Cargando…
Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640 |
_version_ | 1785151243374559232 |
---|---|
author | Xiu, Yin-Ling Sun, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Qian Xiao, Yu-Hong Bai, Xue Chen, Yong Zhao, Meng-Si Yu, Yue-Xin |
author_facet | Xiu, Yin-Ling Sun, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Qian Xiao, Yu-Hong Bai, Xue Chen, Yong Zhao, Meng-Si Yu, Yue-Xin |
author_sort | Xiu, Yin-Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 2020 from Northern Theater General Hospital. Patients were divided into natural cycles, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles, depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-HRT, and endometrial scratching (ES) plus depot GnRH agonist-HRT. The primary endpoint was clinical pregnancy rate, while secondary endpoints included live birth rate and pain assessment. RESULTS: Of the 605 recruited patients, 63 were undergoing natural cycles, 281 were treated with HRT cycles, 141 treated with depot GnRH agonist-HRT, and 120 treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT. There were significant differences among protocols on clinical pregnancy rate (P=0.029), while no significant difference was observed among protocols on live birth rates (P=0.108). Multivariate analyses suggested that HRT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.89; P=0.019) and depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27–0.91; P=0.021) cycles were associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate as compared with natural cycles, while no significant difference between ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT and natural cycles for clinical pregnancy rates (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.38–1.36; P=0.313). Moreover, the HRT (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.39–1.28; P=0.239), depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.35–1.29; P=0.229), and ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58–2.14; P=0.754) cycles had no significant effects on live birth rate as compared with natural cycles. A total of 87.50% patients treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT reported pain during the procedure. CONCLUSION: ES and depot GnRH agonists could be considered for RIF women with high-quality blastocysts, 14 days after verified transplantation failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10683651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106836512023-11-30 Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure Xiu, Yin-Ling Sun, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Qian Xiao, Yu-Hong Bai, Xue Chen, Yong Zhao, Meng-Si Yu, Yue-Xin Int J Womens Health Original Research AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles among women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) treated with various endometrial preparation protocols. METHODS: A total of 605 women with RIF were retrospectively recruited between January 2017 and December 2020 from Northern Theater General Hospital. Patients were divided into natural cycles, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles, depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-HRT, and endometrial scratching (ES) plus depot GnRH agonist-HRT. The primary endpoint was clinical pregnancy rate, while secondary endpoints included live birth rate and pain assessment. RESULTS: Of the 605 recruited patients, 63 were undergoing natural cycles, 281 were treated with HRT cycles, 141 treated with depot GnRH agonist-HRT, and 120 treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT. There were significant differences among protocols on clinical pregnancy rate (P=0.029), while no significant difference was observed among protocols on live birth rates (P=0.108). Multivariate analyses suggested that HRT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.89; P=0.019) and depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27–0.91; P=0.021) cycles were associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate as compared with natural cycles, while no significant difference between ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT and natural cycles for clinical pregnancy rates (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.38–1.36; P=0.313). Moreover, the HRT (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.39–1.28; P=0.239), depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.35–1.29; P=0.229), and ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58–2.14; P=0.754) cycles had no significant effects on live birth rate as compared with natural cycles. A total of 87.50% patients treated with ES combined with depot GnRH agonist-HRT reported pain during the procedure. CONCLUSION: ES and depot GnRH agonists could be considered for RIF women with high-quality blastocysts, 14 days after verified transplantation failure. Dove 2023-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10683651/ /pubmed/38035202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640 Text en © 2023 Xiu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Xiu, Yin-Ling Sun, Kai-Xuan Zhang, Qian Xiao, Yu-Hong Bai, Xue Chen, Yong Zhao, Meng-Si Yu, Yue-Xin Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title | Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title_full | Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title_fullStr | Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title_short | Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure |
title_sort | outcome of different endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failure |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S433640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiuyinling outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT sunkaixuan outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT zhangqian outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT xiaoyuhong outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT baixue outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT chenyong outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT zhaomengsi outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure AT yuyuexin outcomeofdifferentendometrialpreparationprotocolspriortofrozenthawedembryotransferonpregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithrepeatedimplantationfailure |