Cargando…

Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure

AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiu, Yin-Ling, Sun, Kai-Xuan, Zhang, Qian, Xiao, Yu-Hong, Bai, Xue, Chen, Yong, Zhao, Meng-Si, Yu, Yue-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640
_version_ 1785151243374559232
author Xiu, Yin-Ling
Sun, Kai-Xuan
Zhang, Qian
Xiao, Yu-Hong
Bai, Xue
Chen, Yong
Zhao, Meng-Si
Yu, Yue-Xin
author_facet Xiu, Yin-Ling
Sun, Kai-Xuan
Zhang, Qian
Xiao, Yu-Hong
Bai, Xue
Chen, Yong
Zhao, Meng-Si
Yu, Yue-Xin
author_sort Xiu, Yin-Ling
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 2020 from Northern Theater General Hospital. Patients were divided into natural cycles, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles, depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-HRT, and endometrial scratching (ES) plus depot GnRH agonist-HRT. The primary endpoint was clinical pregnancy rate, while secondary endpoints included live birth rate and pain assessment. RESULTS: Of the 605 recruited patients, 63 were undergoing natural cycles, 281 were treated with HRT cycles, 141 treated with depot GnRH agonist-HRT, and 120 treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT. There were significant differences among protocols on clinical pregnancy rate (P=0.029), while no significant difference was observed among protocols on live birth rates (P=0.108). Multivariate analyses suggested that HRT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.89; P=0.019) and depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27–0.91; P=0.021) cycles were associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate as compared with natural cycles, while no significant difference between ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT and natural cycles for clinical pregnancy rates (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.38–1.36; P=0.313). Moreover, the HRT (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.39–1.28; P=0.239), depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.35–1.29; P=0.229), and ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58–2.14; P=0.754) cycles had no significant effects on live birth rate as compared with natural cycles. A total of 87.50% patients treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT reported pain during the procedure. CONCLUSION: ES and depot GnRH agonists could be considered for RIF women with high-quality blastocysts, 14 days after verified transplantation failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106836512023-11-30 Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure Xiu, Yin-Ling Sun, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Qian Xiao, Yu-Hong Bai, Xue Chen, Yong Zhao, Meng-Si Yu, Yue-Xin Int J Womens Health Original Research AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 2020 from Northern Theater General Hospital. Patients were divided into natural cycles, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles, depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-HRT, and endometrial scratching (ES) plus depot GnRH agonist-HRT. The primary endpoint was clinical pregnancy rate, while secondary endpoints included live birth rate and pain assessment. RESULTS: Of the 605 recruited patients, 63 were undergoing natural cycles, 281 were treated with HRT cycles, 141 treated with depot GnRH agonist-HRT, and 120 treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT. There were significant differences among protocols on clinical pregnancy rate (P=0.029), while no significant difference was observed among protocols on live birth rates (P=0.108). Multivariate analyses suggested that HRT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.89; P=0.019) and depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27–0.91; P=0.021) cycles were associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate as compared with natural cycles, while no significant difference between ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT and natural cycles for clinical pregnancy rates (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.38–1.36; P=0.313). Moreover, the HRT (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.39–1.28; P=0.239), depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.35–1.29; P=0.229), and ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58–2.14; P=0.754) cycles had no significant effects on live birth rate as compared with natural cycles. A total of 87.50% patients treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT reported pain during the procedure. CONCLUSION: ES and depot GnRH agonists could be considered for RIF women with high-quality blastocysts, 14 days after verified transplantation failure. Dove 2023-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10683651/ /pubmed/38035202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640 Text en © 2023 Xiu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Xiu, Yin-Ling
Sun, Kai-Xuan
Zhang, Qian
Xiao, Yu-Hong
Bai, Xue
Chen, Yong
Zhao, Meng-Si
Yu, Yue-Xin
Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title_full Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title_fullStr Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title_short Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
title_sort outcome of different endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640
work_keys_str_mv AT xiuyinling outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT sunkaixuan outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT zhangqian outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT xiaoyuhong outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT baixue outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT chenyong outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT zhaomengsi outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure
AT yuyuexin outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure