GIULENA ROSA, MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE, MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO, GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710
_version_ 1785151193798934528
author LEITE, GIULENA ROSA
MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE
MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO
GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO
author_facet LEITE, GIULENA ROSA
MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE
MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO
GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO
author_sort LEITE, GIULENA ROSA
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implementation, totaling 654 patients. Data were obtained in structured interviews. In parallel, 450 checklist assessments were performed in medical records from public health institutions in the Southwest II Health Region of Goiás state, Brazil. RESULTS: six items from the checklist were evaluated and all of these exhibited differences (p < 0.000). Of the medical records analyzed, 69.9% contained the checklist in stage I and 96.5% in stage II, with better data completeness. In stage II, after training, the checklist was associated with surgery (OR; 1.38; IC95%: 1.25-1.51; p < 0.000), medium-sized hospital (OR; 1.11; CI95%; 1.0-1.17; p < 0.001), male gender (OR; 1.07; CI95%; 1.0-1.14; p < 0.010), type of surgery (OR; 1.7; CI95%: 1.07-1.14; p < 0.014) and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 to 60 min after incision (OR; 1.10; CI95%: 1.04-1.17; p < 0.000) and 30 to 60 min after surgery (OR; 1.23; CI95%: 1.04-1.45; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: the implementation strategy of the safe surgery checklist in small and medium-sized healthcare institutions was relevant and associated with better responses based on patient, data availability and completeness of the data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106834262023-11-30 Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region LEITE, GIULENA ROSA MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO Rev Col Bras Cir Original Article OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implementation, totaling 654 patients. Data were obtained in structured interviews. In parallel, 450 checklist assessments were performed in medical records from public health institutions in the Southwest II Health Region of Goiás state, Brazil. RESULTS: six items from the checklist were evaluated and all of these exhibited differences (p < 0.000). Of the medical records analyzed, 69.9% contained the checklist in stage I and 96.5% in stage II, with better data completeness. In stage II, after training, the checklist was associated with surgery (OR; 1.38; IC95%: 1.25-1.51; p < 0.000), medium-sized hospital (OR; 1.11; CI95%; 1.0-1.17; p < 0.001), male gender (OR; 1.07; CI95%; 1.0-1.14; p < 0.010), type of surgery (OR; 1.7; CI95%: 1.07-1.14; p < 0.014) and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 to 60 min after incision (OR; 1.10; CI95%: 1.04-1.17; p < 0.000) and 30 to 60 min after surgery (OR; 1.23; CI95%: 1.04-1.45; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: the implementation strategy of the safe surgery checklist in small and medium-sized healthcare institutions was relevant and associated with better responses based on patient, data availability and completeness of the data. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10683426/ /pubmed/33852703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710 Text en © 2021 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
LEITE, GIULENA ROSA
MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE
MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO
GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO
Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title_full Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title_fullStr Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title_full_unstemmed Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title_short Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
title_sort safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710
work_keys_str_mv AT leitegiulenarosa safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion
AT martinsmarleneandrade safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion
AT maialudmilagrego safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion
AT garciazapatamarcotulioantonio safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion