Cargando…
Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region
OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implem...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710 |
_version_ | 1785151193798934528 |
---|---|
author | LEITE, GIULENA ROSA MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO |
author_facet | LEITE, GIULENA ROSA MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO |
author_sort | LEITE, GIULENA ROSA |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implementation, totaling 654 patients. Data were obtained in structured interviews. In parallel, 450 checklist assessments were performed in medical records from public health institutions in the Southwest II Health Region of Goiás state, Brazil. RESULTS: six items from the checklist were evaluated and all of these exhibited differences (p < 0.000). Of the medical records analyzed, 69.9% contained the checklist in stage I and 96.5% in stage II, with better data completeness. In stage II, after training, the checklist was associated with surgery (OR; 1.38; IC95%: 1.25-1.51; p < 0.000), medium-sized hospital (OR; 1.11; CI95%; 1.0-1.17; p < 0.001), male gender (OR; 1.07; CI95%; 1.0-1.14; p < 0.010), type of surgery (OR; 1.7; CI95%: 1.07-1.14; p < 0.014) and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 to 60 min after incision (OR; 1.10; CI95%: 1.04-1.17; p < 0.000) and 30 to 60 min after surgery (OR; 1.23; CI95%: 1.04-1.45; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: the implementation strategy of the safe surgery checklist in small and medium-sized healthcare institutions was relevant and associated with better responses based on patient, data availability and completeness of the data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10683426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106834262023-11-30 Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region LEITE, GIULENA ROSA MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO Rev Col Bras Cir Original Article OBJECTIVE: assess patient responses and associated factors of items on a safe surgery checklist, and identify use before and after protocol implementation from the records. METHODS: a cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2016 with 397 individuals in stage I and 257 in stage II, 12 months after implementation, totaling 654 patients. Data were obtained in structured interviews. In parallel, 450 checklist assessments were performed in medical records from public health institutions in the Southwest II Health Region of Goiás state, Brazil. RESULTS: six items from the checklist were evaluated and all of these exhibited differences (p < 0.000). Of the medical records analyzed, 69.9% contained the checklist in stage I and 96.5% in stage II, with better data completeness. In stage II, after training, the checklist was associated with surgery (OR; 1.38; IC95%: 1.25-1.51; p < 0.000), medium-sized hospital (OR; 1.11; CI95%; 1.0-1.17; p < 0.001), male gender (OR; 1.07; CI95%; 1.0-1.14; p < 0.010), type of surgery (OR; 1.7; CI95%: 1.07-1.14; p < 0.014) and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 to 60 min after incision (OR; 1.10; CI95%: 1.04-1.17; p < 0.000) and 30 to 60 min after surgery (OR; 1.23; CI95%: 1.04-1.45; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: the implementation strategy of the safe surgery checklist in small and medium-sized healthcare institutions was relevant and associated with better responses based on patient, data availability and completeness of the data. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10683426/ /pubmed/33852703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710 Text en © 2021 Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article LEITE, GIULENA ROSA MARTINS, MARLENE ANDRADE MAIA, LUDMILA GREGO GARCIA-ZAPATA, MARCO TÚLIO ANTONIO Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title | Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title_full | Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title_fullStr | Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title_full_unstemmed | Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title_short | Safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
title_sort | safe surgery checklist: evaluation in a neotropical region |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leitegiulenarosa safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion AT martinsmarleneandrade safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion AT maialudmilagrego safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion AT garciazapatamarcotulioantonio safesurgerychecklistevaluationinaneotropicalregion |